Harmful but culturally cherished practices often endure in spite of the damages they cause. Meat consumption is increasingly becoming one of such cases and may provide an opportunity from which to observe these phenomena. Growing evidence indicates that current and projected production and consumption patterns are important contributors to significant environmental problems, public health degradation, and animal suffering. Our aim is to contribute to a further understanding of the psychological factors that may hinder or promote personal disposition to change food habits to benefit each of these domains. Drawing from previous evidence, this study explores the proposition that some consumers are motivated to resort to moral disengagement strategies when called upon to consider the impacts of their food habits. Data were collected from six semi-structured focus groups with a sample of 40 participants. Although affirming personal duties towards preserving the environment, promoting public health, and safeguarding animal welfare, participants did not show personal disposition to change their meat consumption habits. Several patterns of response that resonate with the principles of moral disengagement theory (i.e. reconstrual of the harmful conduct; obscuring personal responsibility; disregard for the negative consequences; active avoidance and dissociation) were observed while discussing impacts and the possibility of change. Results seem to support the proposition that the process of moral disengagement may play a role in hindering openness to change food habits for the benefit of the environment, public health, and animals, and point towards the relevance of further exploring this approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aldridge, S. (2011). Meats. In B. W. Lerner & K. L. Lerner (Eds.), Food: In context (pp. 553–555). Farmington Hills, MI: Gale.
Anil, L., Anil, S. S., & Deen, J. (2005). Pain detection and amelioration in animals on the farm: Issues and options. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 8(4), 261.
Appleby, P. N., Davey, G. K., & Key, T. J. (2002). Hypertension and blood pressure among meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians and vegans in EPIC-Oxford. Public Health Nutrition, 5(5), 645–654.
Bandura, A. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 27–46.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–220.
Bandura, A. (2007). Impeding ecological sustainability through selective moral disengagement. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2(1), 8–35.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.
Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Radke, H. R. M. (2012). Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 247–256.
Berkow, S. E., & Barnard, N. D. (2008). Blood pressure regulation and vegetarian diets. Nutrition Reviews, 63(1), 1–8.
Bilewicz, M., Imhoff, R., & Drogosz, M. (2011). The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 201–209.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. London: Sage.
Braithwaite, J., & Braithwaite, V. (1982). Attitudes toward animal suffering: An exploratory study. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems, 3(1), 42–49.
Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., & Bastian, B. (2011). The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite, 57(1), 193–196.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Campbell, T. C., & Campbell, T. M. (2006). The China study: The most comprehensive study of nutrition ever conducted and the startling implications for diet, weight loss and long-term health. Dallas: BenBella Books.
Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.
Craig, W. J., & Mangels, A. R. (2009). Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(7), 1266–1282.
Dagevos, H., & Voordouw, J. (2013). Sustainability and meat consumption: is reduction realistic? Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 9(2), 60–69.
Demeyer, D., Honikel, K., & De Smet, S. (2008). The World Cancer Research Fund report 2007: A challenge for the meat processing industry. Meat Science, 80(4), 953–959.
Duncan, I. J. H. (2006). The changing concept of animal sentience. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 100(1–2), 11–19.
Foer, J. S. (2010). Eating animals. London: Penguin Books.
Fraser, G. E. (1999). Associations between diet and cancer, ischemic heart disease, and all-cause mortality in non-Hispanic white California Seventh-day Adventists. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70(3), 532S–538S.
Fraser, G. E. (2009). Vegetarian diets: What do we know of their effects on common chronic diseases? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(5), 1607S–1612S.
Goodland, R., & Anhang, J. (2009). Livestock and Climate Change—What if the key actors in climate change were pigs, chickens and cows? Worldwatch November/December 2009, 10–19. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.
Guatteo, R., Levionnois, O., Fournier, D., Guémené, D., Latouche, K., Leterrier, C., et al. (2012). Minimising pain in farm animals: the 3S approach—“Suppress, Substitute, Soothe”. Animal, 6(8), 1267–1274.
Herzog, H. A. (2007). Gender differences in human animal interactions: A review. Anthrozoos, 20(1), 7–21.
Hoek, A. C., Luning, P. A., Weijzen, P., Engels, W., Kok, F. J., & De Graaf, C. (2011). Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person- and product-related factors in consumer acceptance. Appetite, 56(3), 662–673.
Holm, L., & Mohl, M. (2000). The role of meat in everyday food culture: an analysis of an interview study in Copenhagen. Appetite, 34(3), 277–283.
Jamieson, J., Reiss, M. J., Allen, D., Asher, L., Parker, M. O., Wathes, C. M., et al. (2013). Adolescents care but don’t feel responsible for farm animal welfare. Society & Animals. doi:10.1163/15685306-12341283
Jaspal, R., & Cinnirella, M. (2010). Coping with potentially incompatible identities: accounts of religious, ethnic, and sexual identities from British Pakistani men who identify as Muslim and gay. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 849–870.
Knight, S., & Barnett, L. (2008). Justifying attitudes toward animal use: A qualitative study of people’s views and beliefs. Anthrozoos: A Multidisciplinary Journal of the Interactions of People & Animals, 21(1), 31–42.
Knight, S., Nunkoosing, K., Vrij, A., & Cherryman, J. (2003). Using grounded theory to examine people’s attitudes toward how animals are used. Society and Animals, 11(4), 307–327.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
Lea, E., & Worsley, A. (2001). Influences on meat consumption in Australia. Appetite, 36(2), 127–136.
Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Bastian, B. (2010). The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite, 55(1), 156–159.
Mitchell, L. (2011). Moral disengagement and support for nonhuman animal farming. Society and Animals, 19(1), 38–58.
Norat, T., Bingham, S., Ferrari, P., Slimani, N., Jenab, M., Mazuir, M., et al. (2005). Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: The European Prospective Investigation into cancer and nutrition. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 97(12), 906–916.
Pelletier, N., & Tyedmers, P. (2010). Forecasting potential global environmental costs of livestock production 2000–2050. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(43), 18371–18374.
Pimentel, D., & Pimentel, M. (2003). Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78(3), 660S–663S.
Prunier, A., Mounier, L., Le Neindre, P., Leterrier, C., Mormède, P., Paulmier, V., & Guatteo, R. (2013). Identifying and monitoring pain in farm animals: a review. Animal, 7(6), 998–1010.
Ruby, M. B. (2012). Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. Appetite, 58(1), 141–150.
Sabaté, J. (2003). The contribution of vegetarian diets to health and disease: A paradigm shift? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78(3), 502S–507S.
Sabaté, J., & Wien, M. (2010). Vegetarian diets and childhood obesity prevention. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 91(5), 1525S–1529S.
Singer, P., & Mason, J. (2006). The way we eat: Why our food choices matter. Emmaus: Rodale.
Stabler, B. J. (2011). Asian diet. In B. W. Lerner & K. L. Lerner (Eds.), Food: In context (pp. 53–56). Farmington Hills, MI: Gale.
Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., Vuuren, D. P., Elzen, M. G. J., Eickhout, B., & Kabat, P. (2009). Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic Change, 95(1–2), 83–102.
Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow—environmental issues and options. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
Steinfeld, H., Mooney, H.A, Neville, L.E., Gerber, P., & Reid, R. (2008). Livestock in a changing landscape—UNESCO-SCOPE-UNEP Policy Briefs Series, Policy Brief No. 6. Paris: UNESCO-SCOPE-UNEP.
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. (2013). FAOSTAT. Retrieved March 08, 2013, from http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=569#ancor.
Verbeke, W., Pérez-Cueto, F. J., Barcellos, M. D., Krystallis, A., & Grunert, K. G. (2010). European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science, 84(2), 284–292.
WHO. (2011a). Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization.
WHO. (2011b). Action plan for implementation of the European Strategy for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2012–2016. Geneva: World Health Organization.
This work was supported by a grant from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT; Reference SFRH/BD/79487/2011), awarded to the first author. The authors express their gratitude to Joana Nunes Patrício for her assistance in data collection.
About this article
Cite this article
Graça, J., Calheiros, M.M. & Oliveira, A. Moral Disengagement in Harmful but Cherished Food Practices? An Exploration into the Case of Meat. J Agric Environ Ethics 27, 749–765 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9488-9
- Public health
- Moral disengagement