Assisted Migration, Risks and Scientific Uncertainty, and Ethics: A Comment on Albrecht et al.’s Review Paper
In response to Albrecht et al.’s (J Agric Environ Ethics 26(4):827–845, 2013) discussion on the ethics of assisted migration, we emphasize the issues of risk and scientific uncertainty as an inextricable part of a comprehensive ethical evaluation. Insisting on a separation of risk and ethical considerations, although arguably common in many policy contexts, is at best misguided and at worst damaging.
KeywordsAssisted migration Ethics Risk Scientific uncertainty Precautionary principle
- Camacho, A. E. (2010). Assisted migration: Redefining nature and natural resource law under climate change. Yale Journal on Regulation, 27(2), 171–255.Google Scholar
- Cranor, C. F. (1997). The normative nature of risk assessments: Features and possibilities. 8 Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 123–136.Google Scholar
- European Environment Agency (EEA) (2001). Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896–2000. http://reports.eea.eu.int/environmental_issue_report_2001_22/en/Issue_Report_No_22.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2013.
- Hansson, S. O. (2007). Risk and ethics: Three approaches. In T. Lewens (Ed.), Risk: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 21–35). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hällfors, M. H., Vaara, E. M., Hyvärinen, M., Oksanen, M., Schulman, L. E., Siipi, H., & Lehvävirta, S. Coming to terms with the concept of moving species threatened by climate change: A systematic review of terminology and definitions. Submitted manuscript.Google Scholar
- International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) (2012). Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations.Google Scholar
- Lemons, J. (Ed.). (1996). Scientific uncertainty and environmental problem solving. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Maschinski, J., Albrecht, M. A., Monks, L., & Haskins, K. E. (2012). Appendix 1: Center for plant conservation best reintroduction practice guidelines. In J. Maschinski & E. Haskins (Eds.), Plant reintroduction in a changing climate: Promises and perils (pp. 277–306). Washington DC: IslandPress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mayo, D. G. (1991). Sociological versus metascientific views of risk assessment. In D. G. Mayo & R. D. Hollander (Eds.), Acceptable evidence: Science and values in risk management (pp. 249–279). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sáenz-Romero, C., Beaulieu, J., & Rehfeldt, G. E. (2011). Altitudinal genetic variation among Pinus patula populations from Oaxaca, México, in growth chambers simulating global warming temperatures. Agrociencia, 45, 399–411.Google Scholar
- Wiener, J. B. (2007). Precaution. In D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée, & E. Hey (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (pp. 597–612). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar