Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Divergent responses of diverse microalgae commonly found in drinking water source water to UV-C treatment

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microalgae pose major problems for drinking water treatment processes either through membrane fouling or through blooming events in source water during the summer months. Disinfection treatments such as chlorination and UV-C treatment of drinking water are designed to remove microorganisms including microalgae and bacteria. In order to treat water efficiently it is critical to understand the effect of UV-C treatment on the viability and vitality of phytoplankton. Moreover, this information can be used to assess the utility of UV-C treatment as a potential pre-treatment option for water clean-up. In this study we tested the population growth of 6 phytoplankton species representing three major taxonomic groups (green algae, diatoms and cyanobacteria), commonly found in freshwater lakes in North America and relevant for water treatment facilities. We exposed these species to UV-C treatment and monitored their post-exposure population growth over a 52–55-day period using a plate-based MPN (most probable number) method. We found the green alga Scenedesmus quadricauda and the cyanobacterium Anabaena flos-aquae to be most tolerant to the treatment, while the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa and the diatom Asterionella formosa were found to be most sensitive with viability being reduced at comparatively lower doses. No significant delays in growth post treatment (i.e. time lags) were reported within species. Asterionella formosa and Aulacoseira granulata showed the longest time lags of all species, which might be in part correlated with DNA repair mechanisms and other physiological adaptations. This work provides the basis for the assessment of UV-C treatment efficacy on freshwater phytoplankton.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are provided in a supplemental file.

References

  • Adhikary SP, Sahu JK (1998) UV protecting pigment of the terrestrial cyanobacterium Tolypothrix byssoidea. J Plant Physiol 153:770–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre LE, Ouyang L, Elfwing A, Hedblom M, Wulff A, Inganäs O (2018) Diatom frustules protect DNA from ultraviolet light. Sci Rep 8:5138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed F, Fanning K, Netzel M, Schenk PM (2015) Induced carotenoid accumulation in Dunaliella salina and Tetraselmis suecica by plant hormones and UV-C radiation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:9407–9416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alam ZB, Otaki M, Furumai H, Ohgaki S (2001) Direct and indirect activation of Microcystis aeruginosa by UV-radiation. Water Res 35:1008–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barasanti L, Gualtieri P (2014) Algae: anatomy, biochemistry and biotechnology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betancourt WQ, Rose JB (2004) Drinking water treatment processes for removal of Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Vet Parasitol 126:219–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blatchley ER, Cullen J, Petri B, Bircher K, Welschmeyer N (2018) The biological basis for ballast water performance standards: “viable/non-viable” or “live/dead”. Environ Sci Technol 52:8075–8086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borderie F, Alaoui-Sehmer L, Bousta F, Alaoui-Sossé B, Aleya L (2014) Cellular and molecular damage caused by high UV-C irradiation of the cave-harvested green alga Chlorella minutissima: implications for cave management. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 93:118–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Monroy O, Linley RD, Chan P, Kydd J, Byllaardt JV, Bailey S (2017) Evaluating efficacy of filtration + UV-C radiation for ballast water treatment at different temperatures. J Sea Res 133:20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou Y, Hsieh M, Yeh H (2010) Effect of algal extracellular polymer substances on UF membrane fouling. Desalination 250:648–652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper JT, Kannan MS, Kalleyer DE (2011) Bacillariophyta: the diatoms. In: American Water Works Association (ed) Algae: source to treatment. American Water Works Association, Denver, pp 207–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen JJ (2018) Quantitative framework for validating two methodologies that enumerate viable organisms or type approval of ballast water management systems. Sci Total Environ 627:1602–1626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen JJ, MacIntyre HL (2016) On the use of the serial dilution culture method to enumerate viable phytoplankton in natural communities of plankton subjected to ballast water treatment. J Appl Phycol 28:279–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano L, De Stefano M, Maddalena P, Moretti L, Rea I, Mocella V, Rendina I (2007) Playing with light in diatoms: small water organisms with a natural photonic crystal structure. Proc SPIE 659313

  • Deng L, Wenshan G, Ngo HH, Zhang H, Wang J, Li J, Xia S, Wi Y (2016) Biofouling and control approaches in membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol 221:656–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dionisio-Sese M (2010) Aquatic microalgae as potential sources of UV-screening compounds. Philipp J Sci 139:5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellegaard M, Lenau T, Lundholm N, Maibohm C, Friis SMM, Rottwitt K, Si Y (2016) The fascinating diatom frustule- can it play a role for attenuation of UV radiation. J Appl Phycol 28:3295–3306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estepp LR, Reavie ED (2015) The ecological history of Lake Ontario according to phytoplankton. J Great Lakes Res 41:669–687

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer IR, Humpage AR (2005) Health risk assessment of cyanobacterial (blue-green algal) toxins in drinking water. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2:43–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Cui Y, Xiong W, Li X, Wi Q (2009) Effect of UV-C on algal evolution and differences in growth rate, pigmentation and photosynthesis between prokaryotic and eukaryotic algae. Photochem Photobiol 85:774–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao W, Liang H, Ma J, Chen Z, Han Z, Li G (2011) Membrane fouling control in ultrafiltration technology for drinking water production: A review. Desalination 272:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hannach G, Sigleo AC (1998) Photoinduction of UV-absorbing compounds in six species of marine phytoplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 174:207–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada (2006) It’s your health: drinking water chlorination. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/healthy-living/your-health/environment/drinking-water-chlorination.html. Accessed 16 February 2020

  • Health Canada (2019) Guidelines for Canadian drinking water quality guideline technical document; enteric viruses. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/guidelines-canadian-drinking-water-quality-guideline-technical-document-enteric-viruses.html. Accessed 17 July 2020

  • Holzinger A, Lütz C (2006) Algae and UV irradiation: effects on ultrastructure and related metabolic functions. Micron 37:190–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hull NM, Isola MR, Petri B, Chan P, Linden KG (2017) Algal DNA repair kinetics support culture-based enumeration for validation of ultraviolet disinfection ballast water treatment systems. Environ Sci Technol Lett 4:192–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jahns P, Holzwarth AR (2012) The role of the xanthophyll cycle and of lutein in photoprotection of photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 1817:182–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jimoh TA, Cowan AK (2017) Extracellular polymeric substance production in high rate algal oxidation ponds. Water Sci Technol 76:2647–2654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karentz D, Cleaver JE, Mitchell DL (1991) Cell survival characteristics and molecular responses of Antarctic phytoplankton to ultraviolet-B radiation. J Phycol 27:326–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Chung Y, Shin D, Kim M, Lee Y, Lim Y, Lee D (2002) Chlorination by-products in surface water treatment process. Desalination 151:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King WD, Marrett LD (1996) Case-control study of bladder cancer and chlorination by-products in treated water (Ontario, Canada). Cancer Causes Control 7:596–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knappe DRU, Belk RC, Briley DS, Gandy SR, Rastogi N, Rike AH, Glasgow H, Hannon E, Frazier WD, Kohl P, Pugsley S (2004) Algae detection and removal strategies for drinking water treatment plants. American Water Works Association and AWWA Research Foundation, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman KR, Allenbach LB, Ball CL, Fusco WG, La Duc MT, Kuhlman GM, Anderson RC, Stuecker T, Erickson IK, Benardini J, Crawford RL (2005) Enumeration, isolation, and characterization of ultraviolet (UV-C) resistant bacteria from rock varnish in the Whipple Mountains, California. Icarus 174:585–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar D, Keshari N, Suku P, Adhikary SP (2019) Response of the sub-aerial cyanobacterium Scytonema millei to UV-C irradiation. Indian J Exp Biol 57:362–367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leynaert A, Fardel C, Beker B, Soler C, Delebecq G, Lemercier A, Pondaven P, Durand PE, Heggarty K (2018) Diatom frustule nanostructure in pelagic and benthic environments. Silicon 10:2701–2709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liebich V, Stehouwer PP, Veldhuis M (2012) Re-growth of potential invasive phytoplankton following UV-based ballast water treatment. Aquat Invasions 7:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgreen K, Holbech H, Pedersen KL, Petersen GI, Andreasen RR, George C, Drillet G, Andersen M (2018) UV Fluences required for compliance with ballast water discharge standards using two approved methods for algal viability assessment. Mar Pollut Bull 135:1090–1100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Gao K (2010) Spiral breakage and photoinhibition of Arthrospira platensis (Cyanophyta) caused by accumulation of reactive oxygen species under solar radiation. Environ Exp Bot 68:208–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre HL, Cullen JJ (2005) Using cultures to investigate the physiological ecology of microalgae. In: Andersen RA (ed) Algal culture techniques. Academic Press, New York, pp 287–326

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre HL, Cullen JJ (2016) Classification of phytoplankton cells as live or dead using the vital stains fluorescein diacetate and 5‐chloromethylfluorescein diacetate. J Phycol 52:572–589

  • MacIntyre HL, Cullen JJ, Whitsitt TJ, Petri B (2018) Enumerating viable phytoplankton using a culture-based Most Probable Number assay following ultraviolet-C treatment. J Appl Phycol 30:1073–1094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie AF, Maltby EA, Harper N, Bueley C, Olender D, Wyeth RC (2019) Periodic ultraviolet-C illumination for marine sensor antifouling. Biofouling 35:483–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RB, Markus DDR, Sutherland TF (2018) The effect of ultraviolet light (UV-C) on marine phytoplankton fluorescence. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 3289:1–18

  • Martínez LF, Mahamud MM, Lavín AG, Bueno JL (2013) The regrowth of phytoplankton cultures after UV disinfection. Mar Pollut Bull 67:152–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masojídek J, Kopecká J, Koblížek M, Torzillo G (2004) The xanthophyll cycle in green algae (Chlorophyta): Its role in the photosynthetic apparatus. Plant Biol 6:342–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michalak AM, Anderson EJ, Beletsky D, Boland S, Bosch NS, Bridgeman TB, Chaffin JD, Cho K, Confesor R, Daloglu I, DePinto JV, Evans MA, Fahnenstiel GL, He L, Ho JC, Jenkins L, Johengen TH, Kuo KC, LaPorte E, Liu X, McWilliams MR, Moore MR, Posselt DJ, Richards RP, Scavia D, Steiner AL, Verhamme E, Wright DM, Zagorski MA (2013) Record-setting algal bloom in Lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:6448–6452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Micheik A, Cassaignon S, Livage J, Gibaud A, Berthier S, Lopez PJ (2018) Optical properties of nanostructured silica structures from marine organisms. Front Mar Sci 5:123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munawar M, Munawar IF (1986) The seasonality of phytoplanktonin North American Great Lakes, a comparative synthesis. Hydrobiologia 138:85–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (US) Safe Drinking Water Committee (1980) Drinking water and health: volume 2. National Academies Press (US). Accessed 12 February 2020

  • Nguyen T, Roddick FA, Fan L (2012) Biofouling of water treatment membranes: a review of the underlying causes, monitoring techniques and control measures. Membranes 2:804–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols HW (1979) Growth media – freshwater. In: Stein JR (ed) Handbook of phycological methods, culture methods & growth measurements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Niyogi KK, Björkman O, Grossman AR (1997) The roles of specific xanthophylls in photoprotection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94:14162–14167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen RO, Hoffmann F, Hess-Erga O, Larsen A, Thuestad G, Hoell IA (2016) Ultraviolet radiation as a ballast water treatment strategy: inactivation of phytoplankton measured with flow cytometry. Mar Pollut Bull 103:270–275

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ou H, Gao N, Deng Y, Wang H, Zhang H (2011) Inactivation and degradation of Microcystis aeruginosa by UV-C irradiation. Chemosphere 85:1192–1198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ou H, Gao N, Deng Y, Qiao J, Wang H (2012) Intermediate and long term impacts of UV-C irradiation on photosynthetic capacity, survival and microcystin-LR release risk of Microcystis aeruginosa. Water Res 46:1241–1250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer CM (1962) Algae in water supplies of Ohio. OJS 62:225–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer CM (1977) Algae and water pollution: An illustrated manual on the identification, significance, and control of algae in water supplies and in polluted water (EPA/600/9-77/036). Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=20013HX0.TXT. Accessed 11 February 2019

  • Patnaik J, Swain N, Adhikary SP (1993) Differential response of two species of the cyanobacterium Anabaena to ultraviolet (UV-C) irradiation. J Basic Microbiol 33:427–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proteau PJ, Gerwick WH, Garcia-Pichel F, Castenholz R (1993) The structure of scytonemin, an ultraviolet sunscreen pigment from the sheaths of cyanobacteria. Experentia 49:825–829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rastogi RP, Richa KA, Tyagi MB, Sinha RP (2010) Molecular mechanisms of ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage and repair. J Nucleic Acids 2010:592980

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stanier RY (1979) Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 111:1–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakai H, Oguma K, Katayama H, Ohgaki S (2007) Effects of low- or medium-pressure ultraviolet lamp irradiation on Microcystis aeruginosa and Anabaena variabilis. Water Res 41:11–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai H, Katayama H, Oguma K, Ohgaki S (2011) Effect of photoreactivation on ultraviolet inactivation of Microcystis aeruginosa. Water Sci Technol 63:1224–1229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sathasivam R, Ki J (2018) A review of the biological activities of microalgal carotenoids and their potential use in healthcare and cosmetic industries. Mar Drugs 16:26

  • Singh SP, Hӓder D, Sinha RP (2010) Cyanobacteria and ultraviolet radiation (UVR) stress: Mitigation strategies. Ageing Res Rev 9:79–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha RP, Hӓder D (2002) UV-induced DNA damage and repair: a review. Photochem Photobiol Sci 1:225–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song K, Mohseni M, Taghipour F (2019) Mechanisms investigation on bacterial inactivation through combinations of UV wavelengths. Water Res 163:114875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stal LJ, Henley WJ, Kvíderová J, Kirkwood AE, Milner J, Potter AT (2007) Cyanobacteria: diversity and versality, clues to life in extreme environments. In: Seckbach J (ed) Algae and cyanobacteria in extreme environments. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 661–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (2013) Survey of drinking water plants 2011. Ministry of Industry. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/16-403-x/16-403-×2013001-eng.pdf?st=US8MT0YO. Accessed 21 April 2020

  • Su Y, Lenau TA, Gundersen E, Kirkensgaard JJK, Maibohm C, Pinti J, Ellegaard M (2018) The UV filtering potential of drop-casted layers of frustule of three diatom species. Sci Rep 8:959

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland TF, Levings CD, Elliott CC, Hesse WW (2001) Effect of a ballast water treatment system on survivorship of natural populations of marine plankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 210:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svrcek C, Smith DW (2004) Cyanobacteria toxins and the current state of knowledge on water treatment options: a review. J Environ Eng Sci 3:155–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takaichi S (2011) Carotenoids in algae: distribution, biosynthesis and function. Mar Drugs 9:1101–1118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tao Y, Zhang X, Au DWT, Mao X, Yuan K (2010) The effects of sub-lethal UV-C irradiation on growth and cell integrity of cyanobacteria and green algae. Chemosphere 78:541–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tao Y, Mao X, Hu J, Mok HOL, Wang L, Au DWT, Zhu J, Zhang X (2013) Mechanisms of photosynthetic inactivation on growth suppression of Microcystis aeruginosa under UV-C stress. Chemosphere 93:637–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Throndsen J (1978) The dilution-culture method. In: Sournia A (ed) Phytoplankton manual. UNESCO, Paris, pp 218–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Trojan UV Resources (2018) UV vs. chlorine for wastewater disinfection. https://www.resources.trojanuv.com/uv-vs-chlorine-water-disinfection/. Accessed 11 February 2019

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] (2006) Ultraviolet Disinfection Guidance Manual for the Final Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. Office of Water, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells ML, Trainer VL, Smayda TJ, Karlson BSO, Trick CG, Kudela RM, Ishikawa A, Bernard S, Wulff A, Anderson DM, Cochlan WP (2015) Harmful algal blooms and climate change: learning from the past and present to forecast the future. Harmful Algae 49:68–93

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong F, Komenda J, Kopecký J, Nedbal L (1997) Strategies of ultraviolet-B protection in microscopic algae. Physiol Plant 100:378–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zyara AM, Torvinen E, Veijalainen A, Heinonen-Tanski H (2016) The effect of UV and combined chlorine/UV treatment on coliphages in drinking water disinfection. Water 8:130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to start by thanking the University of Guelph and the Department of Integrative Biology for the space and materials to conduct the research. We would like to acknowledge Trojan Technologies Ltd. for allowing us to use their UV equipment. We would also like to thank Dr. Josef Ackerman and Dr. Paul Sibley for their feedback and support during this project. We would also like to thank Dr. George Harauz and Dr. Vladimir Bamm for the use of the POLARstar Omega microplate reader to monitor microalgal growth.

Funding

The research in this study was funded by NSERC CRD grants to Andreas Heyland (Grant numbers [501331] and [053535]).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JR and AH designed and executed the experiments, performed the analysis and wrote the manuscript. Feedback on experimental design and data analysis was provided by PSC, BP and TM. KN assisted with algal cultures and monitoring of experiments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Heyland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Research presented in this manuscript was in part funded by Trojan Technologies through an NSERC CRD project grant.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 981 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roszell, J., Chan, PS., Petri, B. et al. Divergent responses of diverse microalgae commonly found in drinking water source water to UV-C treatment. J Appl Phycol 33, 1541–1557 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02404-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02404-4

Keywords

Navigation