The concept of natural behavior is a key element in current Dutch policy-making on animal welfare. It emphasizes that animals need positive experiences, in addition to minimized suffering. This paper interprets the concept of natural behavior in the context of the scientific framework for welfare assessment. Natural behavior may be defined as behavior that animals have a tendency to exhibit under natural conditions, because these behaviors are pleasurable and promote biological functioning. Animal welfare is the quality of life as perceived by the animal. Animals have evolved cognitive-emotional systems (“welfare needs”) to deal with a variable environment. Animals do not only have so-called physiological needs such as the need for food, water, and thermal comfort. They also need to exercise certain natural behaviors such as rooting or nest-building in pigs, and scratching or dust-bathing in poultry. All needs must be taken into account in order to assess overall welfare. The degree of need satisfaction and frustration can be assessed from scientific information about the intensity, duration, and incidence of (welfare) performance criteria such as measurements of behavior and/or (patho)physiology. Positive welfare value relates to how animals are inclined to behave under natural conditions, in preference tests, and in consumer-demand studies. Negative welfare value relates to stress, frustration, abnormal behavior, aggression, and reduced fitness. Examples are given to illustrate how the need to perform natural behaviors can be assessed following the general principles for welfare assessment, providing a first approximation of how different natural behaviors affect animal welfare.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
InstitutionalAuthorNameAnonymous (2001) ArticleTitle“Scientists’ Assessment of the Impact of Housing and Management on Animal Welfare” Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 4 1–52 Occurrence Handle10.1207/S15327604JAWS0401_2
M. B. M. Bracke K. H. Greef Particlede H. Hopster (2005) ArticleTitle“Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis for the Development of Sustainable Monitorring Systems for Farm Animal Welfare” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 IssueID2005 27–56
M. B. M. Bracke B. M. Spruijt J. H. M. Metz (1999a) ArticleTitle“Overall Welfare Assessment Reviewed. Part 1: Is it Possible?” Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 47 279–291
M. B. M. Bracke B. M. Spruijt J. H. M. Metz (1999b) ArticleTitle“Overall Animal Welfare Reviewed Part 3, Welfare Assessment Based on Needs and Supported by Expert Opinion” Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 47 307–322
Bracke, M. B. M. (2001), Modelling of Animal Welfare: The Development of a Decision Support System to Assess the Welfare Status of Pregnant Sows, PhD dissertation, Wageningen.
M. B. M. Bracke B. M. Spruijt J. H. M. Metz W. G. P. Schouten (2002) ArticleTitle“Decision Support System for Overall Welfare Assessment in Pregnant Sows A: Model Structure and Weighting Procedure” Journal of Animal Science 8 1819–1834
R. W. R. Brambell (1965) Report of the Technical Committee to Enquire into the Welfare of Livestock Kept in der Intensive Husbandry Conditions HMSO London
K. Breland M. Breland (1961) ArticleTitle“The Misbehavior of Organisms” American Journal of Psychology 16 681–684
M. S. Dawkins (1990) ArticleTitle“From an Animal’s Point of View: Motivation, Fitness, and Animal Welfare” Behavior and Brain Science 13 1–61
InstitutionalAuthorNameFAWC (Farm Animal Welfare Council) (1992) ArticleTitle“FAWC Updates the Five Freedoms” Veterinary Record 131 357
D. Fraser D. M. Weary E. A. Pajor B. N. Milligan (1997) ArticleTitle“A Scientific Conception of Animal Welfare that Reflects Ethical Concerns” Animal Welfare 6 187–205
D. Fraser I. J. H. Duncan (1998) ArticleTitle“‘Pleasures’, ‘Pains’ and Animal Welfare: Toward a Natural History of Affect” Animal Welfare 7 383–396
H. Hopster R. M. Bruckmaier J. T. N. Werf Particlevan der S. M. Korte J. Macuhova G. Korte-Bouws C. G. Reenen Particlevan (2002) ArticleTitle“Stress Responses During Milking; Comparing Conventional and Automatic Milking in Primiparous Dairy Cows” Journal of Dairy Science 85 3206–3216
B. O. Hughes I. J. H. Duncan (1988) ArticleTitle“The Notion of Ethological ‘Need’, Models of Motivation, and Animal Welfare” Animal Behaviour 36 1696–1707
P. Jensen (1993) ArticleTitle“Nestbuilding in Domestic Sows: The Role of External Stimuli” Animal Behaviour 45 351–358 Occurrence Handle10.1006/anbe.1993.1040
P. Jensen F. M. Toates (1993) ArticleTitle“Who Needs Behavioural Needs – Motational Aspects of the Needs of Animals” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37 161–181
F. H. Jonge ParticleDe G. A. Goewie (2000) In het Belang van het Dier: Over het Welzijn van Dieren in de Veehouderij [In the interest of the Animal: About the Welfare of Animals in Livestock Production] Rathenau Institute The Hague
C. Lindqvist P. Jensen (2003) “Contra Freeloading Decreases with Age and Social Isolation in Red Jungle Fowl and White Leghorn Layers” V. Ferrante (Eds) Proceedings of the 37th International Congress of the ISAE Fondazione Iniziative Zooprofilattiche e Zootecniche Brescia 159
LNV (2002). Beleidsnota Dierenwelzijn, Maart 2002 (Animal Welfare Policy Memorandum, March 2002). The Hague: LNV.
B. S. McEwen (2002) ArticleTitle“Sex, Stress and the Hippocampus: Allostasis, Allostatic Load and the Aging Process” Neurobiology of Aging 23 921–939 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00027-1
L. R. Matthews J. Ladewig (1994) ArticleTitle“Environmental Requirements of Pigs Measured by Behavioural Demand Functions” Animal Behaviour 47 713–719 Occurrence Handle10.1006/anbe.1994.1096
E. Röder R. Bos Particlevan den (2001) Passen en meten? Over soorteigen gedrag en dierenhuisvestingsbeleid bij productiedieren, proefdieren en plezierdieren [Fitting and Measuring About Species-Specific Behaviour and Policy Making on Housing for Livestock, Laboratory Animals and Pets] NWO Ethiek & Beleid The Hague
J. Rushen (1991) ArticleTitle“Problems Associated with the Interpretation of Physiological Data in the Assessment of Animal Welfare” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 28 381–386 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0168-1591(91)90170-3
D. Singh (1970) ArticleTitle“Preference for Bar Pressing to Obtain Reward Over Freeloading in Rats and Children” Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology 73 320–327
B. M. Spruijt R. Bos Particlevan den F. T. A. Pijlman (2001) ArticleTitle“A Concept of Welfare Based on Reward Evaluating Mechanisms in the Brain: Anticipatory Behaviour as an Indicator for the State of Reward Systems” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 72 145–171 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00204-5
A. Stolba D. G. M. Wood-Gush (1989) ArticleTitle“The Behaviour of Pigs in a Semi-natural Environment” Animal Production 48 419–425
F. M. Toates (1995) Stress: Conceptual and Biological Aspects Wiley Chichester
J. Webster (1995) Animal Welfare: A Cool Eye Towards Eden Blackwell Oxford
P. R. Wiepkema (1987) “Behavioural Aspects of Stress” P. R. Wiepkema P. W. M. Adrichem Particlevan (Eds) Biology of Stress in Farm Animals: An Integrative Approach Martinus Nijhoff Dordrecht 113–133
Wijffels (2001), Toekomst voor de veehouderij. Agenda voor een herontwerp van de sector [Future for Livestock Production. Agenda for a Redesign of the Sector], Report of the Commission Wijffels, The Hague.
Willeberg, P. (1991), “Animal Welfare Studies: Epidemiological Considerations,” Proceedings of the Society for Veterinary Epidemilogy and Preventive Medicine, London, pp. 76–82.
About this article
Cite this article
Bracke, M.B.M., Hopster, H. Assessing the Importance of Natural Behavior for Animal Welfare. J Agric Environ Ethics 19, 77–89 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-4493-7
- Animal welfare
- assessment methodology
- natural behavior