Abstract
This article discusses critical comparisons between the human and nonhuman abolitionist movements in the United States. The modern nonhuman abolitionist movement is, in some ways, an extension of the anti-slavery movement of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries and the ongoing human Civil Rights movement. As such, there is considerable overlap between the two movements, specifically in the need to simultaneously address property status and oppressive ideology. Despite intentional appropriation of terminology and numerous similarities in mobilization efforts, there has been disappointingly little academic discussion on this relationship. There are significant contentions regarding mobilization and goal attainment in the human abolitionist movement that speak to modern collective action on behalf of other animals. This article will explore the human abolitionist movement and discuss possible applications of movement organization, tactical repertoires, and goal attainment to the current nonhuman animal rights movement. Specifically, the utility of violence and legislative activism in the antislavery movement are discussed as potentially problematic approaches to abolishing nonhuman animal exploitation. Alternatively, the nonhuman animal rights focus on consumer resistance and nonviolence represent an important divergence in abolitionist mobilization.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adeleke, T. (1998). Afro-Americans and moral suasion: The debate in the 1830’s. The Journal of Negro History, 83(2), 127–142.
Ashworth, J. (1995). Slavery, capitalism, and politics in the antebellum republic. Volume 1: Commerce and compromise, 1820–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bartolotta, K. (2012). If it contains palm oil, is it vegan? Elephant Journal. http://www.elephantjournal.com/2012/03/if-it-contains-palm-oil-is-it-still-vegan-kate-bartolotta-waylon-lewis/. Accessed 16 Apr 2012.
Beers, D. (2006). For the prevention of cruelty: The history and legacy of animal rights activism in the United States. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Bell, H. (1958). The American moral reform society, 1836-1841. Journal of Negro Education, 27(1), 34–40.
Bendford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–639.
Benford, R. (1993). Frame disputes within the nuclear disarmament movement. Social Forces, 71(3), 667–701.
Berger, M. (2011). Seeing through raced: A reinterpretation of civil rights photography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Blaxter, J. (2009). As seen on TV—or seen off? Towards a vegan media critique. Critical Society Winter, 1, 7–14.
Boyd, B. R. 1987. The new abolitionists: Animal rights and human liberation. Taterhill Press.
Brown, N. (2004). ‘Send back the money!’ Frederick Douglass’s antislavery speeches in Scotland and the emergence of African American internationalism.Scotland’s Transatlantic Relations Project Archive. http://www.iash.ed.ac.uk/star/archive/Papers/Brown_Douglass.in.Scotland.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2012.
Brown, E. (2012). SeaWorld of pain.The Daily Show. Episode #17058, February 15. Comedy Central. http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-February-15-2012/seaworld-of-pain. Accessed 16 Mar 2012.
Buccola, N. (2012). The political thought of Frederick Douglass: In pursuit of American liberty. New York: New York University Press.
Campbell, J. (2007). Slavery on trial: Race, class, and criminal justice in antebellum Richmond, Virginia. Gainsville: University Press of Florida.
Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chilton, P. (1995). Mechanics of change: Social movements, transnational coalitions, and the transformationprocesses in Eastern Europe. In T. Risse-Kappen (Ed.), Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures, international institutions (pp. 189–226). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M., & Morgan, K. (2011). Veganphobia: Derogatory discourses of veganism and the reproduction of speciesism in UK national newspapers. The British Journal of Sociology, 62(1), 134–153.
Cornelius, J. (1991). ‘When I can read my title clear’ literacy, slavery, and religion in the antebellum south. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Cowper, W. (1788). Pity for poor Africans. Society for the Abolition of the Slave Trade.
Curry, R., & Goodheart, L. (1982). Ambivalence, ambiguity, and contradiction: Garrisonianabolitionists and nonviolence. The Journal of Libertarian Studies, 6(3–4), 217–226.
Davis, A. (2005a). Abolition democracy: Beyond empire, prisons, and torture. New York: Seven Stories Press.
Davis, K. (2005b). The Holocaust and the henmaid’s tale: A case for comparing atrocities. New York: Lantern Books.
DeCoux, E. (2009). Speaking for the modern Prometheus: The significance of animal suffering to the abolitionist movement. Animal Law, 16(1), 9–64.
Dickinson, R., & Hollander, S. C. (1991). Consumer votes. Journal of Business Research, 22(4), 335–346.
Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drescher, S. (2002). The mighty experiment: Free labor versus slavery in British emancipation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Earl, J., & Schussman, A. (2003). The new site of activism: On-line organizations, movement entrepreneurs, and the changing location of social movement decision making. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change, 24, 155–187.
Evans, P. (1989). Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the third world state. Sociological Forum, 4(4), 561–587.
Ferrell, C. (2006). The abolitionist movement. Westport: Greenwood.
Fitzgerald, K. J. (2000). Radical social movement organizations: A theoretical model. Sociological Quarterly, 41(4), 573–592.
Francione, G. (1996). Rain without thunder: The ideology of the animal rights movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Francione, G. (2009). Some thoughts on the Abolitionist Approach. The Abolitionist Approach. http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/some-thoughts-on-the-abolitionist-approach. Accessed 16 Apr 2012.
Francione, G. (2012). Moral concern, moral impulse, and logical argument in animal rights advocacy. The Abolitionist Approach. http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/moral-concern-moral-impulse-and-logical-argument-in-animal-rights-advocacy/. Accessed 5 Oct 2012.
Francione, G., & Garner, R. (2010). The animal rights debate: Abolition or regulation?. New York: Columbia University Press.
Freeman, C. P. (2009). This little piggy went to press: The American news media’s construction of animals in agriculture. The Communication Review, 12, 78–103.
Friedrich, B. (2010). Personal purity vs. effective advocacy.Go Veg. http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/media/links/p3136/claims.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2012.
Glickman, L. (2004). ‘Buy for the sake of the slave’: Abolitionism and the origins of American consumer activism. American Quarterly, 56(4), 889–912.
Hall, L. 2006. Capers in the churchyard: Animal rights advocacy in the age of terror. Darien, CT: Nectar Bat Press.
Harper, A. B. (2010). Race as a “feeble matter” in veganism: Interrogating whiteness, geopolitical privilege, and consumption philosophy of “cruelty-free” products. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 8(3), 5–27.
Hribal, J. (2010). Fear of the animal planet: The hidden history of animal resistance. Petrolia: AK.
HSUS. (2011). HSUS, egg industry agree to promote federal standards for hens. Retrieved from http://www.humanesociety.org/news/press_releases/2011/07/egg_agreement.html.
Jacobsson, K. (2013). Channeling and enrollment: The institutional shaping of animal rights activism in Poland. In K. Jacobsson & S. Saxonberg (Eds.), Beyond NGO-ization? The development of social movements in Central, Eastern Europe (pp. 1–35). Farnham: Ashgate.
Johnson, R. (2012). The biggest development in animal rights for a decade. Practical Animal Ethics. http://animalrightsuk.blogspot.com/2012/07/biggest-development-in-animal-rights.html. Accessed 12 July 2012.
Joy, M. (2008). Strategic action for animals: A handbook on strategic movement building, organizing, and activism for animal liberation. Brooklyn: Lantern Books.
Kew, B. (2003). Appropriating liberation. Society & Animals, 4(1), 29–49.
Kim, C. J. (2011). Moral extensionism or racist exploitation? The use of holocaust and slavery analogies in the animal liberation movement. New Political Science, 33(3), 311-333.
Lewis, D. L. (1995). W.E.B DuBois: A reader. New york: Henry Holt.
Linzey, A. (2009). Why animal suffering matters: Philosophy, theology, and practical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lovitz, D. (2010). Muzzling a movement: The effects of anti-terrorism law, money, and politics on animal activism. Brooklyn: Lantern Books.
Maney, G. (2000). Transnational mobilization and civil rights in Northern Ireland. Social Problems, 47(2), 153–179.
Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Maurer, D. (2002). Vegetarianism: movement or moment?. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mercy For Animals. (2012). Your voice is needed to ban cruel tail docking. http://www.mercyforanimals.org/ban_tail_docking_NY.aspx. Accessed 15 Oct 2012.
Micheletti, M., & Follesdal, A. (2007). Shopping for human rights. An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 167–175.
Midgley, C. (1996). Slave sugar boycotts, female activism and the domestic base of British antislaveryculture. Slavery & Abolition, 17(3), 137–162.
Moss, H. (2009). Schooling citizens: The struggle for African American education in antebellum America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
NashvilleVeg. (2012). Vegan: One definition. Many perspectives. One big picture. Nashville Veg, April 12. http://www.nashvilleveg.com/vegan-one-definition/. Accessed 20 Apr 2012.
Nibert, D. (2002). Animal rights/Human rights: Entanglements of oppression and liberation. Oxford: Rowman& Littlefield.
Norris, J. (2009). Does veganism spread itself? Vegan Outreach[Presentation]. http://whyveganoutreach.blogspot.com/2011/12/Friday-video-jack-from-2009.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2012.
Parker, G. (1999). The role of consumer-citizen in environmental protest in the 1990 s. Space and Polity, 3(1), 67–83.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. (2007). Controlled-atmosphere killing vs. electric immobilization: A comparative analysis of poultry-slaughter systems from animal welfare, worker safety, and economic perspectives. http://www.peta.org/CAK/CAK+report.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2012.
Perry, L. (1995). Radical abolitionism: Anarchy and the government of God in antislavery thought. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.
Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature. New York: Viking.
Piven, F., & Cloward, R. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Pantheon Books.
Pivin, F. (2008). Can power from below change the world? American Sociological Review, 17, 1–14.
Potter, W. (2011). Green is the new red: An insider’s account of a social movement under siege. San Francisco: City Lights.
Princen, T. (1995). Ivory, conservation, and environmental transnational coalitions. Pp. 227-256 in Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions, edited by T. Risse-Kappen. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Quarles, B. (1969). Black abolitionists. New York: Da Capo.
Randa, L. (2007). The story of Emily the cow: Bovine bodhisattva. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.
Runkle, N. (2012). Kraft foods bans cruel tail docking following MFA investigation at Idaho’s largest dairy factory farm. The MFA Blog. http://www.mfablog.org/2012/10/kraft-foods-bans-cruel-tail-docking-following-mfa-investigation-at-idahos-largest-dairy-factory-farm.html. Accessed 15 Oct 2012.
Salt, H. (1980). Animals’ rights: Considered in relation to social progress. Clarks Summit: Society for Animal Rights.
Savage, W. S. (1928). Abolitionist literature in the mails. 1835-1836. The Journal of Negro History, 13(2), 150–184.
Schwartz, R. (2001). Judaism and vegetarianism. New York: Lantern Books.
Smith, J. (1995). Transnational political processes and the human rights movement. Research in social movements, conflicts and change, 18, 185–219.
Spiegel, M. (1996). The dreaded comparison: Human and animal slavery. London: Heretic Books.
The Economist. (2006). Sick with excess of sweetness. The Economist, December 19. http://www.economist.com/node/8345592. Accessed 16 Apr 2012.
Williams, Eric. (1994). Capitalism and slavery. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
Wrenn, C. (2011). Resisting the globalization of speciesism: Vegan abolitionism as a site for consumer-based social change. Journal for Critical Animal Studies, 9(3), 9–27.
Wrenn, C. (2013). Resonance of moral shocks in abolitionist animal rights advocacy: Overcoming contextual constraints. Society & Animals, 21(4), 379–394.
Wright, J. (1792). No title. General Evening Post, March 6. http://gallery.nen.gov.uk/gallery1318-abolition.html. Accessed 16 Apr 2012.
Zald, M., & Ash, R. (1966). Social movement organizations: Growth, decay and change. Social Forces, 44(3), 327–341.
Acknowledgments
I extend my gratitude to Randy Sandberg and Matthew Roberts for their support, encouragement, and contributions in the conception and construction of this manuscript and also the anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this paper for their helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wrenn, C.L. Abolition Then and Now: Tactical Comparisons Between the Human Rights Movement and the Modern Nonhuman Animal Rights Movement in the United States. J Agric Environ Ethics 27, 177–200 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9458-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-013-9458-7