Harvesting Neochloris oleoabundans using commercial organic flocculants
Microalgal cultures are inherently dilute, and increasing their concentration is essential for volume reduction and further processing. Flocculation is a classical operation in water treatment that is also used as a concentration step in microalgal biotechnology. However, flocculation is highly dependent on the physicochemical characteristics of the system, such as cell charge and concentration, pH, and solutes in the system, and the coagulant or flocculant to be used. This paper describes the efficiency of nine flocculating agents applied to Neochloris oleoabundans flocculation: low molecular weight chitosan; Zetag® 8165, 8185, 7652, and 4120; Magnafloc® LT22 and 351; and Tanfloc® SG and SH. The influence of flocculant concentration (from 3 to 16 mg L−1) and pH (from 6 to 10) was evaluated, showing a small influence of pH and a large influence of the type and concentration of flocculating agent. These effects are discussed regarding the flocculant charge and the zeta potential of the cells. The best flocculants were Zetag® 8185, Zetag® 8165, and chitosan, with floc sedimentation efficiencies higher than 95%. These flocculants were further evaluated for their efficiency in various concentrations at the native pH of N. oleoabundans cultures, with good efficiency.
KeywordsFlocculant Microalgae Neochloris Zeta potential Cost
The authors thank the Brazilian funding agencies CAPES and CNPq for their support in this work and Dr. Rilton Alves de Freitas for the assistance in zeta potential analyses.
- Alibaba (2016) Chitosan price, chitosan price suppliers and manufacturers. In: www.alibaba.com . https://www.alibaba.com/showroom/chitosanprice.%0Ahtml. Accessed 6 May 2016
- Independent Statistics & Analysis (EIA) (2016) Electric power monthly: with data for January 2016. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Ovenden C, Xiao H (2002) Flocculation behaviour and mechanisms of cationic inorganic microparticle/polymer systems. Colloids Surfaces A 197:225–234Google Scholar
- Pahl S, Lee A, Kalaitzidis T, Ashman P, Sathe S, Lewis D (2013) Harvesting, thickening and dewatering microalgae biomass. In: Borowitzka MA, Moheimani NR (eds) Algae for biofuels and energy. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 165-185Google Scholar
- Richmond A, Becker EW (1986) Technological aspects of mass cultivation—a general outline. In: Richmond A, Hu Q (eds) Handbook of microalgal mass culture, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 245–263Google Scholar
- Scottish Marine Institute (2016) BG11 (Blue-Green medium). In: CCAP (Culture Collect. Algae Protozoa). https://www.ccap.ac.uk/media/documents/BG11.pdf. Accessed 1 Jun 2015
- Singh RP, Tripathy T, Karmakar GP, Rath SK, Karmakar NC, Pandey SR, Kannan K, Jain SK, Lan NT (2000) Novel biodegradable flocculants based on polysaccharides. Curr Sci 78:798–803Google Scholar
- Tenney MW, Stumm W, Mark W (1965) Chemical flocculation of microorganisms in biological waste treatment. Water Environ Fed 37:1370–1388Google Scholar