Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture: Reconciling the Epistemological, Ethical, Political, and Practical Challenges

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide further clarity to the technical and policy difficulties associated with mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture by identifying and distilling the core tensions which propagate and animate them. We argue that these complexities exist across four critical dimensions: the epistemological, the ethical, the political, and the practical. Adequately confronting the challenge of agricultural emissions will require improved transparency in emissions measurement, increased science communication, enhanced public participatory mechanisms, and the integration of ethical deliberation in scientific and policy discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arbuckle, J. G., Prokopy, L. S., Haigh, T., Hobbs, J., Knoot, T., Knutson, C., et al. (2013). Climate change beliefs, concerns, and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation among farmers in the Midwestern United States. Climatic Change, 117(4), 943–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkin, D. (2013). Trade, tastes, and nutrition in India. The American Economic Review, 103(5), 1629–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blandford, D., & Hassapoyannes, K. (2015). A new global climate agreement: Implications for agriculture? EuroChoices, 14(2), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter, S. M., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1316–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein, S. (2006). Institutionalizing the new politics of difference in US biomedical research: Thinking across the science/state/society divides. In S. Frickel & K. Moore (Eds.), The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks and power. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hess, D. J. (2007). Alternative pathways in science and industry. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hess, D. J. (2009). The potentials and limitations of civil society research: Getting undone science done. Sociological Inquiry, 79(3), 306–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Laestadius, L. I., Neff, R. A., Barry, C. L., & Frattaroli, S. (2014). “We don’t tell people what to do”: An examination of the factors influencing NGO decisions to campaign for reduced meat consumption in light of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 29, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lambert, C. (2006). The marketplace of perceptions. Harvard Magazine, 108(4), 50.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rivera-Ferre, M., López-i-Gelats, F., Howden, M., Smith, P., Morton, J., & Herrero, M. (2016). Re-framing the climate change debate in the livestock sector: Mitigation and adaptation options. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(6), 869–892.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The environment, from surplus to scarcity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stone, L. (2008). Epistemology. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research, 1, 264–268.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thompson, P. B. (2015). From field to fork: Food ethics for everyone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank David Blandford, Katharina Hassapoyannes, Clare Hinrichs, Carolyn Sachs, Arie Sanders, Paul B. Thompson, Wes Eaton, Leslie Pillen, and Heidrun Moschitz for their very useful comments and contributions to our group discussions. Any errors or omissions are the authors’ alone. This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under Project PEN04437 and Accession number 1012188.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. Chiles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiles, R.M., Fabian, E.E., Tobin, D. et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture: Reconciling the Epistemological, Ethical, Political, and Practical Challenges. J Agric Environ Ethics 31, 341–348 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9728-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Agricultural ethics
  • Climate change
  • Emissions measurement
  • Climate justice
  • Sustainability
  • Epistemology
  • Food politics
  • Governance
  • Science and technology studies