Skip to main content
Log in

The Mini-Cup Jelly Court Cases: A Comparative Analysis from a Food Ethics Perspective

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compares and analyzes separate court rulings in three countries on “mini-cup jelly” (a firm jelly containing konjac and packaged in bite-sized plastic cups) from a food ethics perspective. While the Korean and US courts decided that the mini-cup jelly was defective, and that the manufacturers or importers were liable for damages in these cases, the Japanese court took an opposing stance in favor of the manufacturer. However, from an absolute and fundamental viewpoint, the jelly was unacceptable, ethically as well as legally, because it was unsafe, unwholesome, and unfit for children’s consumption. I argue that the ignoring or sidelining of fundamental principles of food ethics, especially “respect for life,” was at the core of these cases. If the manufacturers and importers had considered and prioritized the principles of food ethics over and above big sales and profits, the choking accidents could have been prevented. To conclude, it is very important to minimize risks by applying the principles of food ethics at the outset before any accidents can occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Catholic University of Korea Research Fund, 2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suk Shin Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S.S. The Mini-Cup Jelly Court Cases: A Comparative Analysis from a Food Ethics Perspective. J Agric Environ Ethics 27, 735–748 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9487-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9487-2

Keywords

Navigation