Should Scientific Research Involving Decapod Crustaceans Require Ethical Review?

Abstract

Decapod crustaceans are faceless animals with five pairs of legs, an external skeleton and multiple nerve centres (ganglia) rather than a single brain (as in vertebrates). They include common seafood species such as crayfish, crabs, lobsters, prawns and shrimp. These characteristics make them difficult to empathise with and consequently legal protection of decapods ranges from strong (Norway and New Zealand), through circumstantial (Australia and Italy) to non-existent (in many other countries). Whether they are capable of experiencing pain depends on definitions and the requirement for absolute proof of an inherently subjective psychological experience. Yet like other animals, decapods fulfil neuroanatomical, pharmacological and behavioural criteria that are consistent with a pain response. Whether they experience stress, harm and distress is less controversial because these conditions are more measurable than the pain response. To balance animal welfare concerns with scientific merit whilst providing confidence for the growing public awareness of crustacean welfare, use of decapod crustaceans in research should require ethical review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. ACT legislation. (1992). http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/1992-45/. Accessed 29 May, 2018.

  2. Animals Australia. (2017). The shocking practice that shows prawn farming is as cruel as factory farming. http://www.animalsaustralia.org/features/prawn-farming.php. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  3. Appel, M., & Elwood, R. W. (2009). Motivational trade-offs and potential pain experience in hermit crabs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 119, 120–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barr, S., & Elwood, R. W. (2011). No evidence of morphine analgesia to noxious shock in the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. Behavioural Processes, 86, 340–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barr, S., Laming, P. R., Dick, J. T. A., & Elwood, R. W. (2008). Nociception or pain in a decapod crustacean? Animal Behaviour, 75, 745–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bateson, P. (1991). Assessment of pain in animals. Animal Behaviour, 42, 827–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergamo, P., Maldonado, H., & Miralto, A. (1992). Opiate effect on the threat display in the crab Carcinus mediterraneus. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 42, 323–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bergmann, M., Taylor, A. C., & Geoffrey Moore, P. (2001). Physiological stress in decapod crustaceans (Munida rugosa and Liocarcinus depurator) discarded in the Clyde Nephrops fishery. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 259, 215–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bioscience Sector. (2009). A bioscience sector response to the house of lords European Union Committee Inquiry: Revision of directive 86/609 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtx055911.pdf. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  10. Birch, J. (2017a). Crabs and lobsters deserve protection from being cooked alive. https://aeon.co/ideas/crabs-and-lobsters-deserve-protection-from-being-cooked-alive. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  11. Birch, J. (2017b). Animal sentience and the precautionary principle. Animal Sentience, 16, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Birch, J. (2017c). Refining the precautionary framework. Animal Sentience, 16, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Browman, H. I., & Skiftesvik, A. B. (2011). Welfare of aquatic organisms: Is there some faith-based HARKing going on here? Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 94, 255–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burnett, N. P., Seabra, R., de Pirro, M., Wethey, D. S., Woodin, S. A., Helmuth, B., et al. (2013). An improved noninvasive method for measuring heartbeat of intertidal animals. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 11, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Caines, K. (2017). Court backs lobster cruelty fine against Sydney Fish Markets store. https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/central-sydney/court-backs-lobster-cruelty-fine-against-sydney-fish-markets-store/news-story/4ab791afd3d803895eac503b6a49c335. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  16. Císař, P., Saberioon, M., Kozák, P., & Pautsina, A. (2018). Fully contactless system for crayfish heartbeat monitoring: Undisturbed crayfish as bio-indicator. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 255, 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crustacean Compassion. (2018). Campaigning for the humane treatment of crabs, lobsters and other decapod crustaceans in the UK. https://www.crustaceancompassion.org.uk/. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  18. Derbyshire, D. (2017). Prawns do feel pain, say scientists. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-492323/Prawns-feel-pain-say-scientists.html. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  19. Deutsche Welle. (2018). Switzerland bans boiling live lobsters in animal welfare reform. http://www.dw.com/en/switzerland-bans-boiling-live-lobsters-in-animal-welfare-reform/a-42104175. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  20. Diarte-Plata, G., Sainz-Hernández, J. C., Aguiñaga-Cruz, J. A., Fierro-Coronado, J. A., Polanco-Torres, A., & Puente-Palazuelos, C. (2012). Eyestalk ablation procedures to minimize pain in the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium americanum. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 140, 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Diggles, B. K. (2018). Review of some scientific issues related to crustacean welfare. ICES Journal of Marine Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Diggles, B. K., Arlinghaus, R., Browman, H. I., Cooke, S. J., Cowx, I. G., Kasumyan, A. O., et al. (2017). Responses of larval zebrafish to low pH immersion assay. Comment on Lopez-Luna, et al. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 220, 3191–3192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elwood, R. W. (2016). Stress was never said to be pain: response to Stevens et al. (2016). Biology Letters, 12, 20160126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Elwood, R. W. (2017). Assessing negative and positive evidence for animal pain. Animal Sentience, 16, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Elwood, R. W., & Adams, L. (2015). Electric shock causes physiological stress responses in shore crabs, consistent with prediction of pain. Biology Letters, 11, 20150800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Elwood, R. W., Barr, S., & Patterson, L. (2009). Pain and stress in crustaceans? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118, 128–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Elwood, R. W., Dalton, N., & Riddell, G. (2017). Aversive responses by shore crabs to acetic acid but not to capsaicin. Behavioural Processes, 140, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. European Food Safety, A. (2005). Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the commission related to the aspects of the biology and welfare of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. EFSA Journal, 3, 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. European Parliament and of the Council. (2010). Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32010L0063. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  30. Flecknell, P. (2002). Replacement, reduction and refinement. Altex, 19, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fox News. (2017). Seafood company convicted of animal cruelty for improperly killing lobster. http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2017/03/10/seafood-company-convicted-animal-cruelty-for-improperly-killing-lobster.html. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  32. Global Aquaculture Alliance. (2016a). Seajoy’s ablation-free shrimp answers emerging welfare concern. https://www.aquaculturealliance.org/advocate/seajoys-ablation-free-shrimp-answers-emerging-welfare-concern/?PageSpeed=noscript. Accessed 28 May, 2018.

  33. Global Aquaculture Alliance. (2016b). Stirling researcher preps eyestalk-ablation alternative trials. https://www.aquaculturealliance.org/advocate/stirling-researcher-preps-eyestalk-ablation-alternative-trials/?PageSpeed=noscript. Accessed 28 May, 2018.

  34. Greenwood, A. (2017). A seafood company killed a lobster—And was convicted of animal cruelty. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2017/03/07/a-seafood-company-killed-a-lobster-and-was-convicted-of-animal-cruelty. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  35. Hopkins, P. M. (2012). The eyes have it: A brief history of crustacean neuroendocrinology. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 175, 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. International Association for the Study of Pain. https://www.iasp-pain.org/terminology?navItemNumber=576#Pain. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  37. Key, B., Arlinghaus, R., Browman, H. I., Cooke, S. J., Cowx, I. G., Diggles, B. K., et al. (2017). Problems with equating thermal preference with ‘emotional fever’ and sentience: Comment on ‘Fish can show emotional fever: Stress-induced hyperthermia in zebrafish’ by Rey, et al. (2015). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20160681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar, B., Manuja, A., & Aich, P. (2012). Stress and its impact on farm animals. Front Biosci (Elite Ed), 4, 1759–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liuzzo, G., Rossi, R., Giacometti, F., Mescolini, G., Piva, S., & Serraino, A. (2017). Analysis of provincial and municipal regulations governing crustacean welfare in Italy. Italian Journal of Food Safety, 6, 6228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lozada, M., Romano, A., & Maldonado, H. (1988). Effect of morphine and naloxone on a defensive response of the crab Chasmagnathus granulatus. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 30, 635–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Magee, B., & Elwood, R. W. (2013). Shock avoidance by discrimination learning in the shore crab (Carcinus maenas) is consistent with a key criterion for pain. Journal of Experimental Biology, 216, 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Magee, B., & Elwood, R. W. (2016). Trade-offs between predator avoidance and electric shock avoidance in hermit crabs demonstrate a non-reflexive response to noxious stimuli consistent with prediction of pain. Behavioural Processes, 130, 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. National Health and Medical Research Council. (2013). Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/ea28. Accessed 28 May, 2018.

  44. National Research Council of the National Academies. (2011). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/guide-for-the-care-and-use-of-laboratory-animals.pdf. Accessed 28 May, 2018.

  45. New Zealand legislation ‘Animal Welfare Act. (1999). http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1999/0142/latest/whole.html. Accessed 28 May, 2018.

  46. Nicholls, S. (2018). Swiss law bans boiling lobsters alive. http://www.euronews.com/2018/01/11/swiss-law-bans-boiling-lobsters-alive. Accessed 29 May, 2018.

  47. Norway legislation ‘Animal Welfare Act. (2010). https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/animal-welfare-act/id571188/. Accessed 25 May, 2018.

  48. NSW legislation. (1979). NSW Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979 No 200. https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/act/1979/200/part1/sec4. Accessed 25 May, 2018.

  49. NT legislation ‘Animal Welfare Act.’ https://legislation.nt.gov.au/Legislation/ANIMAL-WELFARE-ACT. Accessed 25 May, 2018.

  50. Patterson, L., Dick, J. T. A., & Elwood, R. W. (2007). Physiological stress responses in the edible crab, Cancer pagurus, to the fishery practice of de-clawing. Marine Biology, 152, 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. PETA Australia. (2017). Ground-breaking case: Seafood store convicted for cruelty to Lobster. https://www.peta.org.au/news/nicholas-seafood-convicted-cruelty-lobster/. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  52. Prescott, M. J., & Lidster, K. (2017). Improving quality of science through better animal welfare: The NC3Rs strategy. Lab Anim (NY), 46, 152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Puri, S., & Faulkes, Z. (2010). Do decapod crustaceans have nociceptors for extreme pH? PLoS ONE, 5, e10244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Queensland legislation. (2001). Animal Care and Protection Act 2001. http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdb/au/legis/qld/consol_act/acapa2001229/. Accessed 25 May, 2018.

  55. Queensland legislation. (2012). Animal Care and protection regulation 2012. http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_reg/acapr2012320/. Accessed 25 May, 2018.

  56. Rose, J. D., Arlinghaus, R., Cooke, S. J., Diggles, B. K., Sawynok, W., Stevens, E. D., et al. (2014). Can fish really feel pain? Fish and Fisheries, 15, 97–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. RSPCA Australia. (2018). What is the most humane way to kill crustaceans for human consumption? http://kb.rspca.org.au/What-is-the-most-humane-way-to-kill-crustaceans-for-human-consumption_625.html. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  58. Sainz-Hernández, J. C., Racotta, I. S., Dumas, S., & Hernández-López, J. (2008). Effect of unilateral and bilateral eyestalk ablation in Litopenaeus vannamei male and female on several metabolic and immunologic variables. Aquaculture, 283, 188–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Seajoy ‘Non Ablation.’ http://www.seajoy.com/index.php/sustainable/non-ablation. Accessed 28 May, 2018.

  60. Sneddon, L. U. (2009). Pain perception in fish: Indicators and endpoints. ILAR Journal, 50, 338–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sneddon, L. U. (2015). Pain in aquatic animals. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 218, 967–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sneddon, L. U., Elwood, R. W., Adamo, S. A., & Leach, M. C. (2014). Defining and assessing animal pain. Animal Behaviour, 97, 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sneddon, L. U., & Leach, M. C. (2016). Anthropomorphic denial of fish pain. Animal Sentience, 3, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sneddon, L. U., Lopez-Luna, J., Wolfenden, D. C. C., Leach, M. C., Valentim, A. M., Steenbergen, P. J., et al. (2017). Response to: Responses of larval zebrafish to low pH immersion assay. Comment on Lopez-Luna, et al. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 220, 3192–3194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Stelling, T. (2014). Do lobsters and other invertebrates feel pain? New research has some answers. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/do-lobsters-and-other-invertebrates-feel-pain-new-research-has-some-answers/2014/03/07/f026ea9e-9e59-11e3-b8d8-94577ff66b28_story.html. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  66. Stevens, E. D., Arlinghaus, R., Browman, H. I., Cooke, S. J., Cowx, I. G., Diggles, B. K., et al. (2016). Stress is not pain. Comment on Elwood and Adams (2015) ‘Electric shock causes physiological stress responses in shore crabs, consistent with prediction of pain’. Biology Letters, 12, 20151006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Stevens, E. D., & Diggles, B. K. (2016). Stress must not be confused with pain. http://atlasofscience.org/stress-must-not-be-confused-with-pain/. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  68. Tannenbaum, J., & Bennett, B. T. (2015). Russell and Burch’s 3Rs then and now: The need for clarity in definition and purpose. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 54, 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

  69. The Fish Site. (2016). Will ablation-free shrimp become a reality? https://thefishsite.com/articles/will-ablationfree-shrimp-become-a-reality. Accessed 28 May, 2018.

  70. Tomlinson, M. (2018). Open letter to Rt Hon Michael Gove MP. https://www.crustaceancompassion.org.uk/. Accessed 28 May, 2018.

  71. Victoria legislation. (1986). Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1986. http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/poctaa1986360/index.html. Accessed 25 May, 2018.

  72. Zhou, N. (2017). Sydney fishmonger convicted of animal cruelty over lobster treatment. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/15/sydney-fishmonger-convicted-of-animal-cruelty-over-lobster-treatment. Accessed 30 May, 2018.

  73. Zimmerman, M. (1986). Physiological mechanisms of pain and its treatment. Klinische Anaesthesiol Intensivether, 32, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Robyn Hall, Alison Small and Sharyn Zrna for helpful discussions while writing this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony Rowe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rowe, A. Should Scientific Research Involving Decapod Crustaceans Require Ethical Review?. J Agric Environ Ethics 31, 625–634 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9750-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Animal
  • Decapod
  • Ethics
  • Pain
  • Physiology
  • Nociceptor