Skip to main content
Log in

Community-Centred Environmental Discourse: Redefining Water Management in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Australian government's response to the Millennium Drought (1997–2010) has been met with praise and contestation. While proponents saw the response as timely and crucial, critics claimed it was characterized by government overreach and mismanagement. Five months of field research in farm communities in the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) identified two dominant discourses: administrative rationalism and a local community-based discourse I have termed community-centrism. Administrative rationalism reflects the value of scientific inquiry in service to the state and is the dominant research-based problem-solving model used by water and natural resource agencies (Dryzek in The politics of the earth: environmental discourses, Oxford University Press, 2013; Colloff and Pittock in Aust J Water Resour, 23(2):88–98, 2019). Community-centrism was identified through discussions with farmers and represents a bottom-up approach to environmental planning and management that seeks to incorporate local knowledge, planning, and direct participation. This investigation reveals how discourses define problems and policy choices. While market-based government interventions were likely necessary to address the crisis in the MDB, community-centred responses could have enhanced the government’s capacity to respond to problems. This paper argues that the long-term sustainability of water management in the Basin will require a reorientation on the part of farmers, academics, and governments to develop a community-centred approach to water policies impacting agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Around the towns of Narrandera, Leeton, Finley, and Griffith.

  2. Other than companies owned by their own families to organize an inter-generational business.

  3. 1 hectare = 2.471 acres or 10,000 square meters.

References

  • Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., Naess, L. O., Wolf, J., & Wreford, A. (2008). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93(3–4), 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandra, J. (2021). Navigating the Anthropocene’s rivers of risk—climatic change and science-policy dilemmas in Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin. Climatic Change., 165, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderies, J. M., & Barreteau, O. (2019). Governance principles for robust and resilient coastal systems in the face of global change. Regional Environmental Change, 19(7), 1831–1833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Gadgil, M. (1995). Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability. In Biodiversity Conservation, (pp. 281–299).

  • Bischoff-mattson, Z., & Lynch, A. H. (2016). Adaptive governance in water reform discourses of the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. (1994). Which way for the ecology movement? AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner. (2010). Adaptive governance as a reform strategy. Policy Sciences, 43(4), 301–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R., & Lynch, A. H. (2010). Adaptive governance and climate change. American Meteorological Society.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth, J. L., & Malano, H. M. (2001). Decision making in multi-jurisdictional river basins: A case study of the Murray-Darling basin. Water International, 26(3), 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F., & Franks, T. (2008). Distilling or diluting? Negotiating the water research-policy interface. Water Alternatives, 1(1), 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colloff, M. J., & Pittock, J. (2019). Why we disagree about the Murray-Darling Basin Plan: Water reform, environmental knowledge and the science-policy decision context. Australian Journal of Water Resources, 23(2), 88–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell (2005). A Change in the Water- Climate and Culture in Australia. (T. G. and L. R. Tim Sherratt, Ed.). National Museum of Australia Press.

  • Connell, & Grafton, R. Q. (2011). Water reform in the Murray-Darling Basin. Water Resources Research, 47(4).

  • Crase, L., Dollery, B., & Wallis, J. (2005). Community consultation in public policy: The case of the Murray-Darling Basin of Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 40(2), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crase, L., O'Keefe, S., & Kinoshita, Y. (2012). Enhancing agrienvironmental outcomes: Market-based approaches to water in Australia's Murray-Darling Basin. Water Resources Research, 48(9).

  • Crase, L., O’Keefe, S., & Dollery, B. (2014). Talk is cheap, or is it? The cost of consulting about uncertain reallocation of water in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Ecological Economics, 88, 206–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewan, C., Mukherji, A., & Buisson, M. (2015). Evolution of water management in coastal Bangladesh: From temporary earthen embankments to depoliticized community-managed polders. Water International, 40(3), 401–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. B., Rimmer, M. T., & Wittwer, G. (2011). Saving the Southern Murray-Darling Basin: The economic effects of a buyback of irrigation water. The Economic Record, 87, 276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, T., & Kellow, A. J. (1995). Environmental politics and policy making in Australia. Macmillan Education AU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, A., Vanclay, F., Hiller, C., & Wilson, S. (2014). Challenging dominant discourses of climate change. Climatic Change, 127(3–4), 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, X., Muro, M., Ribas, A., Llausàs, A., Jeffrey, P., & Saurí, D. (2013). Attitudes and behaviours towards water conservation on the Mediterranean coast: The role of socio-demographic and place-attachment factors. Water International, 38(3), 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrick, D., Whitten, S. M., & Coggan, A. (2013). Understanding the evolution and performance of water markets and allocation policy: A transaction costs analysis framework. Ecological Economics, 88, 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q., & Horne, J. (2014). Water markets in the Murray-Darling Basin. Agricultural Water Management, 145, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q., & Jiang, Q. (2011). Economic effects of water recovery on irrigated agriculture in the Murray-Darling Basin. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55(4), 487–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q., & Hussey, K. (2007). Buying back the living Murray: at what price? Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 14(2), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q., Libecap, G. D., Edwards, E. C., O’Brienf, R. J., & Landry, C. (2012). Comparative assessment of water markets: Insights from the Murray-Darling Basin of Australia and the Western USA. Water Policy, 14(2), 175–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, R. Q., Pittock, J., Davis, R., Williams, J., Fu, G., Warburton, M., Udall, B., Mckenzie, R., Yu, X., Che, N., Connell, D., Jiang, Q., Kompas, T., Lynch, A., Norris, R., Possingham, H., & Quiggin, J. (2013). Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M. A. (1995). The historical roots of ecological modernization. In M. A. Hajer (Ed.), The politics of environmental discourse (pp. 73–103). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., & Wreford, A. (2011). Adaptation to climate change: The attitudes of stakeholders in the livestock industry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B. T., Alexandra, J., Bond, N. R. Byron, N., Marsh, R., Pollino, C. A., Stewardson, Michael, J. (2021). Chapter 18 - The way forward: Continuing policy and management reforms in the Murray–Darling Basin. In B. T. Hart, N. R. Bond, N. Byron, C. A. Pollino, Michael J. Stewardson (Eds.), Ecohydrology from catchment to coast, Murray-Darling Basin, Australia, (vol. 1, pp. 389–429) Elsevier.

  • Harley, C., Metcalf, L., & Irwin, J. (2014). An exploratory study in community perspectives of sustainability leadership in the Murray Darling Basin. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10(2), 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPSEC, Panel Report: Independent Assessment of Social and Economic Conditions in the Basin (Draft) (2020) Report Prepared by the Independent Panel for the Assessment of Social and Economic Conditions in the Basin, Canberra, 89

  • Jiang, Q., & Grafton, R. Q. (2012). Economic effects of climate change in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Agricultural Systems, 110, 10–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiem, A. S. (2013). Drought and water policy in Australia: Challenges for the future illustrated by the issues associated with water trading and climate change adaptation in the Murray-Darling Basin. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1615–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. M. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D. (2001). The era of management is over. Ecosystems, 4(8), 758–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massicotte, M.-J. (2010). La VÍa Campesina, Brazilian peasants, and the agribusiness model of agriculture: Towards an alternative model of agrarian democratic governance. Studies in Political Economy, 85(1), 69–98.

  • Mehta, J. (2013). How paradigms create politics: The transformation of american educational policy, 1980–2001. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 285–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moock, J. L., & Rhoades, R. E. (1992). Diversity, farmer knowledge, and sustainability.

  • O'Brien, K. L. (2009). Do values subjectively define the limits to climate change adaptation? Adapting to Climate Change - Thresholds, Values, Governance, (pp. 164–170).

  • Ostrom, E. (2012). The future of the commons: Beyond market failure and government regulation. The Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, B. (2014). Dark Emu: Black seeds: Agriculture or accident? Magabala Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis investigating processes of social construction. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittock, J., & Connell, D. (2010). Australia Demonstrates the Planet’s Future: Water and Climate in the Murray-Darling Basin. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26(4), 561–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollino, C. A., Hart, B. T., Nolan, M., Byron, N., Marsh, R. (2021). Chapter 2 - Rural and regional communities of the Murray–Darling Basin, In B. T. Hart, N. R. Bond, N. Byron, C. A. Pollino, Michael J. Stewardson, (eds.), Ecohydrology from catchment to coast, Murray-Darling Basin, Australia, (vol. 1, pp. 21–46) Elsevier.

  • Productivity Commission (2010). Market Mechanisms for Recovering Water in the Murray-Darling Basin. Final Report (Canberra, Productivity Commission).

  • Qureshi, M. E., Schwabe, K., Connor, J., & Kirby, M. (2010). Environmental water incentive policy and return flows. Water Resources Research46(4)

  • Qureshi, M. E., Grafton, R. Q., Kirby, M., & Hanjra, M. A. (2011). Understanding irrigation water use efficiency at different scales for better policy reform: A case study of the Murray-Darling Basin. Australia. Water Policy, 13(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Institute of Urban & Regional Development, University of California

  • Robbins, P. T. (2003). Transnational corporations and the discourse of water privatization. Journal of International Development, 15(8), 1073–1082.

  • Robinson, C. J., Bark, R. H., Garrick, D., & Pollino, C. A. (2015). Sustaining local values through river basin governance: Community-based initiatives in Australia’s Murray-Darling basin. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(12), 2212–2227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. M., & Buchy, W. P. (2002). Laying down the ladder: A typology of public participation in Australian natural resource management. Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 9(4), 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Mallen, I., & Corbera, E. (2013). Community-based conservation and traditional ecological knowledge: Implications for social-ecological resilience. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, J. L. (1994). Understanding transfers: Community rights and the privatization of water. West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, 1, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1999). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed, Intro. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steelman. T (2016). Adaptive governance. In Handbook on Theories of Governance (pp. 538–550). Edward Elgar Publishing.

  • Swirepik, J. L., Burns, I. C., Dyer, F. J., Neave, I. A., O’Brien, M. G., Pryde, G. M., & Thompson, R. M. (2016). Establishing environmental water requirements for the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia’s largest developed river system. River Research and Applications, 32(6), 1153–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turton, A. (2016). Untying the Gordian Knot: Unintended consequences of water policy for the gold mining industry in South Africa. Water International, 41(3), 330–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vela-Almeida, D., Kuijk, F., Wyseure, G., & Kosoy, N. (2016). Lessons from Yanacocha: assessing mining impacts on hydrological systems and water distribution in the Cajamarca region, Peru. Water International, 41(3), 426–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venot, J. P. (2014). Rethinking commons management in Sub-Saharan West Africa: Public authority and participation in the agricultural water sector. Water International, 39(4), 534–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. A., & Cheesman, J. (2013). Key findings from a survey of sellers to the restoring the balance programme. Economic Papers (economic Society of Australia), 32(3), 340–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H. (2016). Can water users’ associations improve water governance in China? A tale of two villages in the Shiyang River basin. Water International, 41(7), 966–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. (2020). Spatial and Temporal patterns in volunteer data contribution activities: A case study of eBird. International Journal of Geographic Information, 9(10), 597.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Partial financial support was received for this research from the Australian Endeavor Scholarship, the Ontario Graduate Scholarship, and the Carleton University Department of Political Science Graduate Scholarship. Charles Sturt University acted as host institution during the authors time in Australia. The author has no affiliations with or personal involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The views expressed and interpretations of notes made during interviews are strictly those of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Human and Animal Rights

This study involved human participants and was in accordance with the ethical standards of the affiliated university.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shankland, A. Community-Centred Environmental Discourse: Redefining Water Management in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia. J Agric Environ Ethics 37, 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-024-09926-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-024-09926-0

Keywords

Navigation