Amino acid composition, protein content, and nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors of 21 seaweed species from Norwegian waters
- 821 Downloads
The Norwegian seaweed industry is expanding and there is a need for accurate estimates of protein content of seaweed species from Norwegian waters. A solid method to calculate protein content is through the sum of the proteomic amino acids; however, it can be expensive and beyond the capacities of many laboratories. The most commonly used method to quantify protein is based on the assessment of crude protein from overall nitrogen content, using the traditional nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of 6.25. However, this approach can be inaccurate when applied to seaweeds, often resulting in an overestimation of their protein content. Specific nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors, calculated from amino acid composition and total nitrogen, give a more reliable protein quantification in seaweeds. However, no such factors are available for species from Norwegian waters. This study was designed to characterize the amino acid composition of 21 seaweed species from Norwegian waters and use the amino acid data to estimate protein contents of the seaweeds. Crude protein analysis (nitrogen × 6.25) was performed and resulted in overestimation (18–44 %) of the protein content compared to the sum of proteomic amino acids. Specific nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors, calculated for each species, ranged from 3.53 ± 0.1 to 5.13 ± 0.1. This study provides nutritional data on Norwegian seaweeds, covering a relatively wide range of species. Moreover, it is the first study to assess nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors on such species.
KeywordsAmino acids Macroalgae Nitrogen N-Prot factor Protein Seaweed
This study was supported by the Norwegian Research Council project Aquafly, grant number 238997, and RAFFPINN, grant number 220634. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
- Aitken K, Melton L, Brown M (1991) Seasonal protein variation in the New Zealand seaweeds Porphyra columbina Mont. & Porphyra subtumens J. Ag. (Rhodophyceae). Jap J Phycol 39:307–317Google Scholar
- Cochran WG, Cox GM (1953) Experimental designs. John Wiley & Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Dumas JP (1831) Lettre de M. Dumas a M. Gay-Lussac, sur le procedes de l’analyse organique. Ann Chim Phys 2:198–215Google Scholar
- Heesch S, Pažoutová M, Moniz MBJ, Rindi F (2016) Prasiolales (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta) of the Svalbard archipelago: diversity, biogeography and description of the new genera Prasionella and Prasionema. Eur J Phycol 51:171–187Google Scholar
- Skjermo J, Aasen IM, Arff J, Broch OJ, Carvajal A, Christie H, Forbord S, Olsen Y, Reitan KI, Rustad T et al (2014) A new Norwegian bioeconomy based on cultivation and processing of seaweeds: opportunities and R&D needs. SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture—Report A25981:48Google Scholar