Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Human Diets and Animal Welfare: the Illogic of the Larder

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Few moral arguments have been made against vegetarian diets. One exception is the “Logic of the Larder:” We do animals a favor by purchasing their meat, eggs, and milk, for if we did not purchase these products, fewer animals would exist. This argument fails because many farm animals have lives that are probably not worth living, while others prevent a significant number of wild animals from existing. Even if this were not so, the purchase of animal products uses resources that could otherwise be used to bring a much greater number of animals into existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M. C. Appleby (1999) What Should We do About Animal Welfare? Blackwell Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • M. C. Appleby J. A. Mench B. O. Hughes (2004) Poultry Behaviour and Welfare CABI Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson J. B. and B. E. Rollin (Eds) (2004) The Well-Being of Farm Animals Blackwell Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Blackorby D. Donaldson (1992) ArticleTitle“Pigs and Guinea Pigs: A Note on the Ethics of Animal Exploitation” Economic Journal 102 IssueID415 1345–1369

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Blackorby W. Bossert D. Donaldson (1997) ArticleTitle“Critical-Level Utilitarianism and the Population Ethics Dilemma” Economics and Philosophy 13 197–230

    Google Scholar 

  • T. E. Blackwell (2004) “Production Practices and Well-Being: Swine,,” J. B. Benson B. E. Rollin (Eds) The Well-Being of Farm Animals Blackwell Ames, IA 241–270

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Broome (2004) Weighing Lives Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Cabanac (1999) ArticleTitle“Emotion and Phylogeny” Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 IssueID6 176–190

    Google Scholar 

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameCAST (Council for Agricultural Science and Technology) (1999) Animal Agriculture and Global Food Supply: Animal Production Systems and Resource Use CAST Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. M. A., “The Golden Rule Implies Concern for Species from Individual-Level Duties,” (2004) under review

  • K. P. Chandroo I. J. H. Duncan R. D. Moccia (2004) ArticleTitle“Can Fish Suffer? Perspectives on Sentience, Pain, Fear and Stress” Applied Animal Behaviour Science 86 225–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, T., Market Failure for the Treatment of Animals (George Mason University, March 21, 2005), http://www.gmu.edu/jbc/Tyler/animals.doc.

  • de Haan, C., H. Steinfeld, and H. Blackburn, Livestock and the Environment: Finding a Balance (European Commission Directorate-General for Development, 1997), http://www.fao.org/documents/show_cdr.asp?url_file=/docrep/x5303e/x5303e00.htm

  • I. J. H. Duncan (2004) “Welfare Problems of Poultry” J. B. Benson B. E. Rollin (Eds) The Well-Being of Farm Animals Blackwell Ames, IA 307–324

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Eisnitz (1997) Slaughterhouse Prometheus Books London

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Fearnley-Whittingstall (2004) The River Cottage Meat Book Hodder and Stoughton London

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fraser D. M. Weary (2004) “Quality of Life for Farm Animals” J. B. Benson B. E. Rollin (Eds) The Well-Being of Farm Animals Blackwell Ames, IA 39–60

    Google Scholar 

  • R. G. Frey (1983) Rights, Killing, and Suffering, Ch. 15 Basil Blackwell Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • F. B. Garry (2004) “Animal Well-Being in the US Dairy Industry” J. B. Benson B. E. Rollin (Eds) The Well-Being of Farm Animals Blackwell Ames, IA 207–240

    Google Scholar 

  • K. J. Gaston T. M. Blackburn K. K. Goldewijk (2003) ArticleTitle“Habitat Conversion and Global Avian Biodiversity Loss” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270 1293–1300 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2002.2303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. J. Gaston K. L. Evans (2004) ArticleTitle“Birds and People in Europe” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 1649–1655 Occurrence Handle10.1098/rspb.2004.2782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, T. and M. Hauser, Animals Are Not Things: A View on Animal Welfare Based on Neurological Complexity (Dept. of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, 2002).

  • B. Gruzalski (1989) “The Case Against Raising and Killing Animals for Food” T. Regan P. Singer (Eds) Animal Rights and Human Obligations Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ 176–191

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Hajdin (1990) ArticleTitle“External and Now-for-Then Preferences in Hare’s Theory” Dialogue 29 305–310

    Google Scholar 

  • R. M. Hare (1993) “Why I am Only a Demi-Vegetarian” R. M. Hare (Eds) Essays on Bioethics Oxford University Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Harris P. Morris S. Wray D. Yalden (1995) A Review of British Mammals: Population Estimates and Conservation Status of British Mammals Other than Cetaceans JNCC Peterborough, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A., “Death and Utility,” New York Review of Books (1980), 27–32

  • Hastein, T., “Animal Welfare Issues Relating to Aquaculture,” in OIE, Proceedings of the Global Conference on Animal Welfare: An OIE initiative, (February 2004), pp. 219–227

  • Kaimowitz, D., B. Mertens, S. Wunder, and P. Pacheco, “Hamburger Connection Fuels Amazon Destruction: Cattle Ranching and Deforestation in Brazil’s Amazon,” (Center for International Forestry Research, 2004)

  • Keeling, L. J. and H. W. Gonyou (Eds) (2001) Social Behaviour in Farm Animals CABI Publishing Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Kerasote (1994) Bloodties: Nature, Culture, and the Hunt Kodansha America New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. K. Ng (1989a) ArticleTitle“What Should We Do About Future Generations? Impossibility of Parfit’s Theory X” Economics and Philosophy 5 IssueID2 235–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. K. Ng (1989b) ArticleTitle“Hurka’s Gamble and Methuselah’s Paradox: A Response to Cowen on Normative Population Theory” Social Choice and Welfare 6 45–49 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00433362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. K. Ng (1995) ArticleTitle“Towards Welfare Biology: Evolutionary Economics of Animal Consciousness and Suffering” Biology and Philosophy 10 255–285 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00852469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Parfit (1984) Reasons and Persons Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Personal correspondence, Cattle Facts estimate, reported by National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, Research Department, 2-19-04; Bill Roenigk, Vice President, National Chicken Council, personal communication, 2-23-04

  • R. H. Peters (1983) The Ecological Implications of Body Size Cambridge University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M., “An Animal’s Place,” New York Times Magazine, November 10, (2002), p. 58–64

  • R. A. Posner (2004) “Animal Rights: Legal, Philosophical, and Pragmatic Perspectives” C. R. Sunstein M. C. Nussbaum (Eds) Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions Oxford University Press New York 51–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, A., “An Economic Perspective on the United Egg Producers’ Animal Husbandry Guidelines for US Egg Laying Flocks,” Midwest Poultry Federation Convention Proceedings (St. Paul, MN., March 21, 2002), pp. 158–171

  • D. P. Reagan R. B. Waide (Eds) (1996) Food Web of a Tropical RainForest University of Chicago Press Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Rose D. Adams (1989) “Evidence for Pain and Suffering in Other Animals” G. Langley (Eds) Animal Experimentation: The Consensus Changes Chapman and Hall New York 42–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, H. “Logic of the Larder,” originally in H. Salt, The Humanities of Diet, 1914, and reprinted in T. Regan and P. Singer (eds.), Animal Rights and Human Obligations (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989)

  • P. Sandoe B. L. Nielsen L. G. Christensen P. Sorenson (1999) ArticleTitle“Staying Good While Playing God: The Ethics of Breeding Farm Animals” Animal Welfare 8 313–328 Occurrence Handle11933931

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • S. F. Sapontzis (1987) Morals, Reason, and Animals Temple University Press Philadelphia 177–196

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Scruton (2004) “The Conscientious Carnivore” S. Sapontzis (Eds) Food For Thought: The Debate over Eating Meat Prometheus Amherst, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • R. I. Sikora (1978) “Is it Wrong to Prevent the Existence of Future Generations?” R. I. Sikora B. Berry (Eds) Obligations to Future Generations Temple University Press Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Singer (1972) ArticleTitle“Famine, Affluence, and Morality Philosophy and Public Affairs” 1 IssueID1 229–243

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Singer (1999) “Response to Hare” D. Jamieson (Eds) Singer and His Critics Blackwell Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Singer (1993) Practical Ethics Cambridge University Press New York 103

    Google Scholar 

  • V. Smil (2000) Feeding the World MIT Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Stephen (1896) Social Rights and Duties: Addresses to Ethical Societies Macmillan and Co. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • L. W. Sumner (1978) “Classical Utilitarianism and the Population Optimum” R. I. Sikora B. Berry (Eds) Obligations to Future Generations Temple University Press Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Unger (1996) Living High and Letting Die Oxford University Press Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • United Soybean Board, Soybean Almanac (2002), http://www.unitedsoybean.org/soystats2002/statesoystats/cropyield.html. Accessed 29 January, 2005

  • USDA Economic Research Service, Food Consumption (per capita) Data System, http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/foodconsumption/datasystem.asp. Accessed 5 January, 2005

  • USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, Livestock and Poultry Slaughter Summaries for 2003, http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/. Accessed 5 January, 2005

  • Vesterby, M. and K. S. Krupa, Major Uses of Land in the United States, 1997, ERS Statistical Bulletin No. 973 (USDA, Washington DC, 2001), http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/sb973/

  • Warrick, J., “They Die Piece by Piece: In Overtaxed Plants, Humane Treatment of Cattle is Often a Battle Lost,” Washington Post, April 10, 2001, p. A01

  • Zakin, S., “Nonpoint Pollution: The Quiet Killer,” Field & Stream, August (1999), pp. 84–88

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai M. A. Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matheny, G., Chan, K.M.A. Human Diets and Animal Welfare: the Illogic of the Larder. J Agric Environ Ethics 18, 579–594 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-1805-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-1805-x

Keywords

Navigation