Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical Issues Concerning the Public Viewing of Media Broadcasts of Animal Cruelty

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Television news does not lie quietly on the coffee table, passively under our control, as are newspapers; rather, it is a medium that provokes reaction and emotion (Shook, 1989 p. 271).

Abstract

Undercover filming is a method commonly used by animal activist groups to expose animal cruelty and it is important to consider the effects of publically releasing video footage of cruel practices on the viewers’ mental health. Previously, we reported that members of the Australian public were emotionally distressed soon after viewing media broadcasts of cruelty to Australian cattle exported for slaughter in Indonesia in 2011. To explore if there were any long term impacts from exposure to media on this issue, a self-selecting group of 15 people who were exposed to a documentary exposé of the cruelty were re-interviewed 12 months later. Nearly all recalled their strong initial reaction to the footage. Approximately one half of the respondents who initially had had a strong emotional reaction to the footage reported negative reactions that were still strong even after this period of time. They reported potential triggers for these feelings. Of the rest, some managed to internalise their feelings. Approximately one half of respondents were unaware of continued live export exposés, suggesting less prominent media coverage. Despite the aversion and repulsion reported after viewing the initial coverage, most respondents said they would choose to watch another broadcast of animal cruelty and nearly all supported undercover investigations as a means of revealing cruelty to animals. We conclude that many people viewing footage of cruelty to animals will have long term memory of this, but that they would prefer to be informed about the issues and not be protected from them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the members of the public who participated in the current study.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Tiplady.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tiplady, C.M., Walsh, D.B. & Phillips, C.J.C. Ethical Issues Concerning the Public Viewing of Media Broadcasts of Animal Cruelty. J Agric Environ Ethics 28, 635–645 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9547-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9547-x

Keywords

Navigation