Precaution and Fairness: A Framework for Distributing Costs of Protection from Environmental Risks
- 194 Downloads
While there is an extensive literature on how the precautionary principle should be interpreted and when precautions should be taken, relatively little discussion exists about the fair distribution of costs of taking precautions. We address this issue by proposing a general framework for deciding how costs of precautions should be shared, which consists of a series of default principles that are triggered according to desert, rights, and ability to pay. The framework is developed with close attention to the pragmatics of how distributions will affect actual behaviours. It is intended to help decision-makers think more systematically about distributional consequences of taking precautionary measures, thereby to improve decision-making. Two case studies—one about a ban on turtle fishing in Costa Rica, and one about a deep-sea mining project in Papua New Guinea—are given to show how the framework can be applied.
KeywordsThe precautionary principle Fair distribution Environment Deep-sea mining Endangered sea-turtles
- AIDA. (2004). Costa Rica turtles. Interamerican Association for Environmental Defense. http://www.aida-americas.org/aida.php?page=70&lang=en. Accessed 5 May 2017.
- Birney, K., Griffin, A., Gwiazda, J., Kefauver, J., Nagai, T., & Varchol, D. (2006). Potential deep-sea mining of seafloor massive sulfides: A case study in Papua New Guinea. Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management Thesis.Google Scholar
- Castro, R. (2005). Protection of sea turtles: Putting the precautionary principle into practice. In R. Cooney & B. Dickson (Eds.), Biodiversity and the precautionary principle: Risk and uncertainty in conservation and sustainable use. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Dickson, B. (2005). Fairness and the costs and benefits of precautionary action. In B. Dickson & R. Cooney (Eds.), Biodiversity and the precautionary principle: Risk and uncertainty in conservation and sustainable use. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- ECORYS Nederland BV. (2014). Study to investigate state of knowledge of deep sea mining. Final report annex 6 environmental analysis.Google Scholar
- Filer, C., & Gabriel, J. (1987). How could nautilus minerals get a social licence to operate the world’s first deep sea mine? Marine Policy (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- Gaines, S. E. (1991). The polluter-pays principle: From economic equity to environmental ethos. Texas International Law Journal, 26(1991), 463.Google Scholar
- Lamont, J., & Favor, C. (2016). Distributive justice. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Winter 2016 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/justice-distributive/. Accessed 5 May 2017.
- Miller, D. (1976). Social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Miller, D. (2008). ‘Global justice and climate change: How should responsibilities be distributed?’, Tanner Lectures, delivered at Tsinhua University Beijing. March 24–25, 2008.Google Scholar
- Nautilus Minerals. (2008). Environmental impact statement. Nautilius Minerals Niugini Limited. Solwara 1 Project. http://www.nautilusminerals.com/irm/content/pdf/environment-reports/Environmental Impact Statement - Main Report.pdf.
- Nozick, R. (2013). Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- OECD. (1972). Guiding principles concerning international economic aspects of environmental policies, Recommendation C(72)128, Adopted May 26, 1972, Reprinted in 11 I.L.M. 1172 (1972).Google Scholar
- O’Riordan, T. (1994). Interpreting the precautionary principle (Vol. 2). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Parfit, D. (1982). Future generations: Further problems. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1982, 113–172.Google Scholar
- Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Riley, J. (1989). Justice under capitalism. Nomos, 31(1989), 122–162.Google Scholar
- Rosenbaum, H. (2011). Out of our depth: Mining the ocean floor in Papua New Guinea. MiningWatch Canada.Google Scholar
- Sadurski, W. (1985). Giving desert its due: Social justice and legal theory (Vol. 2)., Law and Philosophy Library Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (2011). The idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Shue, H. (1996). Basic rights: Subsistence, affluence, and us foreign policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Steel, D. (2015). Philosophy and the precautionary principle: Science, evidence, and environmental policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Troëng, S., Chamorro, E., & Silman, R. (2002). Ban and benefits: Tortuguero at 2000. In Paper presented at the proceedings of the twentieth annual symposium on sea turtle biology and conservation. US Dep. Commer. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-SEFSC-477.Google Scholar