Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 1203–1208 | Cite as

Starch determination in Chlorella vulgaris—a comparison between acid and enzymatic methods

  • Bruno Fernandes
  • Giuliano DragoneEmail author
  • Ana P. Abreu
  • Pedro Geada
  • José Teixeira
  • António Vicente
Article

Abstract

Different methods for estimating starch in Chlorella vulgaris were compared with the view of establishing a procedure suitable for rapid and accurate determination of starch content in this microalgal species. A close agreement was observed between methods that use perchloric acid and enzymatic methods that use α-amylase and amyloglucosidase to hydrolyze the starch of microalgae grown under different nitrogen culture conditions. Starch values obtained by these methods were significantly higher than those estimated by using hydrochloric acid as solubilizing and hydrolyzing agent. The enzymatic method (EM1) proved to be the most rapid and precise method for microalgal starch quantification. Furthermore, the evaluation of resistant starch by enzymatic methods assayed in nitrogen-sufficient and nitrogen-starved cells showed that no formation of this type of starch occurred in microalgae, meaning that this should not interfere with starch content determinations.

Keywords

Amylolytic enzymes Biofuels Chlorella vulgaris Microalgae Perchloric acid Starch hydrolysis 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research work was supported by the grants SFRH/BD/44724/2008 (Bruno Fernandes) from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portugal) and SFRH/BPD/44935/2008 (Giuliano Dragone). The authors also acknowledge the financial support received through the projects INNOVALGAE (FCT PTDC/AAC-AMB/108511/2008) and ALGANOL.

References

  1. Ahmad AL, Yasin NHM, Derek CJC, Lim JK (2011) Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:584–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brányiková I, Maršálková B, Doucha J, Brányik T, Bišová K, Zachleder V, Vítová M (2011) Microalgae—novel highly efficient starch producers. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:766–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan L, Owende P (2010) Biofuels from microalgae—a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:557–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chader S, Hacene H, Agathos SN (2009) Study of hydrogen production by three strains of Chlorella isolated from the soil in the Algerian Sahara. Int J Hydrogen Energ 34:4941–4946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen W, Zhang C, Song L, Sommerfeld M, Hu Q (2009) A high throughput Nile Red method for quantitative measurement of neutral lipids in microalgae. J Microbiol Meth 77:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen C-Y, Yeh K-L, Aisyah R, Lee D-J, Chang J-S (2011) Cultivation, photobioreactor design and harvesting of microalgae for biodiesel production: a critical review. Bioresource Technol 102:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chow PS, Landhäusser SM (2004) A method for routine measurements of total sugar and starch content in woody plant tissues. Tree Physiol 24:1129–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dragone G, Fernandes B, Vicente A, Teixeira JA (2010) Third generation biofuels from microalgae. In: Vilas AM (ed) Current research, technology and education topics in applied microbiology and microbial biotechnology, vol 2. Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, pp 1355–1366Google Scholar
  9. Dragone G, Fernandes BD, Abreu AP, Vicente AA, Teixeira JA (2011) Nutrient limitation as a strategy for increasing starch accumulation in microalgae. Appl Energ 88:3331–3335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esposito S, Guerriero G, Vona V, Di Martino RV, Carfagna S, Rigano C (2006) Glucose-6P dehydrogenase in Chlorella sorokiniana (211/8 k): an enzyme with unusual characteristics. Planta 223:796–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandes B, Dragone G, Teixeira J, Vicente A (2010) Light regime characterization in an airlift photobioreactor for production of microalgae with high starch content. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161:218–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fontana J, Passos M, Baron M, Mendes S, Ramos L (2001) Cassava starch maltodextrinization/monomerization through thermopressurized aqueous phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 91–93:469–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuentes-Zaragoza E, Riquelme-Navarrete MJ, Sánchez-Zapata E, Pérez-Álvarez JA (2010) Resistant starch as functional ingredient: a review. Food Res Int 43:931–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghiena C, Schulz M, Schnabl H (1993) Starch degradation and distribution of the starch-degrading enzymes in Vicia faba leaves (diurnal oscillation of amylolytic activity and starch content in chloroplasts). Plant Physiol 101:73–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maršálková B, Širmerová M, Kuřec M, Brányik T, Brányiková I, Melzoch K, Zachleder V (2010) Microalgae Chlorella sp. as an alternative source of fermentable sugars. Chem Eng Trans 21:1279–1284Google Scholar
  16. Megazyme (2009) Total starch assay procedure (amyloglucosidase/α-amylase method). Megazyme International Ireland Ltd., Wicklow, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  17. Mussatto SI, Dragone G, Guimarães PMR, Silva JPA, Carneiro LM, Roberto IC, Vicente A, Domingues L, Teixeira JA (2010) Technological trends, global market, and challenges of bio-ethanol production. Biotechnol Adv 28:817–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nigam PS, Singh A (2011) Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog Energ Combust 37:52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oren R, Schulze ED, Werk KS, Meyer J, Schneider BU, Heilmeier H (1988) Performance of two Picea abies (L.) Karst. stands at different stages of decline. Oecologia 75:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raessler M, Wissuwa B, Breul A, Unger W, Grimm T (2010) Chromatographic analysis of major non-structural carbohydrates in several wood species—an analytical approach for higher accuracy of data. Anal Method 2:532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rose R, Rose CL, Omi SK, Forry KR, Durall DM, Bigg WL (1991) Starch determination by perchloric acid vs enzymes: evaluating the accuracy and precision of six colorimetric methods. J Agr Food Chem 39:2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A (2006) Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng 101:87–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stephens E, Ross IL, Mussgnug JH, Wagner LD, Borowitzka MA, Posten C, Kruse O, Hankamer B (2010) Future prospects of microalgal biofuel production systems. Trends Plant Sci 15:554–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tharanathan RN, Mahadevamma S (2003) Grain legumes—a boon to human nutrition. Trends Food Sci Tech 14:507–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zemke-White WL, Clements KD (1999) Chlorophyte and rhodophyte starches as factors in diet choice by marine herbivorous fish. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 240:137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Fernandes
    • 1
  • Giuliano Dragone
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana P. Abreu
    • 1
  • Pedro Geada
    • 1
  • José Teixeira
    • 1
  • António Vicente
    • 1
  1. 1.IBB—Institute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Centre of Biological EngineeringUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations