Abolition Then and Now: Tactical Comparisons Between the Human Rights Movement and the Modern Nonhuman Animal Rights Movement in the United States

  • Corey Lee Wrenn


This article discusses critical comparisons between the human and nonhuman abolitionist movements in the United States. The modern nonhuman abolitionist movement is, in some ways, an extension of the anti-slavery movement of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and the ongoing human Civil Rights movement. As such, there is considerable overlap between the two movements, specifically in the need to simultaneously address property status and oppressive ideology. Despite intentional appropriation of terminology and numerous similarities in mobilization efforts, there has been disappointingly little academic discussion on this relationship. There are significant contentions regarding mobilization and goal attainment in the human abolitionist movement that speak to modern collective action on behalf of other animals. This article will explore the human abolitionist movement and discuss possible applications of movement organization, tactical repertoires, and goal attainment to the current nonhuman animal rights movement. Specifically, the utility of violence and legislative activism in the antislavery movement are discussed as potentially problematic approaches to abolishing nonhuman animal exploitation. Alternatively, the nonhuman animal rights focus on consumer resistance and nonviolence represent an important divergence in abolitionist mobilization.


Abolition Animal rights Human rights Slavery Social movements 



I extend my gratitude to Randy Sandberg and Matthew Roberts for their support, encouragement, and contributions in the conception and construction of this manuscript and also the anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this paper for their helpful comments.


  1. Adeleke, T. (1998). Afro-Americans and moral suasion: The debate in the 1830’s. The Journal of Negro History, 83(2), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashworth, J. (1995). Slavery, capitalism, and politics in the antebellum republic. Volume 1: Commerce and compromise, 1820–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartolotta, K. (2012). If it contains palm oil, is it vegan? Elephant Journal. Accessed 16 Apr 2012.
  4. Beers, D. (2006). For the prevention of cruelty: The history and legacy of animal rights activism in the United States. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, H. (1958). The American moral reform society, 1836-1841. Journal of Negro Education, 27(1), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benford, R. (1993). Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces, 71(3), 667–701.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, M. (2011). Seeing through raced: A reinterpretation of civil rights photography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blaxter, J. (2009). As seen on TV—or seen off? Towards a vegan media critique. Critical Society Winter, 1, 7–14.Google Scholar
  10. Boyd, B. R. 1987. The new abolitionists: Animal rights and human liberation. Taterhill Press.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, N. (2004). ‘Send back the money!’ Frederick Douglass’s antislavery speeches in Scotland and the emergence of African American internationalism.Scotland’s Transatlantic Relations Project Archive. Accessed 19 April 2012.
  12. Brown, E. (2012). SeaWorld of pain.The Daily Show. Episode #17058, February 15. Comedy Central. Accessed 16 Mar 2012.
  13. Buccola, N. (2012). The political thought of Frederick Douglass: In pursuit of American liberty. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, J. (2007). Slavery on trial: Race, class, and criminal justice in antebellum Richmond, Virginia. Gainsville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  15. Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chilton, P. (1995). Mechanics of change: Social movements, transnational coalitions, and the transformationprocesses in Eastern Europe. In T. Risse-Kappen (Ed.), Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures, international institutions (pp. 189–226). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cole, M., & Morgan, K. (2011). Veganphobia: Derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK national newspapers. The British Journal of Sociology, 62(1), 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cornelius, J. (1991). ‘When I can read my title clear’ literacy, slavery, and religion in the antebellum south. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cowper, W. (1788). Pity for poor Africans. Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade.Google Scholar
  20. Curry, R., & Goodheart, L. (1982). Ambivalence, ambiguity, and contradiction: Garrisonianabolitionists and nonviolence. The Journal of Libertarian Studies, 6(3–4), 217–226.Google Scholar
  21. Davis, A. (2005a). Abolition democracy: Beyond empire, prisons, and torture. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, K. (2005b). The Holocaust and the henmaid’s tale: A case for comparing atrocities. New York: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  23. DeCoux, E. (2009). Speaking for the modern Prometheus: The significance of animal suffering to the abolitionist movement. Animal Law, 16(1), 9–64.Google Scholar
  24. Dickinson, R., & Hollander, S. C. (1991). Consumer votes. Journal of Business Research, 22(4), 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Drescher, S. (2002). The mighty experiment: Free labor versus slavery in British emancipation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Earl, J., & Schussman, A. (2003). The new site of activism: On-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 24, 155–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Evans, P. (1989). Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the third world state. Sociological Forum, 4(4), 561–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferrell, C. (2006). The abolitionist movement. Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  30. Fitzgerald, K. J. (2000). Radical social movement organizations: A theoretical model. Sociological Quarterly, 41(4), 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Francione, G. (1996). Rain without thunder: The ideology of the animal rights movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Francione, G. (2009). Some thoughts on the Abolitionist Approach. The Abolitionist Approach. Accessed 16 Apr 2012.
  33. Francione, G. (2012). Moral concern, moral impulse, and logical argument in animal rights advocacy. The Abolitionist Approach. Accessed 5 Oct 2012.
  34. Francione, G., & Garner, R. (2010). The animal rights debate: Abolition or regulation?. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Freeman, C. P. (2009). This little piggy went to press: The American news media’s construction of animals in agriculture. The Communication Review, 12, 78–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Friedrich, B. (2010). Personal purity vs. effective advocacy.Go Veg. Accessed 24 Feb 2012.
  37. Glickman, L. (2004). ‘Buy for the sake of the slave’: Abolitionism and the origins of American consumer activism. American Quarterly, 56(4), 889–912.Google Scholar
  38. Hall, L. 2006. Capers in the churchyard: Animal rights advocacy in the age of terror. Darien, CT: Nectar Bat Press.Google Scholar
  39. Harper, A. B. (2010). Race as a “feeble matter” in veganism: Interrogating whiteness, geopolitical privilege, and consumption philosophy of “cruelty-free” products. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 8(3), 5–27.Google Scholar
  40. Hribal, J. (2010). Fear of the animal planet: The hidden history of animal resistance. Petrolia: AK.Google Scholar
  41. HSUS. (2011). HSUS, egg industry agree to promote federal standards for hens. Retrieved from
  42. Jacobsson, K. (2013). Channeling and enrollment: The institutional shaping of animal rights activism in Poland. In K. Jacobsson & S. Saxonberg (Eds.), Beyond NGO-ization? The development of social movements in Central, Eastern Europe (pp. 1–35). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  43. Johnson, R. (2012). The biggest development in animal rights for a decade. Practical Animal Ethics. Accessed 12 July 2012.
  44. Joy, M. (2008). Strategic action for animals: A handbook on strategic movement building, organizing, and activism for animal liberation. Brooklyn: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  45. Kew, B. (2003). Appropriating liberation. Society & Animals, 4(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kim, C. J. (2011). Moral extensionism or racist exploitation? The use of holocaust and slavery analogies in the animal liberation movement. New Political Science, 33(3), 311-333.Google Scholar
  47. Lewis, D. L. (1995). W.E.B DuBois: A reader. New york: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  48. Linzey, A. (2009). Why animal suffering matters: Philosophy, theology, and practical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lovitz, D. (2010). Muzzling a movement: The effects of anti-terrorism law, money, and politics on animal activism. Brooklyn: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  50. Maney, G. (2000). Transnational mobilization and civil rights in Northern Ireland. Social Problems, 47(2), 153–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Maurer, D. (2002). Vegetarianism: movement or moment?. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  53. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mercy For Animals. (2012). Your voice is needed to ban cruel tail docking. Accessed 15 Oct 2012.
  55. Micheletti, M., & Follesdal, A. (2007). Shopping for human rights. An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Midgley, C. (1996). Slave sugar boycotts, female activism and the domestic base of British antislaveryculture. Slavery & Abolition, 17(3), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moss, H. (2009). Schooling citizens: The struggle for African American education in antebellum America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. NashvilleVeg. (2012). Vegan: One definition. Many perspectives. One big picture. Nashville Veg, April 12. Accessed 20 Apr 2012.
  59. Nibert, D. (2002). Animal rights/Human rights: Entanglements of oppression and liberation. Oxford: Rowman& Littlefield.Google Scholar
  60. Norris, J. (2009). Does veganism spread itself? Vegan Outreach[Presentation]. Accessed 26 Feb 2012.
  61. Parker, G. (1999). The role of consumer-citizen in environmental protest in the 1990 s. Space and Polity, 3(1), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2007). Controlled-atmosphere killing vs. electric immobilization: A comparative analysis of poultry-slaughter systems from animal welfare, worker safety, and economic perspectives. Accessed 5 Oct 2012.
  63. Perry, L. (1995). Radical abolitionism: Anarchy and the government of God in antislavery thought. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  64. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  65. Piven, F., & Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  66. Pivin, F. (2008). Can power from below change the world? American Sociological Review, 17, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Potter, W. (2011). Green is the new red: An insider’s account of a social movement under siege. San Francisco: City Lights.Google Scholar
  68. Princen, T. (1995). Ivory, conservation, and environmental transnational coalitions. Pp. 227-256 in Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions, edited by T. Risse-Kappen. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Quarles, B. (1969). Black abolitionists. New York: Da Capo.Google Scholar
  70. Randa, L. (2007). The story of Emily the cow: Bovine bodhisattva. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.Google Scholar
  71. Runkle, N. (2012). Kraft foods bans cruel tail docking following MFA investigation at Idaho’s largest dairy factory farm. The MFA Blog. Accessed 15 Oct 2012.
  72. Salt, H. (1980). Animals’ rights: Considered in relation to social progress. Clarks Summit: Society for Animal Rights.Google Scholar
  73. Savage, W. S. (1928). Abolitionist literature in the mails. 1835-1836. The Journal of Negro History, 13(2), 150–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schwartz, R. (2001). Judaism and vegetarianism. New York: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, J. (1995). Transnational political processes and the human rights movement. Research in social movements, conflicts and change, 18, 185–219.Google Scholar
  76. Spiegel, M. (1996). The dreaded comparison: Human and animal slavery. London: Heretic Books.Google Scholar
  77. The Economist. (2006). Sick with excess of sweetness. The Economist, December 19. Accessed 16 Apr 2012.
  78. Williams, Eric. (1994). Capitalism and slavery. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  79. Wrenn, C. (2011). Resisting the globalization of speciesism: Vegan abolitionism as a site for consumer-based social change. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 9(3), 9–27.Google Scholar
  80. Wrenn, C. (2013). Resonance of moral shocks in abolitionist animal rights advocacy: Overcoming contextual constraints. Society & Animals, 21(4), 379–394.Google Scholar
  81. Wright, J. (1792). No title. General Evening Post, March 6. Accessed 16 Apr 2012.
  82. Zald, M., & Ash, R. (1966). Social movement organizations: Growth, decay and change. Social Forces, 44(3), 327–341.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations