Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 1253–1261 | Cite as

Effects of temperature, light level, photoperiod, and ammonium concentration on Pyropia leucosticta (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from the Northwest Atlantic

  • Lindsay A. GreenEmail author
  • Christopher D. Neefus


Seaweed aquaculture in the Northwest Atlantic is a growing industry that is currently based on winter-spring kelp production. Aquaculture of Pyropia leucosticta, a species of economically valuable nori, could provide a spring-summer crop and diversify the industry. The objectives of this study were to determine the optimum conditions for the production of the foliose blade phase and the conditions for advancement from the microscopic conchocelis to the foliose blade phase of P. leucosticta. Foliose blades were grown under a matrix of temperatures (10, 15, and 20 °C), photoperiods (8:16, 12:12, and 16:8 L:D), and light levels (30, 60, 110, and 250 μmol photons m−2 s−1) for a period of 1 month. Free-living conchocelis was grown under a matrix of temperatures (10, 15, and 20 °C), photoperiods (8:16, 12:12, and 16:8 L:D), and ammonium concentrations (20 and 500 μM) for 8–12 weeks. Blades grew optimally at 10 to 15 °C, ≥110 μmol photons m−2 s−1 and ≥12 h of light in the day, with growth rates of over 18 % day−1 recorded. Phycobilin content of blades significantly decreased with increasing day length, while protein content significantly decreased with increasing light level. Conchospore release and germination was observed after approximately 40 days under all tested photoperiods, temperatures, and ammonium concentrations and none of these treatments significantly affected the time until germination. Overall, this study provides important background information required for the establishment of Pyropia leucosticta aquaculture in the Northwest Atlantic.


Pyropia leucosticta Seaweed aquaculture Physiology Life history Mariculture 



We would like to acknowledge Leland Jahnke, Arthur Mathieson, Charles Yarish, and David Berlinsky for their valuable feedback on this manuscript. Partial funding was provided by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station. This is Scientific Contribution Number 2572. This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project 223365.This research was also funded by a grant from New Hampshire Sea Grant (R/CFR-14, C.D. Neefus). 


  1. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bray TL, Neefus CD, Mathieson AC (2006) Morphological and molecular variability of Porphyra purpurea (Roth) C. Agardh (Rhodophyta, Bangiales) from the Northwest Atlantic. Nova Hedwigia 82:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodie J, Irvine LM (2003) Seaweeds of the British Isles, Volume 1 Rhodophyta, Part 3B Bangiophycidae. The National History Museum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Brodie J, Bartsch I, Neefus C, Orfanidis S, Bray T, Mathieson AC (2007) New insights into the cryptic diversity of the North Atlantic-Mediterranean ‘Porphyra leucosticta’ complex: P. olivii sp. nov. and P. rosengurtii (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). Eur J Phycol 42:3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodie J, Mols-Mortensen A, Ramirez ME, Russell S, Rinkel B (2008) Making the links: towards a global taxonomy for the red algal genus Porphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). J Appl Phycol 20:939–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broom JES, Farr TJ, Nelson WA (2004) Phylogeny of the Bangia flora of New Zealand suggests a southern origin for Porphyra and Bangia (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:1197–1207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clokie JJP, Boney AD (1980) Conchocelis distribution in the Firth of Clyde: estimates of the lower limits of the photic zone. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 46:111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole K, Conway E (1980) Studies in the Bangiaceae: reproductive modes. Bot Mar 23:545–553Google Scholar
  9. Conover WJ, Iman RL (1981) Rank transformation as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Stat 35:124–129Google Scholar
  10. Conway E, Cole K (1977) Studies in the Bangiaceae: structure and reproduction of the conchocelis of Porphyra and Bangia in culture (Bangiales, Rhodophyceae). Phycologia 16:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drew KM (1949) Conchocelis-phase in the life-history of Porphyra umbilicalis (L.) Kütz. Nature 164:748–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (2014) Cultured aquatic species information programme: Porphyra spp. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. Federer WT, King F (2007) Variations on split plot and split block experimental designs. Wiley- Interscience, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Figueroa FL, Salles S, Aguilera J, Jimenez C, Mercado J, Vinegla B, Flores-Moya A, Altamirano M (1997) Effects of solar radiation of photoinhibition and pigmentation in the red alga Porphyra leucosticta. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 151:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gargiulo GM, Masi FD, Genovese G, Tripodi G (1994) Karyology and effects of temperature and photoperiod on the life-cycle of Porphyra leucosticta Thuret in Le Jolis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from the Mediterranean Sea. Jpn J Phycol 42:271–280Google Scholar
  16. He P, Yarish C (2006) The developmental regulation of mass cultures of free-living conchocelis for commercial net seeding of Porphyra leucosticta from Northeast America. Aquaculture 257:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hernández I, Corzo A, Gordillo FJ, Robles MD, Saez E, Fernández JA, Niell FX (1993) Seasonal cycle of the gametophytic form of Porphyra umbilicalis: nitrogen and carbon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 99:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Israel A (2010) The extreme environments of Porphyra, a fast growing and edible red marine macroalga. In: Seckbach J, Chapman DJ (eds) Red algae in the genomic age, cellular origins. Life in extreme habitats and astrobiology. Springer, New York, pp 61–75Google Scholar
  19. Kim JK, Kraemer GP, Neefus CD, Chung IK, Yarish C (2007) Effects of temperature and ammonium on growth, pigment production and nitrogen uptake by four species of Porphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) native to the New England coast. J Appl Phycol 19:431–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klein AS, Mathieson AC, Neefus CD, Clain DF, Taylor HA, Teasdale BW, West AL, Hehre EJ, Brodie J, Yarish C, Wallace AL (2003) Identification of north-western Atlantic Porphyra (Bangiaceae, Bangiales) based on sequence variation in nuclear SSU and plastid rbcL genes. Phycologia 42:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Korbee N, Figueroa FL, Aguilera J (2005a) Effect of light quality on the accumulation of photosynthetic pigments, proteins and mycosporine-like amino acids in the red algae Porphyra leucosticta (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). J Photochem Photobiol B 80:71–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Korbee N, Huovinen P, Figueroa FL, Aguilera J, Karsten U (2005b) Availability of ammonium influences photosynthesis and the accumulation of mycosporine-like amino acids in two Porphyra species (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). Mar Biol 146:645–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krishnamurthy V (1969) The conchocelis phase of three species of Porphyra in culture. J Phycol 5:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lobban CS, Harrison PJ (1994) Seaweed ecology and physiology. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mishkind M, Mauzerall D (1980) Kinetic evidence for common photosynthetic step in diverse seaweeds. Mar Biol 56:264–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mols-Mortensen A, Neefus CD, Nielsen R, Gunnarsson K, Egilsdóttir S, Pedersen PM, Brodie J (2012) New insights into the biodiversity and generic relationships of foliose Bangiales (Rhodophyta) in Iceland and the Faroe Islands. Eur J Phycol 47:146–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mumford TF, Miura A (1988) Porphyra as food: cultivation and economics. In: Lembi CA, Waaland JR (eds) Algae and human affairs. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 87–117Google Scholar
  28. Neefus CD, Mathieson AC, Bray TL, Yarish C (2008) The distribution, morphology, and ecology of three introduced Asiatic species of Porphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) in the Northwestern Atlantic. J Phycol 44:1399–1414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orfanidis S (2001) Culture studies of Porphyra leucosticta (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from the Gulf of Thessaloniki, Greece. Bot Mar 44:533–539Google Scholar
  30. Ott FD (1966) A selected listing of xenic cultures. Systematics-ecology program No. 72. Mar. Biol. Lab, Woods Hole, MA, pp 1–45Google Scholar
  31. Pereira R, Yarish C (2010) The role of Porphyra in sustainable culture systems: physiology and applications. In: Israel A, Einav R (eds) Role of seaweeds in a globally changing environment. Springer, New York, pp 339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramus J (1981) The capture and transduction of light energy. In: Lobban CS, Wynne MJ (eds) The biology of seaweeds. Blackwell, Boston, pp 458–492Google Scholar
  33. Sampath-Wiley P, Neefus CD (2007) An improved method from estimating R-phycoerythrin and R-phycocyanin contents from crude aqueous extracts of Porphyra (Bangiales, Rhodophyta). J Appl Phycol 19:123–129CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmitt C (2013) Maine’s kelp highway. Maine Boats Homes & Harbors 122:30–35Google Scholar
  35. Sidirelli-Wolff M (1992) The influence of temperature, irradiance and photoperiod on the reproductive life history of Porphyra leucosticta (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) in laboratory culture. Bot Mar 35:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sutherland J, Lindstrom SC, Nelson W, Brodie J, Lynch M, Hwang MS, Choi HG, Miyata M, Kikuchi N, Oliveira M, Farr T, Neefus C, Mols-Mortensen A, Milstein D, Müller K (2011) A new look at an ancient order: generic revision of the Bangiales (Rhodophyta). J Phycol 47:1131–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Talarico L, Maranzana G (2000) Light and adaptive responses in red macroalgae: an overview. J Photochem Photobiol B 56:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Teasdale B, West A, Taylor H, Klein A (2002) A simple restriction length polymorphism (RFLP) assay to discriminate common Porphyra (Bangiophyceae, Rhodophyta) taxa from the Northwest Atlantic. J Appl Phycol 14:293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Varela-Alvarez E, Stengel DB, Guiry MD (2004) The use of image processing in assessing conchocelis growth and conchospore production in Porphyra linearis. Phycologia 43:282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vergés A, Comalada N, Sánchez N, Brodie J (2013) A reassessment of the foliose Bangiales (Rhodophyta) in the Balearic Islands including a proposed synonymy of Pyropia olivii with Pyropia koreana. Bot Mar 56:229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waaland JR, Waaland SD, Bates G (1974) Chloroplast structure and pigment composition in the red alga Griffithsia pacifica: regulation by light intensity. J Phycol 10:193–199Google Scholar
  42. Yarish C, Wilkes R, Chopin T, Fei XG, Mathieson AC, Klein AS, Neefus CD, Mitman GC, Levine I (1998) Domestication of indigenous Porphyra (nori) species for commercial cultivation in Northeast America. World Aquacult 29:26–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations