Advertisement

An Analysis of Diversity in Nonhuman Animal Rights Media

  • Corey Lee Wrenn
Articles

Abstract

Lack of diversity in the ranks as well as a failure to resonate with disadvantaged groups and other anti-oppression movements has been cited as one important barrier to the American Nonhuman Animal rights movement’s success (Kymlicka and Donaldson in Animal rights, multiculturalism and the Left. The Mellon Sawyer Seminar at the Graduate Center, CUNY. City University of New York, New York, 2013). It is possible that social movements are actively inhibiting diversity in the ranks and audience by producing literature that reflects a narrow activist identity. This article creates a platform from which these larger issues can be explored by investigating the actual demographic representations present in a small sample of popular media sources produced by the movement for other animals. A content analysis of 131 magazine covers produced by two highly visible movement actors, PETA and VegNews, was conducted to demonstrate that activist representations in at least some dominant American Nonhuman Animal rights media are mostly white, female, and thin.

Keywords

Gender Race Social movements Media Animal rights 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is part of a larger project conducted with my colleague Megan Lutz of Georgia Tech, who offered important suggestions and assistance with statistical analysis. A version of this paper was presented at the American Sociological Association’s 2014 annual conference.

References

  1. Adams, C. (2004). The pornography of meat. London: The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, C., & Donovan, J. (1995). Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explorations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amenta, E., Caren, N., Olasky, S., & Stobaugh, J. (2009). All the movements fit to print: Who, what, when, where, and why SMO families appeared in the New York Times in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 74, 636–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews, K., & Biggs, M. (2006). The dynamics of protest diffusion: Movement organizations, social networks, and news media in the 1960 sit-ins. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 752–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aubrey, J., Stevens, J., Henson, K., Hopper, M., & Smith, S. (2009). A picture is worth twenty words (about the self): Testing the priming influence of visual sexual objectification on women’s self-objectification. Communication Research Reports, 26, 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, C. (2005). Images of women’s sexuality in advertisements: A content analysis of Black- and white-oriented women’s and men’s magazines. Sex Roles, 52(1/2), 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barcelos, C. (2011). Exclusion and American yoga. Sociological Images. http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2011/09/14/exclusion-and-american-yoga/. Accessed 6 November 2015.
  8. Beers, D. (2006). For the prevention of cruelty: The history and legacy of animal rights activism in the United States. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beggan, J., & Allison, S. (2003). ‘What sort of man reads Playboy?’ the self-reported influence of Playboy on the construction of masculinity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 11(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bettinger, E., & Long, B. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. The American Economic Review, 95(2), 152–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bierria, A. (2007). Pursuing a radical anti-violence agenda inside/outside a non-profit structure. In INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence (Ed.), The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex (pp. 151–164). Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bongiorno, R., Bain, P., & Haslam, N. (2013). When sex doesn’t sell: Using sexualized images of women reduces support for ethical campaigns. PLoS ONE, 8(12), e83311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Business Wire. (2012). Love bites: TODAY.com and Match.com survey reveals singles attitudes on dining and dating. Los Angeles, CA: Business Wire.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, M., & Morgan, K. (2011). Veganphobia: Derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK national newspapers. The British Journal of Sociology, 62(1), 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, P. (2004). Black sexual politics: African Americans, gender, and the new racism. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coltrane, S., & Messineo, M. (2000). The perpetuation of subtle prejudice: Race and gender imagery in 1990s television advertising. Sex roles, 42(5/6), 363–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cortese, A. (2008). Provocateur: Images of women and minorities in advertising. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deckha, M. (2008). Disturbing images: PETA and the feminist ethics of animal advocacy. Ethics and the Environment, 13(2), 35–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deckha, M. (2013). Welfarist and imperial: The contributions of anticruelty laws to civilizational discourse. American Quarterly, 65(3), 515–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doherty, R. (1976). Social-documentary photography in the USA. Garden City, NY: AMPHOTO.Google Scholar
  22. Downing, J. (2001). Radical media: Rebellious communication and social movements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Drew, A. (2010). Being a sistah at PETA. In B. Harper (Ed.), Sistah vegan: Food, identity, health, and society: Black female vegans speak (pp. 61–64). Brooklyn: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  24. Earl, J., & Schussman, A. (2003). The new site of activism: On-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 24, 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Einwohner, R. (1999). Gender, class, and social movement outcomes: Identity and effectiveness in two animal rights campaigns. Gender and Society, 13(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferree, M., & Roth, S. (1998). Gender, class, and the interaction between social movements: A strike of West Berlin day care workers. Gender and Society, 12(6), 626–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Freeman, C. (2009). This little piggy went to press: The American news media’s construction of animals in agriculture. The Communication Review, 12(1), 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaarder, E. (2011). Women and the animal rights movement. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gamson, W. (2004). Bystanders, public opinion, and the media. In D. Snow, S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 242–261). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Gamson, W., Croteau, D., Hoynes, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gamson, W., & Wolfsfeld, G. (1993). Movements and media as interacting systems. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528, 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gitlin, T. (2003). The media in the unmaking of the new Left. In J. Goodwin & J. Jasper (Eds.), The social movements reader: Cases and concepts (pp. 301–311). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Glasser, C. (2011). Tied oppressions: An analysis of how sexist imagery reinforces speciesist sentiment. The Brock Review, 12(1), 51–68.Google Scholar
  34. Glasser, C. (2014). Delivering our message: How advocates impact message reception. Humane Thinking. http://spot.humaneresearch.org/content/dont-shoot-messenger-perceptions-hunters-and-circus-goers. Accessed 6 November 2015.
  35. Glick, M. (2013). Animal instincts: Race, criminality, and the reversal of the ‘human’. American Quarterly, 65(3), 639–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Graham, E. (2014). More than condoms and sandwiches: A feminist investigation on the contradictory promises of harm reduction approaches to prostitution. Dissertation. Vancouver, CA: The University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  37. Groesz, L., Levine, M., & Murnen, S. (2002). The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Groves, J. (2001). Animal rights and the politics of emotion: Folk constructions of emotion in the animal rights movement. In J. Goodwin, J. Jasper, & J. Poletta (Eds.), Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements (pp. 212–232). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gutbrod, H. (2013). Who views vegetarians and vegans positively? New poll results. Humane Thinking. Olympia, WA: Humane Research Council.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, L. (2006). Capers in the churchyard: Animal rights advocacy in the age of terror. Darien, CT: Nectar Bat Press.Google Scholar
  41. Harper, B. (2010). Sistah vegan: Food, identity, health, and society: Black female vegans speak. Brooklyn: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  42. Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? the sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 256–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heather. (2011). Vegans. I need to talk to you. Fat girl posing. http://fatgirlposing.blogspot.com/2011/05/vegans-i-need-to-talk-to-you.html. Accessed 6 November 2015.
  44. Held, G. (2005). Magazine covers – a multimodal pretext-genre. Folia Linguistica, 39(1–2), 173–196.Google Scholar
  45. Holmstrom, A. (2004). The effects of the media on body image: A meta-analysis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48, 196–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holtzman, L. (2000). Media messages: What film, television, and popular music teach us about race, class, gender, and sexual orientation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar
  47. hooks, b. (1994). Outlaw culture: Resisting representations. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Jasper, J. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jasper, J., & Poulsen, J. (1993). Fighting back: Vulnerabilities, blunders, and countermobilization by the targets in three animal rights campaigns. Sociological Forum, 8(4), 639–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jasper, J., & Poulsen, J. (1995). Recruiting strangers and friends: Moral shocks and social networks in animal rights and anti-nuclear protests. Social Problems, 42(4), 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Johnson, K. (1990). Impressions of personality based on body forms: An application of Hillestad’s model of appearance. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8(4), 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kalof, L. (1999). The effects of gender and music video imagery on sexual attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 378–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Key, T., & Davey, G. (1996). Prevalence of obesity is low in people who do not eat meat. British Medical Journal, 313(7060), 816–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kocięda, A. (2015). #BlackVegansRock: 100 Black vegans to check out. Striving with Systems: Intersectional Perspectives on Total Liberation. http://strivingwithsystems.com/2015/06/11/blackvegansrock-100-black-vegans-to-check-out/. Accessed 6 November 2015.
  55. Kymlicka, W., & Donaldson, S. (2013). Animal rights, multiculturalism and the Left. New York, NY: The Mellon Sawyer Seminar at the Graduate Center, CUNY, City University of New York.Google Scholar
  56. Lockwood, P. (2006). ‘Someone like me can be successful’: Do college students need same-gender role models? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30(1), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Luke, B. (2007). Brutal: Manhood and the exploitation of animals. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lundblad, M. (2013). The birth of a jungle: Animality in progressive-era U.S. literature and culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. MacKay, N., & Covell, K. (1997). The impact of women in advertisements on attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 36, 573–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Malamuth, N., & Check, J. (1981). The effects of mass media exposure on acceptance of violence against women: A field experiment. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Malkin, A., Wornian, K., & Chrisler, J. (1999). Women and weight: Gendered messages on magazine covers. Sex Roles, 40(718), 647–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Marx, D., Ko, S., & Friedman, R. (2009). The ‘Obama effect’: How a salient role model reduces race-based performance differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 953–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mastro, D., & Greenberg, B. (2000). The portrayal of racial minorities on prime time television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44(4), 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mastro, D., & Stern, S. (2003). Representations of race in television commercials: A content analysis of prime-time advertising. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47(4), 638–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Maurer, D. (2002). Vegetarianism: Movement or moment?. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  66. McCarthy, J., McPhail, C., & Smith, J. (1996). Images of protest: Dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 478–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McLaren, L. (2007). Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29(1), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Monk-Turner, E., Heiserman, M., Johnson, C., Cotton, V., & Jackson, M. (2010). The portrayal of racial minorities on prime time television: A replication of the Mastro and Greenberg study a decade later. Studies in Popular Culture, 32(2), 101–114.Google Scholar
  69. Morry, M., & Staska, S. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(4), 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mundorf, N., D’Alessio, D., Allen, M., & Emmers-Sommer, T. (2007). Effects of sexually explicit media. In R. Preiss, B. Gayle, N. Burrell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 181–198). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  71. National Association for Multi-Ethnicity in Communications. (2013). NAMIC and WICT cable telecommunications industry workforce diversity survey. http://namic.com/research/img/FinalExecutivesummary.pdf. Accessed 6 November 2015.
  72. Newby, P., Tucker, K., & Wolk, A. (2005). Risk of overweight and obesity among semivegetarian, lactovegetarian, and vegan women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 81(6), 1267–1274.Google Scholar
  73. Oliver, P., & Maney, G. (2000). Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: From selection bias to triadic interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 463–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Paoletti, J. (2012). Pink and blue: Telling the boys from the girls in America. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Park, E. (2014). Yoga and diversity. Film. Toronto, CA: Global Mind Body.Google Scholar
  76. Phelps, N. (2007). The longest struggle: Animal advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA. New York, NY: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  77. Povey, R., Wellens, B., & Conner, M. (2001). Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian, and vegan diets: An examination of the role of ambivalence. Appetite, 37(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Puhl, R., Andreyeva, T., & Brownell, K. (2008). Perceptions of weight discrimination: Prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. International Journal of Obesity, 32, 992–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Puhl, R., & Heuer, C. (2010). Obesity stigma: Important considerations for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 100(6), 1019–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Regan, T. (1996). The future of animal rights. Lecture. The University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. http://www.animalsvoice.com/regan/?p=588. Accessed 6 November 2015.
  81. Regan, T. (2004). Empty cages: Facing the challenge of animal rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  82. Roscigno, V., & Danaher, W. (2001). Media and mobilization: The case of radio and southern textile worker insurgency, 1929 to 1934. American Sociological Review, 66(1), 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sampedro, V. (1997). The media politics of social protest. Mobilization, 2(2), 185–205.Google Scholar
  84. Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.Google Scholar
  85. Socha, K., & Blum, S. (Eds.). (2013). Confronting animal exploitation: Grassroots essays on liberation and veganism. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company Inc.Google Scholar
  86. Sorenson, J. (2011). The myth of ‘animal rights terrorism’. The Brock Review, 12(1), 69–99.Google Scholar
  87. Spiker, T. (2003). Cover coverage: How US magazine covers captured the emotions of the September 11 attacks—and how editors and art directors decided on those themes. Journal of Magazine and New Media Research, 5(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
  88. Steele, C., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. The Humane League. (2014). Diet change and demographic characteristics of vegans, vegetarians, semi-vegetarians, and omnivores. Philadelphia, PA: The Humane League.Google Scholar
  90. Torres, B. (2006). Making a killing: The political economy of animal rights. Oakland, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
  91. Turner, S., Hamilton, H., Jacobs, M., Angood, L., & Dwyer, D. (1997). The influence of fashion magazines on the body image satisfaction of college women: An exploratory analysis. Adolescence, 32, 603–614.Google Scholar
  92. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). People QuickFacts. USA. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html. Accessed 6 November 2015.
  93. Wilson, D. (2009). Racial prejudice and the performing animals controversy in early twentieth-century Britain. Society and Animals, 17, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wilson, C, I. I., & Gutiérrez, F. (1995). Race, multiculturalism, and the media: From mass to class communication. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  95. Wrenn, C. L. (2012). Applying social movement theory to nonhuman rights mobilization. Peace Studies Journal, 5(3), 27–44. Google Scholar
  96. Wrenn, C. L. (2015). The role of professionalization regarding female exploitation in the nonhuman animal rights movement. Journal of Gender Studies, 24(2), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wrenn, C. L. (2016a). Professionalization, factionalism, and social movement success: A case study on nonhuman animal rights mobilization. Sociology. Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University. Doctor of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  98. Wrenn, C. L. (2016b). A rational approach to animal rights: Extensions in abolitionist theory. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  99. Zagorsky, J. (2004). Is obesity as dangerous to your wealth as to your health? Research on Aging, 26(1), 130–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Monmouth UniversityWest Long BranchUSA

Personalised recommendations