Advertisement

The Price of Responsibility: Ethics of Animal Husbandry in a Time of Climate Change

  • M. GjerrisEmail author
  • C. Gamborg
  • H. Röcklinsberg
  • R. Anthony
Articles

Abstract

This paper examines the challenges that climate change raises for animal agriculture and discusses the contributions that may come from a virtue ethics based approach. Two scenarios of the future role of animals in farming are set forth and discussed in terms of their ethical implications. The paper argues that when trying to tackle both climate and animal welfare issues in farming, proposals that call for a reorientation of our ethics and technology must first and foremost consider the values that drive current livestock production. This paper sets forth and discusses the broader societal values implicit in livestock production. We suggest that a virtues approach would improve our thinking and practice regarding animal agriculture, facilitating a move from livestock production to animal husbandry. This change in animal agriculture in a time of climate change would stress virtues such as attentiveness, responsibility, competence, and responsiveness as central elements in any mitigation or adaptation program.

Keywords

Adaptation Animal husbandry Mitigation Organic farming Sustainability Virtue ethics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

  1. Anthony, R. (2009). Farming animals and the capabilities approach: Understanding roles and responsibilities through narrative ethics. Society and Animals, 17(3), 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badgley, C., Moghtader, H., Quintero, E., Zakem, E., Chappell, J. M., Aviles-Vazquez, K., et al. (2006). Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 22(2), 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Badgley, C., & Perfecto, I. (2007). Can organic agriculture feed the world? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 22(2), 80–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, W. (1996). The unsettling of America: Culture and agriculture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, W. (2009). Bringing it to the table: On farming and food. Berkeley, CA: Counter point.Google Scholar
  6. Borenstein, S. (2010). Scientists seek better way to do climate report. Washington times 10.02.2010. Accessed 18 February 2010, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/10/scientists-seek-better-way-do-climate-report/.
  7. Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., Henriksson, M., Davis, J. & Sund, V. (2009). Greenhouse gas emissions from production of meat, milk and eggs in Sweden 1990 and 2005. SIK-Rapport 793. Göteborg: SIK–Institutet för Livsmedel och Bioteknik.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, S., & Araya, H. (2009). The Tigray project: Organic agriculture with smallholder farmers in a mountainous environment. Ecology & Farming, 2008, 28–30.Google Scholar
  9. ERS (Economic Research Service)/USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). (2009). Food expenditure tables. Accessed 23rd February 2010, http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/CPIFoodAndExpenditures/Data/Expenditures_tables/table7.htm.
  10. FAO. (2006). Livestock a major threat to environment. Accessed 23rd February 2010, http://www.fao.org/newsroom/eb/news/2006/1000448/index.html.
  11. FAO. (2008). FAO statistical database. Accessed 23rd February 2010, http://faostat.fao.org.
  12. FAO. (2009). Climate change and food security. Accessed 18 February 2010, http://www.fao.org/climatechange.
  13. Fliessbach, A., & Mäder, P. (2006). Productivity, soil fertility and biodiversity in organic agriculture. Odense, Denmark: Joint Organic Congress.Google Scholar
  14. Foer, J. S. (2009). Eating animals. Little: Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  15. Forsberg, C. W., Philips, J. P., Golovan, S. P., Fan, M. Z., Meidinger, R. G., Ajakaiye, A., et al. (2003). The enviropig physiology, performance, and contribution to nutrient management advances in a regulated environment: The leading edge of change in the pork industry. Journal of Animal Science, 81, E68–E77.Google Scholar
  16. Garvey, J. (2008). The ethics of climate change. Right and wrong in a warming world. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Gjerris, M. (2009). This is not a hammer–on ethics and technology. In F. Bedau & E. Parke (Eds.), Our future with protocells: The social and ethical implications of the creation of living technology. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gjerris, M. (2010). I skyggen af vores moralske forfald. Etisk Råd: Vores mad og det globale klima. Etik til en varmere klode. Denmark: Etisk Råd.Google Scholar
  19. Gjerris, M., Olsson, I. A. S., Lassen, J., & Sandøe, P. (2009). Ethical perspectives on animal biotechnology. In P. Atkinson, P. Glasner, & M. Lock (Eds.), Handbook of genetics and society: Mapping the new genomic era (pp. 382–398). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Goodland, R. & Anhang, J. (2009). Livestock and climate change. WorldWatch Nov/Dec 2009. Worldwatch Institute. Acessed 23rd February 2010, http://www.worldwatch.org/node/6294.
  21. Granstedt, A. & Kjellenberg. (2008). Organic and biodynamic cultivation–a possible way of increasing humus capital, improving soil fertility and providing a significant carbon sink in Nordic conditions. Cultivating the future based on science: 2nd Conference of the International Society of Organic Agriculture Research ISOFAR, Modena, Italy, June 18–20, 2008.Google Scholar
  22. Harrison, R. (1964). Animal machines: The new factory farming industry. London: Stuart.Google Scholar
  23. Heymann, M., Andersen, H. & Sandøe, P. (2009). What is climate science all about–Philosophical perspectives. In: Gjerris, M., Gamborg, C., Olesen, J. E. & Wolf, J. (Eds.) Earth on fire. Climate change from a philosophical and ethical perspective (pp. 69–88). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. Available at www-earthonfire.foi.dk. Accessed 23rd February 2010.Google Scholar
  24. Hunter, C. V., Tiley, L. S. & Sang, H. M. (2005). TRENDS in molecular medicine 11(6), 293–298.Google Scholar
  25. IFOAM. (2009a). Organic agriculture–a guide to climate change & food security. Accessed 10th February 2010, http://www.ifoam.org/growing_organic/1_arguments_for_oa/environmental_benefits/pdfs/ IFO AM-CC-Guide-Web-20100210.pdf.
  26. IFOAM. (2009b). The contribution of organic agriculture to climate change adaptation in Africa. Accessed 10th February 2010, http://www.ifoam.org/growing_organic/1_arguments_for_oa/environmental_benefits/pdfs/IFOAM-CC-Adaptation-Web_20100210.pdf.
  27. IFOAM. (2009c). The contribution of organic agriculture to climate change mitigation. Accessed 10 February 2010, http://www.ifoam.org/growing_organic/1_arguments_for_oa/environmental_benefits/pdfs/IFOAM-CC-Mitigation-Web.pdf.
  28. IFOAM. (2010). The principles of organic agriculture. Accessed 28 May 2010, http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/principles/index.html.
  29. Ilea, R. C. (2009). Intensive livestock farming: Global trends, increased environmental concerns, and ethical solutions. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22(2), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karlsson, F. (2009). A critical assessment of justification and prioritzations in animal-rights theories. Uppsala Studies in Social Ethics 38, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
  31. Lund, V., Anthony, R., & Röcklinsberg, H. (2004). The ethical contract as a tool in organic animal husbandry. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 17(1), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lund, V., Mejdell, C., Röcklinsberg, H., Anthony, R., & Håstein, T. (2007). Expanding the moral circle: Farmed fish as objects of moral concern. Disease of Aquatic Organisms, 75, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lund, V., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2006). Animal agriculture: Symbiosis, culture, or ethical conflict? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lund, V., & Röcklinsberg, H. (2001). Outlining a conception of animal welfare for organic farming systems. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14(4), 391–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, G. & Lund, A. B. (2009). The climate debate′s debating climate. In: Gjerris, M., Gamborg, C., Olesen, J. E. & Wolf, J. (Eds.) Earth on fire. Climate change from a philosophical and ethical perspective. (pp. 135–162). Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. Available at www.earthonfire.foi.dk. Accessed 28 May 2010.
  36. Newton, L. (2002). Ethics and sustainability: Sustainable development and the moral life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Niemann, H., Kues, W., & Carnwath, J. W. (2005). Transgenic farm animals: Present and future. Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics), 24(1), 285–298.Google Scholar
  38. Niggli, U., Earley, J. & Ogorzalek, K. (2007). Organic agriculture and the environmental stability of food supply. International Conference on Organic Agriculture and Food Security, Rome, Italy, May 3–5, 2007. Accessed 28 May 2010, ftp://ftp.fao.org/paia/organicag/ofs/OFS-2007-3.pdf.
  39. Nussbaum, M. C. (2007). Frontiers of justice. Disability, nationality, species membership. Belknap, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Padel, S., Röcklinsberg, H., Verhoog, H., Alrøe, H. F., de Wit, J., Kjeldsen, C., et al. (2007). Balancing and integrating basic values in the development of organic regultions and standards: Proposal for a procedure using case studies of conflicting areas. EEC2092/91 (Organic) Revision (SSPE-CT-2004–502397): Project report D 2.3. Aberystwyth: University of Wales, Aberystwyth (UWA) and Danish Research Centre for Organic Farming (DARCOF). Tjele.Google Scholar
  41. Parfitt, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson, C. E. (2007). Climate change 2007. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Pitesky, M. E., Stackhouse, K. R., & Mitloehner, F. M. (2009). Clearing the air: Livestock’s contribution to climate change. In D. Sparks (Ed.), Advances in agronomy (Vol. 103, pp. 1–40). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Richardson, K., Steffen, W., Schnellnhuber, H. J., Alcamo, J., Barker, T., Kammen, D. M., Leemans, R., Liverman, D., Munasinghe, M., Osman-Elasha, B., Stern, N. & Wæver, O. (2009). Synthesis report from “Climate change: Global risks challenges and decisions”. Copenhagen 2009, 10–12 March. University of Copenhagen & The International Alliance of Research Universities. Accessed 18th February 2010, http://www.climatecongress.ku.dk/pdf/synthesisreport.
  46. Robl, J. M., Wang, Z., Kasinathan, P., & Kuroiwa, Y. (2007). Transgenic animal production and animal biotechnology. Theriogenology, 67, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Röcklinsberg, H. (2009). Animal ethics in a time of climate change. In K. Millar, P. H. West, & B. Nerlich (Eds.), Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons (pp. 92–96). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Pb.Google Scholar
  48. Rollin, B. E. (1995). Farm animal welfare: Social, bioethical, and research issues. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sandler, R. (2007). Character and environment: A virtue-oriented approach to environmental ethics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sandler, R., & Cafaro, P. (Eds.). (2005). Environmental virtue ethics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  51. Sandøe, P., & Christiansen, S. B. (2008). Ethics of animal use. Oxford: Blackwell publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Singer, P. (1991). Animal liberation (2nd ed.). London: Thorsons.Google Scholar
  53. Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Singer, P., & Mason, J. (2006). The ethics of what we eat: Why our food choices matter. New York: Rodale Inc.-Holtzbrinck Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Sonesson, U., Berglund, M., Cederberg, C. (2009). Utsläpp av växthusgaser vid production av kycklingkött. Underlag till klimatcertifiering. Klimatmärkningen, Rapport: 6.Google Scholar
  56. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wasenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M. & de Haan, C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  57. Thompson, P. B. (2001). Reshaping conventional agriculture: A North American perspective. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14(2), 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thompson, P. B. (2008). The ethics of intensification: Agricultural development and cultural change. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thompson, P. B., & Nardone, A. (1999). Sustainable livestock production: Methodological and ethical challenges. Livestock Production Science, 61, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007, the physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. United Nations Population Division. (2009). World population to exceed 9 billion by 2050 (pp. 92–96). United Nations Population Division. Accessed 10 February 2010, http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2008/pressrelease.pdf.
  62. Weil, S. (1977). The Simone Weil reader, edited by Panichas GA. Wakefield, RI: Moyer Bell.Google Scholar
  63. Winther, U., Ziegler, F., Hognes, S. E., Emanuelsson, A., Sund, V., & Ellingsen, H. (2009). Carbon footprint and energy use of Norwegian seafood products. Report no SFH80 A096068. Trondheim: SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture.Google Scholar
  64. Wolf, J., & Gjerris, M. (2009). A religious perspective on climate change. Studia Theologica -Nordic Journal of Theology, 63(2), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Gjerris
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Gamborg
    • 2
  • H. Röcklinsberg
    • 3
  • R. Anthony
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Food and Resource Economics, Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk AssessmentUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of Forest & Landscape, Danish Centre for Bioethics and Risk AssessmentUniversity of CopenhagenFrederiksberg CDenmark
  3. 3.Department of Ethics, Centre for Theology and Religious StudiesLund UniversityScaniaSweden
  4. 4.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Alaska AnchorageAnchorageUSA

Personalised recommendations