An Analysis of Diversity in Nonhuman Animal Rights Media

Abstract

Lack of diversity in the ranks as well as a failure to resonate with disadvantaged groups and other anti-oppression movements has been cited as one important barrier to the American Nonhuman Animal rights movement’s success (Kymlicka and Donaldson in Animal rights, multiculturalism and the Left. The Mellon Sawyer Seminar at the Graduate Center, CUNY. City University of New York, New York, 2013). It is possible that social movements are actively inhibiting diversity in the ranks and audience by producing literature that reflects a narrow activist identity. This article creates a platform from which these larger issues can be explored by investigating the actual demographic representations present in a small sample of popular media sources produced by the movement for other animals. A content analysis of 131 magazine covers produced by two highly visible movement actors, PETA and VegNews, was conducted to demonstrate that activist representations in at least some dominant American Nonhuman Animal rights media are mostly white, female, and thin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    While not all vegans are activists for other animals, and not all activists are vegan, this study explores Nonhuman Animal rights media which is grounded in ethical veganism (veganism that is engaged as a political action against speciesism). The Nonhuman Animal rights movement tends to situate veganism as an idealized lifestyle for advocates, meaning that anti-speciesist and vegan rhetoric often overlap. Therefore, the terms will sometimes be used interchangeably.

  2. 2.

    Scholars acknowledge a distinction between those who advocate politically for Nonhuman Animal rights and those who are vegan or vegetarian for cultural or religious purposes.

  3. 3.

    By way of example, PETA often employs nude or nearly nude Playboy models and volunteers to hold signs or hand out literature and food samples in public spaces. PETA’s “I’d Rather Go Naked Than” ad campaign, featuring pornified images of women, has been a primary tactic since the early 1990s. Smaller groups that have mimicked the PETA approach include Animal Liberation Victoria, Citizens United for Animals, Fish Love, and LUSH Cosmetics Fighting Animal Testing (Wrenn 2015).

  4. 4.

    Importantly, this data may be skewed due to the small response rate of non-white participants.

  5. 5.

    This organization has since rebranded itself as Faunalytics.

  6. 6.

    Much of this research speaks to the “stereotype threat,” whereby stereotypes are internalized by marginalized groups. This is thought to negatively impact their attitudes and behaviors to the effect of fulfilling the stereotypes (Steele and Aronson 1995).

  7. 7.

    Many times “gender neutrality” centers boys and men as the default for humanity.

  8. 8.

    See Dr. John McDougall’s 2008 essay “The Fat Vegan” in the McDougall Newsletter 7 (12) for an example of how thinness is encouraged as a positive representation of the vegan movement.

  9. 9.

    Unfortunately, I was unable to obtain demographic information regarding readership, as PETA does not make this information available. Animal Times has an international readership, but it is produced in America and prioritizes Western culture. VegNews explicitly states on its website that reader information is never shared.

  10. 10.

    Hatton and Trautner’s scheme allows for 23 total points on a sexualization scale. These are grouped into sections on clothing and nudity, touching others or self-touching, pose, position of mouth, exposure of breasts, chest, genitals, and buttocks, nature of accompanying text, head versus body shot, demonstration of a sex act, and sexual role play. Each of these sections accounts for a number of possible indicators that can count towards a point. If five or more points are scored, the image is considered sexualized. If 10 or more are present, it is considered hyper-sexualized.

  11. 11.

    The secondary researcher enlisted for reliability check is a coauthor for a similar study on social movement media that compares data in this study to that of comparable social movements. The researcher is therefore familiar with the study and sampling method. Unfortunately, the identity of the secondary researcher overlaps considerably with that of the primary researcher. Both identify as white cis-gender American women in their early thirties. Due to the similarities in identities, any diversity of interpretation would be limited.

  12. 12.

    The 10 % sample was chosen randomly from each magazine sample. Because race resists categorization and the coding disagreement spoke to racial ambiguity, the researchers were not able to agree on a means of clarifying race categories. No major changes were made to the categories utilized by the primary researcher other than a slightly stronger reliance on the “other/unknown” category.

  13. 13.

    This study included only women, who are more prone to weight gain. This figure also includes semi-vegetarians, which likely inflates percent overweight or obese. Another British study that looks only at obesity (rather than obese and overweight individuals) reports that 3 % of male vegan participants and 5 % of female vegan participants were considered obese (Key and Davey 1996).

  14. 14.

    See Alicia Silverstone’s (2009) The Kind Diet: A Simple Guide to Feeling Great, Losing Weight, and Saving the Planet and Rory Freedman and Kim Barnouin’s (2005) Skinny Bitch: A No-Nonsense Tough-Love Guide for Savvy Girls Who Want to Stop Eating Crap and Start Looking Fabulous!.

  15. 15.

    At this time I am not aware of any research that would confirm this observation, but it is offered as a general reflection on subject representations in the sample.

  16. 16.

    http://www.sistahvegan.com.

  17. 17.

    http://www.foodispower.org.

  18. 18.

    http://www.vine.bravebirds.org.

  19. 19.

    VegNews 2000, November/December (3); VegNews 2001, February (5); Animal Times 2005, Fall.

References

  1. Adams, C. (2004). The pornography of meat. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, C., & Donovan, J. (1995). Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explorations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amenta, E., Caren, N., Olasky, S., & Stobaugh, J. (2009). All the movements fit to print: Who, what, when, where, and why SMO families appeared in the New York Times in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 74, 636–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews, K., & Biggs, M. (2006). The dynamics of protest diffusion: Movement organizations, social networks, and news media in the 1960 sit-ins. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 752–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aubrey, J., Stevens, J., Henson, K., Hopper, M., & Smith, S. (2009). A picture is worth twenty words (about the self): Testing the priming influence of visual sexual objectification on women’s self-objectification. Communication Research Reports, 26, 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, C. (2005). Images of women’s sexuality in advertisements: A content analysis of Black- and white-oriented women’s and men’s magazines. Sex Roles, 52(1/2), 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barcelos, C. (2011). Exclusion and American yoga. Sociological Images. http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/09/14/exclusion-and-american-yoga/. Accessed 6 November 2015.

  8. Beers, D. (2006). For the prevention of cruelty: The history and legacy of animal rights activism in the United States. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Beggan, J., & Allison, S. (2003). ‘What sort of man reads Playboy?’ the self-reported influence of Playboy on the construction of masculinity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 11(2), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bettinger, E., & Long, B. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. The American Economic Review, 95(2), 152–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bierria, A. (2007). Pursuing a radical anti-violence agenda inside/outside a non-profit structure. In INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence (Ed.), The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex (pp. 151–164). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bongiorno, R., Bain, P., & Haslam, N. (2013). When sex doesn’t sell: Using sexualized images of women reduces support for ethical campaigns. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e83311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Business Wire. (2012). Love bites: TODAY.com and Match.com survey reveals singles attitudes on dining and dating. Los Angeles, CA: Business Wire.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cole, M., & Morgan, K. (2011). Veganphobia: Derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK national newspapers. The British Journal of Sociology, 62(1), 134–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins, P. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coltrane, S., & Messineo, M. (2000). The perpetuation of subtle prejudice: Race and gender imagery in 1990s television advertising. Sex roles, 42(5/6), 363–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortese, A. (2008). Provocateur: Images of women and minorities in advertising. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deckha, M. (2008). Disturbing images: PETA and the feminist ethics of animal advocacy. Ethics and the Environment, 13(2), 35–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deckha, M. (2013). Welfarist and imperial: The contributions of anticruelty laws to civilizational discourse. American Quarterly, 65(3), 515–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Doherty, R. (1976). Social-documentary photography in the USA. Garden City, NY: AMPHOTO.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Downing, J. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Drew, A. (2010). Being a sistah at PETA. In B. Harper (Ed.), Sistah vegan: Food, identity, health, and society: Black female vegans speak (pp. 61–64). Brooklyn: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Earl, J., & Schussman, A. (2003). The new site of activism: On-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 24, 155–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Einwohner, R. (1999). Gender, class, and social movement outcomes: Identity and effectiveness in two animal rights campaigns. Gender and Society, 13(1), 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferree, M., & Roth, S. (1998). Gender, class, and the interaction between social movements: A strike of West Berlin day care workers. Gender and Society, 12(6), 626–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Freeman, C. (2009). This little piggy went to press: The American news media’s construction of animals in agriculture. The Communication Review, 12(1), 78–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gaarder, E. (2011). Women and the animal rights movement. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gamson, W. (2004). Bystanders, public opinion, and the media. In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 242–261). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gamson, W., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gamson, W., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gitlin, T. (2003). The media in the unmaking of the new Left. In J. Goodwin & J. Jasper (Eds.), The social movements reader: Cases and concepts (pp. 301–311). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Glasser, C. (2011). Tied oppressions: An analysis of how sexist imagery reinforces speciesist sentiment. The Brock Review, 12(1), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Glasser, C. (2014). Delivering our message: How advocates impact message reception. Humane Thinking. http://spot.humaneresearch.org/content/dont-shoot-messenger-perceptions-hunters-and-circus-goers. Accessed 6 November 2015.

  35. Glick, M. (2013). Animal instincts: Race, criminality, and the reversal of the ‘human’. American Quarterly, 65(3), 639–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Graham, E. (2014). More than condoms and sandwiches: A feminist investigation on the contradictory promises of harm reduction approaches to prostitution. Dissertation. Vancouver, CA: The University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Groesz, L., Levine, M., & Murnen, S. (2002). The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Groves, J. (2001). Animal rights and the politics of emotion: Folk constructions of emotion in the animal rights movement. In J. Goodwin, J. Jasper, & J. Poletta (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements (pp. 212–232). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gutbrod, H. (2013). Who views vegetarians and vegans positively? New poll results. Humane Thinking. Olympia, WA: Humane Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hall, L. (2006). Capers in the churchyard: Animal rights advocacy in the age of terror. Darien, CT: Nectar Bat Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Harper, B. (2010). Sistah vegan: Food, identity, health, and society: Black female vegans speak. Brooklyn: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? the sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 256–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Heather. (2011). Vegans. I need to talk to you. Fat girl posing. http://fatgirlposing.blogspot.com/2011/05/vegans-i-need-to-talk-to-you.html. Accessed 6 November 2015.

  44. Held, G. (2005). Magazine covers – a multimodal pretext-genre. Folia Linguistica, 39(1–2), 173–196.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Holmstrom, A. (2004). The effects of the media on body image: A meta-analysis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48, 196–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Holtzman, L. (2000). Media messages: What film, television, and popular music teach us about race, class, gender, and sexual orientation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  47. hooks, b. (1994). Outlaw culture: Resisting representations. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jasper, J. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jasper, J., & Poulsen, J. (1993). Fighting back: Vulnerabilities, blunders, and countermobilization by the targets in three animal rights campaigns. Sociological Forum, 8(4), 639–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jasper, J., & Poulsen, J. (1995). Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems, 42(4), 493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Johnson, K. (1990). Impressions of personality based on body forms: An application of Hillestad’s model of appearance. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(4), 34–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kalof, L. (1999). The effects of gender and music video imagery on sexual attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 378–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Key, T., & Davey, G. (1996). Prevalence of obesity is low in people who do not eat meat. British Medical Journal, 313(7060), 816–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kocięda, A. (2015). #BlackVegansRock: 100 Black vegans to check out. Striving with Systems: Intersectional Perspectives on Total Liberation. http://strivingwithsystems.com/2015/06/11/blackvegansrock-100-black-vegans-to-check-out/. Accessed 6 November 2015.

  55. Kymlicka, W., & Donaldson, S. (2013). Animal rights, multiculturalism and the Left. New York, NY: The Mellon Sawyer Seminar at the Graduate Center, CUNY, City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lockwood, P. (2006). ‘Someone like me can be successful’: Do college students need same-gender role models? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Luke, B. (2007). Brutal: Manhood and the exploitation of animals. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lundblad, M. (2013). The birth of a jungle: Animality in progressive-era U.S. literature and culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. MacKay, N., & Covell, K. (1997). The impact of women in advertisements on attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 36, 573–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Malamuth, N., & Check, J. (1981). The effects of mass media exposure on acceptance of violence against women: A field experiment. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 436–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Malkin, A., Wornian, K., & Chrisler, J. (1999). Women and weight: Gendered messages on magazine covers. Sex Roles, 40(718), 647–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Marx, D., Ko, S., & Friedman, R. (2009). The ‘Obama effect’: How a salient role model reduces race-based performance differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 953–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mastro, D., & Greenberg, B. (2000). The portrayal of racial minorities on prime time television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44(4), 690–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mastro, D., & Stern, S. (2003). Representations of race in television commercials: A content analysis of prime-time advertising. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47(4), 638–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Maurer, D. (2002). Vegetarianism: Movement or moment?. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  66. McCarthy, J., McPhail, C., & Smith, J. (1996). Images of protest: Dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 478–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. McLaren, L. (2007). Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29(1), 29–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Monk-Turner, E., Heiserman, M., Johnson, C., Cotton, V., & Jackson, M. (2010). The portrayal of racial minorities on prime time television: A replication of the Mastro and Greenberg study a decade later. Studies in Popular Culture, 32(2), 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Morry, M., & Staska, S. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(4), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Mundorf, N., D’Alessio, D., Allen, M., & Emmers-Sommer, T. (2007). Effects of sexually explicit media. In R. Preiss, B. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 181–198). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  71. National Association for Multi-Ethnicity in Communications. (2013). NAMIC and WICT cable telecommunications industry workforce diversity survey. http://namic.com/research/img/FinalExecutivesummary.pdf. Accessed 6 November 2015.

  72. Newby, P., Tucker, K., & Wolk, A. (2005). Risk of overweight and obesity among semivegetarian, lactovegetarian, and vegan women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 81(6), 1267–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Oliver, P., & Maney, G. (2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 463–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Paoletti, J. (2012). Pink and blue: Telling the boys from the girls in America. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Park, E. (2014). Yoga and diversity. Film. Toronto, CA: Global Mind Body.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Phelps, N. (2007). The longest struggle: Animal advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA. New York, NY: Lantern Books.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Povey, R., Wellens, B., & Conner, M. (2001). Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian, and vegan diets: An examination of the role of ambivalence. Appetite, 37(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Puhl, R., Andreyeva, T., & Brownell, K. (2008). Perceptions of weight discrimination: Prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 992–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Puhl, R., & Heuer, C. (2010). Obesity stigma: Important considerations for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 100(6), 1019–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Regan, T. (1996). The future of animal rights. Lecture. The University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. http://www.animalsvoice.com/regan/?p=588. Accessed 6 November 2015.

  81. Regan, T. (2004). Empty cages: Facing the challenge of animal rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Roscigno, V., & Danaher, W. (2001). Media and mobilization: The case of radio and southern textile worker insurgency, 1929 to 1934. American Sociological Review, 66(1), 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Sampedro, V. (1997). The media politics of social protest. Mobilization, 2(2), 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Socha, K., & Blum, S. (Eds.). (2013). Confronting animal exploitation: Grassroots essays on liberation and veganism. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Sorenson, J. (2011). The myth of ‘animal rights terrorism’. The Brock Review, 12(1), 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Spiker, T. (2003). Cover coverage: How US magazine covers captured the emotions of the September 11 attacks—and how editors and art directors decided on those themes. Journal of Magazine and New Media Research, 5(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Steele, C., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. The Humane League. (2014). Diet change and demographic characteristics of vegans, vegetarians, semi-vegetarians, and omnivores. Philadelphia, PA: The Humane League.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Torres, B. (2006). Making a killing: The political economy of animal rights. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Turner, S., Hamilton, H., Jacobs, M., Angood, L., & Dwyer, D. (1997). The influence of fashion magazines on the body image satisfaction of college women: An exploratory analysis. Adolescence, 32, 603–614.

    Google Scholar 

  92. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). People QuickFacts. USA. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html. Accessed 6 November 2015.

  93. Wilson, D. (2009). Racial prejudice and the performing animals controversy in early twentieth-century Britain. Society and Animals, 17, 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Wilson, C, I. I., & Gutiérrez, F. (1995). Race, multiculturalism, and the media: From mass to class communication. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Wrenn, C. L. (2012). Applying social movement theory to nonhuman rights mobilization. Peace Studies Journal, 5(3), 27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Wrenn, C. L. (2015). The role of professionalization regarding female exploitation in the nonhuman animal rights movement. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(2), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Wrenn, C. L. (2016a). Professionalization, factionalism, and social movement success: A case study on nonhuman animal rights mobilization. Sociology. Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University. Doctor of Philosophy.

  98. Wrenn, C. L. (2016b). A rational approach to animal rights: Extensions in abolitionist theory. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

  99. Zagorsky, J. (2004). Is obesity as dangerous to your wealth as to your health? Research on Aging, 26(1), 130–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is part of a larger project conducted with my colleague Megan Lutz of Georgia Tech, who offered important suggestions and assistance with statistical analysis. A version of this paper was presented at the American Sociological Association’s 2014 annual conference.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corey Lee Wrenn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wrenn, C.L. An Analysis of Diversity in Nonhuman Animal Rights Media. J Agric Environ Ethics 29, 143–165 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9593-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gender
  • Race
  • Social movements
  • Media
  • Animal rights