Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 153–171 | Cite as

Public and Consumer Policies for Higher Welfare Food Products: Challenges and Opportunities

Review Paper

Abstract

Farm animal welfare in livestock production is a topical and important issue attracting growing interest of policy makers, consumers, stakeholders in the supply chain and others. While there is much public interest in the issue this is not reflected in the supply and market shares of animal food products that are produced under welfare standards that exceed legislative requirements. Given the obstacles to devising stricter legislative standards, higher welfare animal food products are mostly made available through market-based approaches. This paper discusses different challenges and opportunities for a range of public and consumer policies and makes recommendations on how these might be strengthened. The paper does not report primary empirical findings but assembles available knowledge on citizen and consumer attitudes and perceptions towards animal welfare from various research disciplines. We argue that in order for public and consumer policies to be (more) efficient and effective, it is important to develop a segmented and targeted strategy. This paper will thus elaborate on what information could and should be provided to whom. This implies the need for a good understanding of how people conceptualize farm animal welfare. Further, information provisioning should address the needs and expectations of those specific consumer segments most likely to be motivated to purchase higher welfare products. Based on the assembled information, opportunities and challenges for information provisioning and communication to the public and consumers are identified. The merits and limitations of different forms of information provisioning and animal welfare labelling are discussed and recommendations are set forth for future research.

Keywords

Communication Consumer Farm animal welfare Information Label Policy 

References

  1. Adams, C. J. (1990). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York, US: Continuum International Publishing group.Google Scholar
  2. Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: A review. British Food Journal, 111, 1140–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appleby, M. C. (1999). Definitions of welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 65, 159–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, R. M., & Larson, D. (1996). Contingent valuation of the perceived benefits of farm animal welfare legislation: An exploratory survey. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47, 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, C., & Hammarström, A. (2006). The process of building a new governmental authority based on public demands for improved animal welfare. Livestock Science, 103, 297–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger, I. E., & Corbin, R. M. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy Marketing, 11, 79–89.Google Scholar
  7. Bernués, A., Olaizola, A., & Corcoran, K. (2003). Labelling information demanded by European consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Science, 65, 1095–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binnekamp, M., & Ingenbleek, P. (2006). Market barriers for welfare product innovations. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54, 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blokhuis, H. J., Keeling, L. J., Gavinelli, A., & Serratosa, J. (2008). Animal welfare’s impact on the food chain. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19, S79–S87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boogaard, B. K., Oosting, S. J., & Bock, B. B. (2006). Elements of societal perception of farm animal welfare: A quantitative study in the Netherlands. Livestock Science, 104, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boogaard, B. K., Oosting, S. J., & Bock, B. B. (2008). Defining sustainability as a socio-cultural concept: Citizen panels visiting dairy farms in the Netherlands. Livestock Science, 117, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Botreau, R., Veissier, I., Butterworth, A., Bracke, M. B. M., & Keeling, L. J. (2007). Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 16, 225–228.Google Scholar
  13. Bracke, M. B. M., De Greef, K., & Hopster, H. (2005). Qualitative stakeholder analysis for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 18, 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broom, D. M. (1991). Animal-welfare - concepts and measurement. Journal of Animal Science, 69, 4167–4175.Google Scholar
  15. Buller, H., & Cesar, C. (2007). Eating well, eating fare: Farm animal welfare in France. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15, 45–58.Google Scholar
  16. Caporale, V., Alessandrini, B., Dalla Villa, P., & Del Papa, S. (2005). Global perspectives on animal welfare. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, 24, 567–577.Google Scholar
  17. Carlsson, F., Frykblom, P., & Lagerkvist, C. J. (2007). Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: Mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 34, 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christensen, T., Mørbak, M., Denver, S., & Hasler, B. (2006). Preferences for food safety and animal welfare—A choice experiment study comparing organic and conventional consumers. In Proceedings of the 1st joint European organic congress, Odense, Denmark, 2 pages.Google Scholar
  19. Dagevos, H. (2005). Consumers as four-faced creatures. Looking at food consumption from the perspective of contemporary consumers. Appetite, 45, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dawkins, M. S. (2006). A user’s guide to animal welfare science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R., & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doerfler, R. L., & Peters, K. J. (2006). The relativity of ethical issues in animal agriculture related to different cultures and production conditions. Livestock Science, 103, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duncan, I. J. H. (1996). Animal welfare defined in terms of feelings. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section AAnimal Sciences, 27(Suppl.), 29–35.Google Scholar
  24. Duncan, I. J. H., & Fraser, D. (1997). Understanding animal welfare. In M. Appleby & B. O. Hughes (Eds.), Animal welfare (pp. 19–31). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Eastwood, P. J. (1995). Farm animal welfare, Europe and the meat manufacturer. British Food Journal, 97, 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edwards, J. D., & Schneider, H. P. (2005). The World Veterinary Association and animal welfare. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, 24, 639–646.Google Scholar
  27. Ellen, P. S., Weiner, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy Marketing, 10, 102–117.Google Scholar
  28. Enneking, U. (2004). Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: The case of the Q&S label. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 31, 205–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. European Commission. (2005). Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. Special Eurobarometer 229. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/euro_barometer25_en.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  30. FAWC (Farm Animal Welfare Council). (2006). Report on welfare labelling. http://www.fawc.org.uk/reports/welfarelabel-0606.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  31. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  32. Fisher, M. W. (2009). Defining animal welfare—Does consistency matter? New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 57, 71–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fraser, D. (1995). Science, values and animal welfare: Exploring the ‘inextricable connection’. Animal Welfare, 4, 103–117.Google Scholar
  34. Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 50, S1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gracia, A., & Zeballos, G. (2011). Animal welfare concern and attitudes towards more animal welfare friendly meat products: Characterization and segmentation. Informacion Tecnica Economica Agragria, 107(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
  36. Grunert, K. G., & Valli, C. (2001). Designer-made meat and dairy products: Consumer-led product development. Livestock Production Science, 72, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hamilton, M. (2006). Disgust reactions to meat among ethically and health motivated vegetarians. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 45, 125–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hansman, H. (1999). De consument gevangen in cijfers: Zoektocht naar het bestaan van consumentenbeelden. http://www.lei.dlo.nl/publicaties/PDF/1999/3_xxx/3_99_07.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  39. Harper, G., & Henson, S. (2001). Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice. Final report (EU FAIR CT98-3678). http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/eu_fair_project_en.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  40. Hewson, C. J. (2003). Can we assess welfare? Canadian Veterinary Journal, 44, 749–753.Google Scholar
  41. Hoogland, C. T., de Boer, J., & Boersema, J. J. (2005). Transparency of the meat chain in the light of food culture and history. Appetite, 45, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hoogland, C. T., de Boer, J., & Boersema, J. J. (2007). Food and sustainability: Do consumers-package information mers recognize, understand and value on production standards? Appetite, 49, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hopkins, P. D., & Dacey, A. (2008). Vegetarian meat: Could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21, 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hughes, D. (1995). Animal welfare: The consumer and the food industry. British Food Journal, 97, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. IGD (The Institute of Grocery Distribution). (2007). Consumer attitudes to animal welfare. http://www.igd.com/index.asp?id=1&fid=1&sid=8&tid=33&cid=311. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  46. Ingenbleek, P., Backus, G. B. C., Binnekamp, M. H. A., Bondt, N., Goddijn, S. T., Hoste, R., Immink, V. M., Oosterkamp, E. B., & de Vlieger, J. J. (2006). Dierenwelzijn in transitie; thema’s rond de implementatie van de dierenwelzijnsindex. http://www.verantwoordeveehouderij.nl/producten/Verwaarding/DierenwelzijnInTransitie.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  47. Ingenbleek, P., Binnekamp, M., Van Trijp, J., & de Vlieger, J. (2004). Dierenwelzijn in de markt. Een drieluik van consumenten, retailers en belangenorganisaties in Europa. http://www.lei.dlo.nl/publicaties/PDF/2004/5_xxx/5_04_11.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  48. Ingenbleek, P., & Immink, V. M. (2011). Consumer decision-making for animal-friendly products: Synthesis and implications. Animal Welfare, 20, 11–19.Google Scholar
  49. Jasper, J. M., & Nelkin, D. (1992). The animal rights crusade—The growth of a moral protest. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  50. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory—Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kanis, E., Groen, A. F., & De Greef, K. H. (2003). Societal concerns about pork and pork production and their relationships to the production system. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16, 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kiley-Worthington, M. (1989). Ecological, ethological and ethically sound environments for animals: Towards symbiosis. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 2, 223–247.Google Scholar
  53. Kjaernes, U., Roe, E., & Bock, B. (2007). Societal concerns on farm animal welfare. Powerpoint-presentation on the second stakeholder conference ‘Assuring animal welfare: From societal concerns to implementation’, Welfare Quality®, 3–4 May, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  54. Korthals, M. (2005). Ethics of food production and consumption. http://www.app.wur.nl/NR/rdonlyres/E96C8F3F-A0A4-48C3-956C-355C676B1836/24283/MichielKorthalsEthicsofFoodProductionandConsumptio.doc. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  55. Kubberød, E., Ueland, Ø., Tronstad, Å., & Risvik, E. (2002). Attitudes towards meat and meat-eating among adolescents in Norway: A qualitative study. Appetite, 38, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lagerkvist, C. J., & Hess, S. (2011). A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Laskova, A. (2007). Perceived consumer effectiveness and environmental concerns. In: Proceeding of the 13th Asia Pacific management conference (APMC), 18–20 November, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 206–209.Google Scholar
  58. Lawrence, A.B., & Stott, A.W. (2009). Profiting from animal welfare: An animal-based perspective. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/animalwelfare/lawrence%2009.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  59. Lewis, K. A., Tzilivakis, J., Green, A., Warner, D., & Coles, A. (2008). Farm assurance schemes: Can they improve farming standards? British Food Journal, 110, 1088–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Liljenstolpe, C. (2008). Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: An application to Swedisch pig production. Agribusiness, 24, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lund, V., Coleman, G., Gunnarsson, S., Appleby, M. C., & Karkinen, K. (2006). Animal welfare science—Working at the interface between the natural and social sciences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 97, 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lusk, J. L. (2011). The market for animal welfare. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mayfield, L. E., Bennett, R. M., Tranter, R. B., & Wooldridge, M. J. (2007). Consumption of welfare-friendly food products in Great Britain, Italy and Sweden, and how it may be influenced by consumer attitudes to, and behaviour towards, animal welfare attributes. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15, 59–73.Google Scholar
  64. McCarthy, M., de Boer, M., O’Reilly, S., & Cotter, L. (2003). Factors influencing intention to purchase beef in the Irish market. Meat Science, 65, 1071–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McEachern, M. G., & Schröder, M. J. A. (2002). The role of livestock production ethics in consumer values towards meat. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15, 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McInerney, J. (1991). A socioeconomic perspective on animal-welfare. Outlook on Agriculture, 20, 51–56.Google Scholar
  67. McInerney, J. (2004). Animal welfare, economics and policy. http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/economics/foodfarm/reports/documents/animalwelfare.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  68. Meulenberg, T. (2003). ‘Consument en burger’, betekenis voor de markt van landbouwproducten en voedingsmiddelen. Tijdschrift voor Sociaal Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek van de Landbouw, 18, 43–54.Google Scholar
  69. Meuwissen, M., & Van der Lans, I. (2004). Trade-offs between consumer concerns: An application for pork production. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/24996/1/sp04me01.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  70. Miele, M., Veissier, I., Evans, A., & Botreau, R. (2011). Animal welfare: Establishing a dialogue between science and society. Animal Welfare, 20, 103–117.Google Scholar
  71. Napolitano, F., Girolami, A., & Braghieri, A. (2010). Consumer liking and willingness to pay for high welfare animal-based products. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 21, 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Napolitano, F., Pacelli, C., Girolami, A., & Braghieri, A. (2008). Effect of information about animal welfare on consumer willingness to pay for yoghurt. Journal of Dairy Science, 91, 910–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nelson, K. A. (2004). Consumer decision making and image theory: Understanding value-laden decisions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nilsson, T., Foster, K., & Lusk, J. L. (2006). Marketing opportunities for certified pork chops. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nocella, G., Hubbard, L., & Scarpa, R. (2010). Farm animal welfare, consumer willingness to pay, and trust: Results of a cross-national survey. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 32, 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Olesen, I., Alfnes, F., Røra, M. B., & Kolstad, K. (2010). Eliciting consumers’ willingness to pay for organic and welfare-labelled salmon in a non-hypothetical choice experiment. Livestock Science, 127, 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Phan-Huy, S. A., & Fawaz, R. B. (2003). Swiss market for meat from animal-friendly production - responses of public and private actors in Switzerland. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pouta, E., Heikkila, J., Forsman-Hugg, S., Isoniemi, M., & Makela, J. (2010). Consumer choice of broiler meat: The effects of country of origin and production methods. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rushen, J. (2003). Changing concepts of farm animal welfare: Bridging the gap between applied and basic research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rushen, J., Butterworth, A., & Swanson, J. C. (2011). Farm animal welfare assurance: Science and application. Journal of Animal Science, 89(4), 1219–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Seamer, J. H. (1998). Human stewardship and animal welfare. Applied Animal Behavioural Science, 59, 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Serpell, J. A. (1999). Sheep in wolves’ clothing? Attitudes to animals among farmers and scientists. In F. L. Dolins (Ed.), Attitudes to animals: Views in animal welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Shrum, L. J. (1995). Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for advertising strategy. Journal of Advertising, 24, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sørensen, J. T., & Fraser, D. (2010). On-farm welfare assessment for regulatory purposes: Issues and possible solutions. Livestock Science, 131, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sundrum, A. (2007). Conflicting areas in the ethical debate on animal health and welfare. In W. Zollitsch, C. Winckler, S. Waiblinger, A. Haslberger (Eds.), Sustainable food production and ethics (pp. 257–262) (preprints of the 7th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  86. Te Velde, H. T., Aarts, N., & Van Woerkum, C. (2002). Dealing with ambivalence: Farmers’ and consumers’ perceptions of animal welfare in livestock breeding. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 15, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thompson, P., Harris, C., Holt, D., & Pajor, E. A. (2007). Livestock welfare product claims: The emerging social context. Journal of Animal Science, 85, 2354–2360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Toma, L., Stott, A. W., Revoreda-Giha, C., & Kupiec-Teahan, B. (2012). Consumers and animal welfare: A comparison between European countries. Appetite, 58, 597–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tonsor, G. T., & Olynk, N. J. (2011). Impacts of animal well-being and welfare media on meat demand. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(1), 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tuyttens, F., Heyndrickx, M., De Boeck, M., Moreels, M., Van Nuffel, A., Van Poucke, E., et al. (2008). Broiler chicken health, welfare and fluctuating asymmetry in organic versus conventional production systems. Livestock Science, 113, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ubilava, D., Foster, K. A., Lusk, J. L., & Nilsson, T. (2008). Effects of income and social awareness on consumer WTP for social product attributes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 587–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Van de Velde, L., Verbeke, W., Popp, M., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2010). The importance of the message frame in the case of information provision related to energy and environmental problems. Energy Policy, 38, 5541–5549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Van Wezemael, L., Verbeke, W., Kügler, J. O., de Barcellos, M. D., & Grunert, K. G. (2010). European consumers and beef safety: Perceptions, expectations and uncertainty reduction strategies. Food Control, 21, 835–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vanhonacker, F., Van Poucke, E., Tuyttens, F. A. M., & Verbeke, W. (2010). Citizens’ views on farm animal welfare and related information provision: Exploratory insights from Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23(6), 551–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vanhonacker, F., & Verbeke, W. (2009). Buying higher welfare poultry products? Profiling Flemish consumers who do and do not. Poultry Science, 88, 2702–2711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., Buijs, S., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2009). Societal concern related to stocking density, pen size and group size in farm animal production. Livestock Science, 123, 16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., Pieniak, Z., Nijs, G., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2012). The concept of farm animal welfare: Citizen perceptions and stakeholder opinion in Flanders, Belgium. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2007). Segmentation based on consumers’ perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15, 91–107.Google Scholar
  99. Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2008). Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livestock Science, 116, 126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Veissier, I., Butterworth, A., Bock, B., & Roe, E. (2008). European approaches to ensure good animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 113, 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Verain, M. C. D., Bartels, J., Dagevos, H., Sijtsema, S. J., Onwezen, M. C., & Antonides, G. (2012). Segments of sustainable food consumers: A literature review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Verbeke, W. (2005). Agriculture and the food industry in the information age. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32, 347–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Verbeke, W. (2009). Stakeholder, citizen and consumer interests in farm animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 18, 325–333.Google Scholar
  104. Verbeke, W. (2012). Citizen and consumer attitudes towards animal welfare in livestock production. Presentation at EU Animal Welfare Conference, Brussels, 29 February 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/seminars/docs/290212_d1s2_1_wim_verbeke.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2013.
  105. Verbeke, W., Perez-Cueto, F. J. A., de Barcellos, M. D., Krystallis, A., & Grunert, K. G. (2010). European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science, 84, 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude—Behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64, 542–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Winter, M., Fry, C., & Carruthers, S. P. (1998). European agricultural policy and farm animal welfare. Food Policy, 23, 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Worsley, A., & Lea, E. (2003). Consumers’ personal values and sources of nutrition information. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 42, 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zander, K., & Hamm, U. (2010). Consumer preferences for additional ethical attributes of organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 21, 495–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Bioscience EngineeringGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations