Skip to main content
Log in

Governance and Standardization in Fish Value Chains: Do They Take Care of Key Animal Welfare Issues?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the extent to which Global Value Chain (GVC) governance may lead to animal welfare (AW) improvement and help to alleviate animal suffering in food producing chains. Our approach relied on scrutinizing two of the most used compulsory certification templates which are enforced by major buyers to their suppliers in order to assure responsible activity in the farmed fish chain (GlobalG.A.P. certification scheme) and in the wild-captured fish chain (Marine Stewardship Council—MSC). Since fish may experience intense suffering in regular activities involved in catching, maintenance, transport and management, we analyzed whether those instruments can contribute to improve the welfare of fish. Although positive outcomes may be expected in aquaculture production, serious welfare issues regarding wild-capture fish are brought to the fore and preliminary action is proposed. We present recommendations for improving the positive impacts of such certification schemes in GVCs and argue that sustainability-driven standards (MSC) could also embrace more AW-focused criteria in order to contribute with reducing unnecessary animal suffering in the fish chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GGR conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing, visualization, supervision. CFMM validation, writing—review & editing. APOS methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing, visualization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Germano Glufke Reis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reis, G.G., Molento, C.F.M. & Souza, A.P.O. Governance and Standardization in Fish Value Chains: Do They Take Care of Key Animal Welfare Issues?. J Agric Environ Ethics 34, 30 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09870-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09870-3

Keywords

Navigation