Food Community Networks as Leverage for Social Embeddedness

  • Giuseppina Migliore
  • Giorgio Schifani
  • Giovanni Dara Guccione
  • Luigi Cembalo


Social embeddedness, defined as the interaction of economic activities and social behavior, is used in this study as a conceptual tool to describe the growing phenomenon of food community networks (FCNs). The aim in this paper was to map the system of relations which the FCNs develop both inside and outside the network and, from the number of relations, it was inferred the influence of each FCN upon the formation of new socially embedded economic realities. A particular form of FCN was taken under consideration: solidarity purchase groups (SPGs). Performed with the aid of social network analysis on a sample of SPGs in Sicily (a region in southern Italy), the study allowed us to identify a relational (internal) social embeddedness, in which groups of consumers and farmers are directly influenced by reciprocal interactions, giving rise to more or less numerous links of reciprocity and trust depending on the number of interactions. It was also identified a structural (external) social embeddedness, generated by the nature of relations that the SPGs undertake with the various social actors. From the results of our analysis it emerges that SPGs lie at the intersection of many social realities, influencing them and in turn being influenced by such realities. We highlight the major role played by consumer and environmental associations in affecting the phenomenon of social embeddedness.


Social embeddedness Food community networks Relational structures Local food Sustainable consumption 


  1. Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Network, 27(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  3. Brunori, G., & Rossi, A. (2000). Synergy and coherence through collective action: Some insights from wine routes in Tuscany. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brunori, G., Rossi, A., & Malandrin, V. (2011). Co-producing transition: Innovation processes in farms adhering to solidarity-based purchase groups (SPG) in Tuscany, Italy. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 18(1), 28–53.Google Scholar
  5. Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cembalo, L., Migliore, G., & Schifani, G. (2012). Consumers in postmodern society and alternative food networks: The organic food fairs case in Sicily. New Medit, 11(3), 41–49.Google Scholar
  7. Cembalo, L., Migliore, G., & Schifani, G. (2013). Sustainability and new models of consumption: The Solidarity Purchasing Groups in Sicily. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 26(1), 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cova, B. (1999). From marketing to societing: When the link is more important than the thing. In D. Brownlie, M. Saren, R. Wensley, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Rethinking marketing. Towards critical marketing accountings. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Curtis, F. (2003). Eco-localism and sustainability. Ecological Economics, 46(1), 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). (2003). Local food—a snapshot of the sector. Report of the working group on local food. London: DEFRA.Google Scholar
  11. DeLind, L. B., & Bingen, J. (2008). Place and civic culture: Re-thinking the context for local agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 21(2), 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dempwolf, C. S., & Lyles, L. W. (2012). The uses of social network analysis in planning: A review of the literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 27(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DuPuis, E. M., & Goodman, D. (2005). Should we go « home » to eat?: Toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(3), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliot, R. (1999). Symbolic meaning and postmodern consumer culture. In D. Brownlie, M. Saren, R. Wensley, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Rethinking marketing. Towards critical marketing accountings. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (1999). The centrality of groups and classes. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23(3), 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Faust, K. (1997). Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks, 19(2), 157–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Follet, J. R. (2009). Choosing a food future: Differentiating among alternative food options. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garcia, A., De Magistris, T., & Nayga, R. M. (2012). Importance in social influence in consumers’ willingness to pay for local food: Are there gender differences? Agribusiness, 28(3), 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graziano, P. R., & Forno, F. (2012). Political consumerism and new forms of political participation: The Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale in Italy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. doi: 10.1177/0002716212454839.
  21. Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside,
  22. Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library & Information Science Research, 18(4), 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hendrickson, M., & Heffernan, W. D. (2002). Opening spaces through relocalization: Locating potential resistance in the weaknesses of the global food system. Sociologia Ruralis, 42(4), 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hinrichs, C. C. (2000). Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3), 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hinrichs, C. C. (2003). The practice and politics of food system localization. Journal of Rural studies, 19(1), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hughner, R. S., McDonagh, P., Prothero, A., Schultz, C. J., & Stanton, J. (2007). Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 6(2), 94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IGD (Institute of Grocery Distribution) (2010). Local food gains ground with shoppers. Available from IGD: Accessed 20 July 2012.
  28. Kirwan, J. (2004). Alternative strategies in the UK agro-food system: Interrogating the Alterity of farmers’ markets. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(4), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, R. (2000). Shelter from the storm? Geographies of regard in the worlds of horticultural consumption and production. Geoforum, 31(2), 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lusk, J. L., & Briggeman, B. C. (2009). Food values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(1), 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Micheletti, M., & Stolle, D. (2006). Political consumerism. In L. R. Sherrod, C. A. Flanagan, & R. Kassimir (Eds.), Youth activism: An international encyclopedia. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  33. Miele, M. (1999). Short circuits: New trends in the consumption of food and the changing status of meat. International Planning Studies, 4(3), 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Migliore, G., Cembalo, L., Caracciolo, F., & Schifani, G. (2012). Organic consumption and consumer participation in food community networks. New Medit (Suppl), 11(4), 46–48.Google Scholar
  35. Moragues-Faus, A. M., & Sonnino, R. (2012). Embedding quality in the agro-food system: The dynamics and implications of place-making strategies in the olive oil sector of Alto Palancia, Spain. Sociologia Ruralis, 52(2), 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morgan, K., Marsden, T., & Murdoch, J. (2006). Worlds of food: Place, power, and provenance in the food chain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Murdoch, J., Marsden, T., & Banks, J. (2000). Quality, nature, and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector. Economic Geography, 76(2), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murdoch, J., & Miele, M. (1999). “Back to nature”: Changing worlds of production in the food sector. Sociologia Ruralis, 39(4), 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Norris, P. (1999). Critical citizens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nygård, B., & Storstad, O. (1998). De-globalization of food markets? Consumer perceptions of safe food: The case of Norway. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Offer, A. (1997). Between the gift and the market: The economy of regard. Economic History Review, 50(3), 450–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspective, 14(3), 137–158.Google Scholar
  44. Pascucci, S., Dentoni, D., Lombardi, A., & Cembalo, L., (2011). Food Community Networks. In X. Gellynck, A. Molnàr, & E. Lambrecht (Eds.) Networks and food system performance: how do networks contribute to performance of the food & agricultural system in the face of current challenges of high levels of change & uncertainty? ISBN: 978-90-5989-457-0.Google Scholar
  45. Pascucci, S., Lombardi, A., Cembalo, L., & Dentoni, D. (2013). Governance mechanisms in food community networks. Italian Journal of Food Science, 25(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  46. Renting, H., Marsden, T. K., & Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning, 35(3), 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sage, C. (2003). Social embeddedness and relations of regard: Alternative ‘good food’ networks in south-west Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schifani, G., Inglese, P., Migliore, G., & Noto, F. (2011). The establishment of an organic farmers’ market as a training case study and research for graduate students of organic agriculture in the University of Palermo. International Journal on Food System Dynamics (Suppl), 2(3), 281–291.Google Scholar
  49. Schifani, G., & Migliore, G. (2011). Solidarity purchase groups and the new critical and ethical consumer trends: First result of a direct study in Sicily. New Medit, 11(3), 26–33.Google Scholar
  50. Sonnino, R. (2007). Embeddedness in action: Saffron and the making of the local in southern Tuscany. Agriculture and Human Values, 24(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Streeter, C. L., & Gillispie, D. F. (1993). Social network analysis. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(1–2), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson, R. J. (1996). Introduction to graph theory. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  54. Winter, M. (2003). Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(1), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppina Migliore
    • 1
  • Giorgio Schifani
    • 1
  • Giovanni Dara Guccione
    • 2
  • Luigi Cembalo
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Forest SciencesUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Italian Institute of Agricultural Economics (INEA)PalermoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economics and Policy GroupUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations