Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture: Reconciling the Epistemological, Ethical, Political, and Practical Challenges
The purpose of this paper is to provide further clarity to the technical and policy difficulties associated with mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture by identifying and distilling the core tensions which propagate and animate them. We argue that these complexities exist across four critical dimensions: the epistemological, the ethical, the political, and the practical. Adequately confronting the challenge of agricultural emissions will require improved transparency in emissions measurement, increased science communication, enhanced public participatory mechanisms, and the integration of ethical deliberation in scientific and policy discussions.
KeywordsAgricultural ethics Climate change Emissions measurement Climate justice Sustainability Epistemology Food politics Governance Science and technology studies
The authors would like to thank David Blandford, Katharina Hassapoyannes, Clare Hinrichs, Carolyn Sachs, Arie Sanders, Paul B. Thompson, Wes Eaton, Leslie Pillen, and Heidrun Moschitz for their very useful comments and contributions to our group discussions. Any errors or omissions are the authors’ alone. This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Federal Appropriations under Project PEN04437 and Accession number 1012188.
- Epstein, S. (2006). Institutionalizing the new politics of difference in US biomedical research: Thinking across the science/state/society divides. In S. Frickel & K. Moore (Eds.), The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks and power. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- Hess, D. J. (2007). Alternative pathways in science and industry. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lambert, C. (2006). The marketplace of perceptions. Harvard Magazine, 108(4), 50.Google Scholar
- Rivera-Ferre, M., López-i-Gelats, F., Howden, M., Smith, P., Morton, J., & Herrero, M. (2016). Re-framing the climate change debate in the livestock sector: Mitigation and adaptation options. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7(6), 869–892.Google Scholar
- Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The environment, from surplus to scarcity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stone, L. (2008). Epistemology. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research, 1, 264–268.Google Scholar