Skip to main content

A direct comparison of the performance of the seaweed biofilters, Asparagopsis armata and Ulva rigida

Journal of Applied Phycology volume 22, pages 639–644 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

The tetrasporophyte of Asparagopsis armata has been previously established as a novel seaweed biofilter for integrated land-based mariculture. The species growth and biofiltration rates were much higher than the values described in the literature for Ulva spp., the most common seaweed biofilter. However, a validation of the advantage of one species over the other requires a study of the performances of these two species in the same system at the same time. In this work, we compared the biofiltration performance and biomass yield of A. armata and Ulva rigida cultivated in the effluents of a fish farm in southern Portugal. Comparisons were performed at different water renewal rates and in two seasons of the year. The maximum total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) removal rates were similar for both species in December (2.7 and 2.8 g TAN m–2 day–1 for U. rigida and A. armata, respectively) and higher for A. armata (6.5 g TAN m–2 day–1) than for U. rigida (5.1 g TAN m–2 day–1) in May. Higher differences were observed when estimating the nitrogen biofiltration through the organic nitrogen yield (N yield) of the biomass produced, particularly in May. This estimate is directly related with the biomass yield and the N content in the tissue which were always higher for A. armata than for U. rigida. In December, the maximum biomass yields were 71 g dry weight (DW) m–2 day–1 for A. armata and 44 g DW m–2 day–1 for U. rigida, while in May, the yield of A. armata was 125 g DW m–2 day–1 and of U. rigida was 73 g DW m–2 day–1. This study confirmed that A. armata is indeed a more efficient biofilter than U. rigida. To the best of our knowledge, the production rates reported here are the highest ever reported for macroalgae cultivated in tanks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Beer S (1994) Mechanisms of inorganic carbon acquisition in marine macroalgae (with special reference to the Chlorophyta). Prog Phycol Res 10:179–207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell RG, McLachlan J, Lloyd ND (1985) Tank cultivation of Irish oss, Chondrus crispus Stackh. Bot Mar 28:87–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton JJ, Robertson-Andersson DV, Shuuluka D, Kandjengo L (2009) Growing Ulva (Chlorophyta) in integrated systems as a commercial crop for abalone feed in South Africa: a SWOT analysis. J Appl Phycol 21:575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chopin T, Buschmann A, Halling C, Troell M, Kautsky N, Neori A, Kraemer GP, Zertuche-González J, Yarish C, Neefus C (2001) Integrating seaweeds into marine aquaculture systems: a key toward sustainability. J Phycol 37:975–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen I, Neori A (1991) Ulva lactuca biofilters for marine fishpond effluents. I. Ammonia uptake kinetics and nitrogen content. Bot Mar 34:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Busk TA, Blakeslee M, Ryther JH (1986) Studies on outdoor cultivation of Ulva lactuca L. Bot Mar 29:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasshoff K, Ehrhardt M, Kremling K (1983) Methods of seawater analysis, 2nd edn. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 419 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobbelaar JU, Nedbal L, Tichy V (1996) Influence of high frequency light/dark fluctuations on photosynthetic characteristics of microalgae photoacclimated to different light intensities and implications for mass algal cultivation. J Appl Phycol 8:335–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez del Rio M, Ramazanov Z, Garcia-Reina G (1994) Optimization of yield and biofiltering efficiencies of Ulva rigida C. Ag. cultivated with Sparus aurata L. waste waters. Sci Mar 58:329–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez del Rio M, Ramazanov Z, Garcia-Reina G (1996) Ulva rigida (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) tank culture as biofilters for dissolved inorganic nitrogen from fishpond effluents. Hydrobiologia 326(327):61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahaye M, Robic A (2007) Structure and functional properties of Ulvan, a polysaccharide from green seaweeds. Biomacromolecules 8:1764–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langton RW, Haines KC, Lyon RE (1977) Ammonia-nitrogen production by the bivalve mollusc Tapes japonica and its recovery by the red seaweed Hypnea musciformis in a tropical mariculture system. Helgol Mar Res 30:217–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mata L, Santos R (2003) Cultivation of Ulva rigida (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) in raceways, using semi-intensive fishpond effluents: yield and biofiltration. In: Chapman AR, Anderson RJ, Vreeland VJ, Davison IR (eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Seaweed Symposium, Cape Town 2001. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata L, Silva J, Schuenhoff A, Santos R (2006) The effects of light and temperature on the photosynthesis of the Asparagopsis armata tetrasporophyte (Falkenbergia rufolanosa), cultivated in tanks. Aquaculture 252:12–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mata L, Silva J, Schuenhoff A, Santos R (2007) Is the tetrasporophyte of Asparagospis armata (Bonnmeiasoniales) limited by inorganic carbon in integrated aquaculture? J Phycol 43:1252–1258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell O, Fenical W (1977) Halogen chemistry of the red alga Asparagopsis. Phytochemistry 16:367–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald ME (1987) Biological removal of nutrients from wastewater: an algal-fish system model. In: Reddy KR, Smith WH (eds) Aquatic plants for water resource recover. Magnolia Publishing, Pineville, pp 959–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Msuya FE, Neori A (2002) Ulva reticulata and Gracilaria crassa: macroalgae that can biofilter effluent from tidal fishponds in Tanzania. Western Indian Ocean J Mar Sci 1:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Neori A, Cohen I, Gordin H (1991) Ulva lactuca biofilters for marine fishpond effluents. II. Growth rate, yield and C:N ratio. Bot Mar 34:483–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neori A, Shpigel M, Ben-Ezra D (2000) A sustainable integrated system for culture of fish, seaweed and abalone. Aquaculture 186:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, Buschmann AH, Kraemer GP, Halling C, Shpigel M, Yarish C (2004) Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 231:361–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesando D, Caram B (1984) Screening of marine algae from the French Mediterranean coast for antibacterial and antifungal activity. Bot Mar 27:381–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryther J, Goldman J, Gifford C, Huguenin J, Wing A, Clarner J, Williams L, Lapointe B (1975) Physical models of integrated waste recycling—marine polyculture systems. Aquaculture 5:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador N, Garreta A, Lavelli L, Ribera M (2007) Antimicrobial activity of Iberian macroalgae. Scientia Marina 71(1):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuenhoff A, Mata L, Santos R (2006) The tetrasporophyte of Asparagopsis armata as a novel seaweed biofilter. Aquaculture 252:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troell M, Halling C, Neori A, Chopin T, Buschmann AH, Kautsky N, Yarish C (2003) Integrated mariculture: asking the right questions. Aquaculture 226:69–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financed by EU project QLRT-1999-31334 (SEAPURA) and by the project POCI⁄MAR⁄59659⁄2004 from the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal. Leonardo Mata and Andreas Schuenhoff were further financed by the Portuguese FCT PhD-scholarships (SFRH/BD/12647/2003 and SFRH/BD/13645/2003, respectively). We would like to express our deepest gratitude to Dr. Jorge Santinha, manager of Aquamarim, for all the support related to our research on integrated aquaculture and to all people involved in the field work: Diane Cunha, Bruno Lasserre, Charles Pontonnier, and Andrey Petryuk.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Algae-Marine Plant Ecology Research Group, Center of Marine Sciences of Algarve, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal

    Leonardo Mata, Andreas Schuenhoff & Rui Santos

Authors
  1. Leonardo Mata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Schuenhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rui Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonardo Mata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mata, L., Schuenhoff, A. & Santos, R. A direct comparison of the performance of the seaweed biofilters, Asparagopsis armata and Ulva rigida . J Appl Phycol 22, 639–644 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9504-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9504-z

Keywords

  • Asparagopsis armata
  • Seaweed biofilter
  • Integrated aquaculture
  • Ulva rigida