Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 103–110 | Cite as

Commercial farming of Asparagopsis armata (Bonnemaisoniceae, Rhodophyta) in Ireland, maintenance of an introduced species?

  • Stefan KraanEmail author
  • Kelly A. Barrington
Article

Abstract

The distribution of the gametophytes of Asparagopsis armata in Ireland currently encompasses a 75 km radius from a seaweed farm that commercially cultivates this species. This is a smaller range than the historic distribution shows since its arrival in Ireland in 1939. Fragmentation of this alga to seed ropes at a commercial seaweed farm seems to maintain the populations of this introduced species. Without this commercial seaweed farm A. armata would probably not flourish on the Irish west coast and this farm appears to act as a source pool for the populations. The sea surface temperatures (SSTs) of Irish waters are suitable for growth, survival and asexual reproduction of the tetrasporophyte and gametophyte; however, they may not be warm enough for sexual reproduction. The effect of temperature on the life cycle and distribution are discussed. Three species, i.e., Ulva lactuca, Plocamium cartilagineum and Cryptopleura ramosa, were hosts for epiphytic A. armata in summer in over 60% of the collected samples.

Key Words

asexual reproduction Asparagopsis armata commercial farming distribution epiphytic relationship Falkenbergia gametophyte introduced species tetrasporophyte 

Abbreviations

SST

sea surface temperature

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreakis N, Procaccini G, Kooistra WHCF (2004) Asparagopsis taxiformis and Asparagopsis armata (Bonnemaisoniales, Rhodophyta): Genetic and morphological identification of Mediterranean populations. Eur. J. Phycol. 39: 273–283.Google Scholar
  2. Boudouresque CF, Verlaque M (2002) Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: Invasive versus introduced macrophytes. Marine Pollut. Bull. 44: 32–38.Google Scholar
  3. Breeman AM (1988) Relative importance of temperature and other factors in determining geographic boundaries of seaweeds: Experimental and phenological evidence. Helgol. Meersunters. 42: 199–241.Google Scholar
  4. Breeman AM, Meulenhoff EJS, Guiry MD (1988) Life history regulation and phenology of the red alga Bonnemaisonia hamifera. Helgol. Meersunters. 42: 535–551.Google Scholar
  5. Breeman AM, Guiry MD (1989) Tidal influences on the photoperiodic induction of tetrasporogenesis in Bonnemaisonia hamifera (Rhodophyta). Marine Biol. (Berlin) 102: 5–14.Google Scholar
  6. De Valéra M (1942) A red alga new to Ireland: Asparagopsis armata Harv. on the west coast. Irish Nat. J. 8: 30–33.Google Scholar
  7. De Valéra M (1957) A note on the distribution of Asparagopsis armata and Falkenbergia rufolanosa in Ireland as compared with Spain. Coll. Bot. 5: 377–380.Google Scholar
  8. Dixon PS, Irvine LM (1977) Seaweeds of the British Isles. Volume 1. Rhodophyta. Part 1. Introduction, Nemaliales, Gigartinales. The Natural History Museum, London, p. 252.Google Scholar
  9. Drew KM (1950) Occurrence of Asparagopsis armata Harv. on the coast of Cornwall. Nature 166: 873–874.Google Scholar
  10. Feldmann J, Feldmann G (1942) Recherches sur le Bonnemaisoniaces leur alternate de generations. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Biol. Veg. Ser. 2(3): 75–175.Google Scholar
  11. Guiry MD, Dawes CJ (1992) Day length, temperature and nutrient control of tetrasporogenesis in Asparagopsis armata (Rhodophyta). J. Exp. Marine Biol. Ecol. 158: 197–217.Google Scholar
  12. Guiry MD, Hession CC (1996) The seaweed resources of Ireland. In Critchley AT, Ohno M (eds), Seaweed Resources of the World, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Yokosuka, pp. 233–245.Google Scholar
  13. Guiry MD, Cullinane JP, Whelan PM (1979) Notes on Irish marine algae. New records of Rhodophyta from the Wexford coast. Irish Nat. J. 19: 304–307.Google Scholar
  14. Hardy FG, Guiry MD (2003) A Check-List and Atlas of the Seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. British Phycological Society, London.Google Scholar
  15. van den Hoek C, Breeman AM (1990) Seaweed biogeography of the north Atlantic: Where are we now? In Garbary DJ, South GR (eds), Evolutionary Biogeography of the Marine Algae of the North Atlantic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  16. Horridge GA (1951) Occurrence of Asparagopsis armata Harv. on the Sicily Isles. Nature 167: 732–733.Google Scholar
  17. John DM, Prud’homme van Reine WF, Lawson GW, Kostermans TB, Price JH (2004) A taxonomic and geographical catalogue of the seaweeds of the western coast of Africa and adjacent islands. Beih. Nova Hedwigia 127: 1–339.Google Scholar
  18. Kaas R (1996). The seaweed resources of France. In Critchley AT, Ohno M (eds), Seaweed Resources of the World. Japan International Cooperation Agency, Yokosuka, pp. 233–245.Google Scholar
  19. Kraan S, Tramullas AV, Guiry MD (2000) The edible brown seaweed Alaria esculenta (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales): Hybridisation, growth and genetic comparisons of six Irish populations. J. Appl. Phycol. 12: 577–583.Google Scholar
  20. Marshall RA, Harper DB, McRoberts WC, Dring MJ (1999) Vol-atlie bromocarbons produced by Falkenbergia stages of Aspara-gopsis spp. (Rhodophyta). Limnol. Oceanogr. 44: 1348–1352.Google Scholar
  21. Marshall RA, Hamilton JTG, Dring MJ, Harper DB (2003) Do vesicle cells of the red alga Asparagopsis (Falkenbergia stage) play a role in bromocarbon production? Chemosphere 52: 471–475.Google Scholar
  22. Moigne JY (1998). Use of algae extract as antibacterial and/or antifungal agent and composition containing same. World Patent 98/10656 Assignee: Algues et Mer. In: Borowitzka MA (1999) Patents. J. Appl. Phycol. 15: 503–505.Google Scholar
  23. Ní Chualáin F, Maggs CA, Saunders GW, Guiry MD (2004) The invasive genus Asparagopsis (Bonnemaisoniaceae, Rhodophyta): Molecular systematics, morphology and ecophysiology of Falkenbergia isolates. J. Phycol. 40: 1112–1126.Google Scholar
  24. Price JH, John DM, Lawson GM (1986) Seaweeds of the western coast of tropical Africa and adjacent islands: A critical assessment. IV. Rhodophyta (Florideae) 1. Gebera A-F. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Bot. Ser. 15: 1–122.Google Scholar
  25. Ribera MA, Boudouresque CF (1995) Introduced marine plants, with special reference to macroalgae: Mechanisms and impact. Prog. Phycol. Res. 11: 187–268.Google Scholar
  26. Santelices B (1990) Patterns of reproduction, dispersal and recruitment in seaweeds. Oceanogr. Marine Biol. Annu. Rev. 28: 177–276.Google Scholar
  27. Santelices B, Abott IA (1978) New records of marine algae from Chile and their effect on phytogeography. Phycologia 17: 213–222.Google Scholar
  28. Werner A, Clarke D, Kraan S (2004) Strategic review of the feasibility of seaweed aquaculture in Ireland. NDP Marine RTDI Desk Study Series, DK/01/008.2004, p. 120.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Irish Seaweed Centre, Martin Ryan InstituteNational University of IrelandIreland
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of New BrunswickSaint JohnCanada

Personalised recommendations