Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 895–907 | Cite as

De Gustibus Disputandum: The Aesthetics and Ethics of Taste in the Rhetorical Genre of the Restaurant Review



Contemporary professional restaurant reviews have consequences beyond the dinner plate. They now face challenges from the democratizing efforts of blogs and crowd-sourced reviews. Thus an analysis seems appropriate for determining how they are written and what might be lost should they be replaced. Restaurant reviews are presumed to be a species of art and literary criticism and as such have evolved as a rhetorical genre. Through genre analysis we inductively construct the form of the professional restaurant review and then apply it deductively to recent reviews to discover any substantive and stylistic differences that have arisen in the evolution of this genre of writing. We conclude with a critique of this genre that reveals ethical implications for the uses of metaphors in professional restaurant reviews.


Food reviews Ethics Metaphor Genre Rhetoric Aesthetics 


  1. Barthes, R. (1977). Toward a psychosociology of contemporary food consumption. In C. Counihan & P. Van Esterik (Eds.), Food and culture: A reader (pp. 20–26). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Brillat-Savarin, J. A. (1854). The physiology of taste (Fayette Robinson, trans.). Lindsay and Blakiston: Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  3. Brisbane, A. S. (2012). The public editor: The view from the critic’s seat, the New York Times, 14 July 2012. 6 April 2013.
  4. Bruni, F. (2007). No longer young, but still turning heads. The New York Times, 4 April 2007. 6 April 2013.
  5. Bruni, F. (2012). Contentment’s elusive recipe the New York Times, April 9, 2012. 6 April 2013.
  6. Burke, K. (1973). Semantic and poetic meaning. In: Joseph R. Gusfield (ed.), (1989). On symbols and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 86–106.Google Scholar
  7. Burros, M. (1984). Restaurants: 3 of Boston’s Best. The New York Times, 4 April 1984, p. C1.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, K. K., & Jamieson, K. H. (1990). Introduction to form and genre. In Bernard L. Brock, et al. (Eds.), Methods of rhetorical criticism: A twentieth-century perspective (3rd ed.). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Claiborne, C. (1957). Food: New cafe opens; Cafe Argenteuil offers plats du jour at luncheon and a la carte dinners, New York Times, 15 Oct 1957, p. 36.Google Scholar
  10. Claiborne, C. (1961). Restaurant on review: Lutèce both elegant and expensive. New York Times, 28 Mar 1961; p. 38.Google Scholar
  11. Claiborne, C. (1963). Two French restaurants on review. New York Times, 5 Apr 1963, p. 55.Google Scholar
  12. Claiborne, C. (1975). A superlative restaurant, with an extra touch of class. In Paris? No, brussels. The New York Times, 6(1975), 34.Google Scholar
  13. Claiborne, C. (1976). De Gustibus: The problem of finding a good place to dine in Paris on a Sunday in the fall. New York Times, 18 Oct 1976, p. 50.Google Scholar
  14. Claiborne, C. (1983). In Dallas, three superb restaurants. The New York Times, 14 Dec 1983, Section C, p. 1.Google Scholar
  15. Douglass, David. (2000). Issues in the use of I. A. Richards’ tenor-vehicle model of metaphor. Western Journal of Communication, 64(4), 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frye, Joshua, & Bruner, Michael (Eds.). (2012). The rhetoric of food: Discourse, materiality, and power. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Gigante, D. (2005). Taste: A literary history. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gopnik, A. (2011). The table comes first: Family, France, and the meaning of food. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  19. Grimes, W. (1999a). Restaurants: At the new Daniel, invention meets restraint. The New York Times, 2 June 1999. 6 April 2013.
  20. Grimes, W. (1999b). Restaurants; coach house: Attempting a sequel. The New York Times, 19 May 1999. 6 April 2013.
  21. Grimes, W. (2000). Restaurants: Bouley, in his Klimt period. The New York Times, 9 Feb 2000. 6 April 2013.
  22. Hume, D. (1757). Of the standard of taste. 6 April 2013.
  23. Jacobsen, E. (2004). The rhetoric of food: Food as nature, commodity and culture. In M. E. Lien & B. Nerlich (Eds.), The politics of food (pp. 59–78). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  24. Jamieson, K. (1975). Antecedent genre as rhetorical constraint. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 406–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keen, Andrew. (2007). The cult of the amateur. New York: Currency.Google Scholar
  26. Keuhn, G. (2005). How can food be art? In A. Light & J. M. Smith (Eds.), The aesthetics of everyday life (pp. 194–212). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, Mark. (1980). Metaphors we live. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Littlejohn, Sara Jane. (2008). The rhetoric of food narratives: Ideology and influence in American culture. Greensborough: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lucas, S. E. (1986). Genre criticism and historical context: The case of george Washington’s first inaugural address. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 51, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Margolis, Joseph. (1965). The language of art and art criticism. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, B. (1985). Restaurant. The New York Times, 22 Nov 1985. 6 April 2013.
  33. Miller, B. (1986). Restaurants. The New York Times, 8 Aug 1986. 6 April 2013.
  34. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  35. Scruton, R. (2011). Beauty: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Sheraton, M. (1976a). Food that’s not only for the famous. New York Times, 31 Dec 1976 p. 49.Google Scholar
  37. Sheraton, M. (1976b). Restaurant reviews: Some new eating places in little Italy. New York Times. 26 Mar 1976, p. 27.Google Scholar
  38. Sheraton, M. (1976c). Dracula’s feast is the place to try for a rollicking Rumanian evening. The New York Times. 19 March 1976, p. 27.Google Scholar
  39. Sheraton, M. (1980). Restaurants: Three best French restaurants in town. The New York Times. 30 June 1980. Section C, p. 22.Google Scholar
  40. Sifton, S. (2009). La Grenouille. The New York Times, 22 Dec 2009. 6 April 2013.
  41. Sifton, S. (2011). Colonie, The New York Times, 3 May 2011. 6 April 2013.
  42. Sokolov, R. A. (1971a). Restaurant boasts ‘natural’ foods in a serene setting. The New York Times, 1 Oct 1971, p. 46.Google Scholar
  43. Sokolov, R. A. (1971b). Two restaurants where cuisine is haute. The New York Times, 30 July 1971, p. 14.Google Scholar
  44. Sokolov, R. A. (1972a). The restaurant’s expensive, but lacks a soul. The New York Times, 29 Sept 1972, p. 48.Google Scholar
  45. Sokolov, R. A. (1972c). Fine fare at small new restaurant. The New York Times, 4 Feb 1972, p. 12.Google Scholar
  46. Thompson, J. R. (2012). Food talk: Bridging power in a globalizing world. In K. A. Frye & D. M. Bruner (Eds.), The rhetoric of food: Discourse, materiality, and power. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Weele, C. (2006). Food metaphors and ethics: Towards more attention for bodily experience. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 313–324.Google Scholar
  48. Wells, P. (2012a). Critic’s notebook: When he dined, the stars came out. The New York Times, 8 May 2012. 6 April 2013.
  49. Wells, P. (2012b). A reunion of flavors from Spain. The New York Times, 21 Aug 2012. 6 April 2013.
  50. Wertz, S. K. (2006). Toward a philosophy of food history. Philosophy Today, 50(2), 239–248.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Culture and CommunicationDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.College of Arts and SciencesDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Hospitality Management, Culinary Arts, and Food ScienceDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations