The identity of an academic discipline is essentially tied to production and reproduction of its disciplinary knowledge. This, in turn, determines the criteria of academic achievement for academicians belonging to a particular discipline. The ability of an academician to contribute to the disciplinary knowledge through publication of high-impact papers is considered to be of highest value in academic disciplines. This constitutes an essentialist paradigm of understanding academic disciplines. Such a paradigm, however, undervalues other equally important forms of academic labour, like academic service, which support, develop and repair the academic world through practice of care. In his paper, the essentialist paradigm is critically appraised through Paperwinner’s Model, an adaptation of Breadwinner’s Model. Through the lens of ethics of care, specifically Joan Tronto’s responsibility-based ethics, the paper offers an alternate paradigm, the deflationary perspective on academia, to acknowledge and evaluate the significance of caring practices. The paper concludes with a formative suggestion to institutionally recognize and reward care through service-intensive positions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
In this paper, academia denotes academic life as a whole, including scholars and students of the academic world and their activities. The term ‘academic world’ is also interchangeably used with the term ‘academia’. An academic discipline is a specific branch of knowledge institutionalised within academia through higher educational institutions. A citizen of academia, an academician, is a member of a specific academic discipline (including affiliated entities like professional organisations and associations) and a particular higher educational institution (and affiliated communities like committees).
In the 2004 study, a total of 107 surveys were sent to chairs, of which 74 surveys were returned. In the 2006 study, a total of 98 surveys were sent out to the chairs, of which 42 were returned. In total, 196 surveys were distributed to the faculty members, of which 56 were returned. Cipriano and Riccardi noted that the low rate of return can be attributed to the methodology which was exercised to distribute the surveys where chairs were requested to complete and further, share the additional surveys with two faculty members of their departments. Owing to this, it was not possible to ascertain whether the surveys reached faculty members or not.
Ajiferuke, I., Burell, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14, 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017100
Allmark, P. (1995). Can there be an ethics of care? Journal of Medical Ethics, 21, 19–24
Apostel, L. (1972). Conceptual Tools for Interdisciplinarity: An Operational Approach. Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities (pp. 141–180). Paris: OECD
Bailyn, L. (2003). Academic Careers and Gender Equity: Lessons Learned from MIT. Gender Work & Organization, 10, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00008
Baker, S. (1999). Success for Women in Academia: Choices, Experiences, and Challenges. Women in Science and Engineering: Choices for Success, 869(1), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08378.x
Balderston, F. E. (1995). Managing today’s university: Strategies for viability, change, and excellence. Jossey-Bass Publishers
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (6th ed.). Oxford University Press
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Open University Press
Bensimon, E. M., Ward, K., & Sanders, K. (2000). The Department Chair’s Role in Developing New Faculty into Teachers and Scholars. URL: Anker Publishing Company. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED443299
Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is Anyone Doing the Housework? Trends in the Gender Division of Household Labour. Social Forces, 79(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2675569
Blackford, R. (1998). Academia and Equal Pay. Quadrant, 42(9), 51–54
Boice, R. (2000). Advice for New Faculty Members: Nihil Nimus. Allyn & Bacon Press
Bubeck, D. (1995). Care, Gender and Justice. Clarendon Press
Cipriano, B., & Riccardi, R. (2009). Faculty expectations regarding personnel decisions. Special report: Faculty promotion and tenure: Eight ways to improve the tenure review process at your institution (Special Report). Faculty Focus. URL: http://www.facultyfocus.com/free-reports/faculty-promotion-and-tenure/
Cook, J. B. (2005). Doing the Tough Work: Care and the Dynamics of Community-University Engagement. Doctoral Dissertations – 2191. University of New Hampshire. URL: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2191
Cooper, K. S., & Miness, A. (2014). The Co-Creation of Caring Student-Teacher Relationships: Does Teacher Understanding Matter? The High School Journal, 97(4), 264–290. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43281034
Correll, S., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799
de Raeve, L. (1996). Caring intensively in philosophical problems. In D. Greaves, & H. Upton (Eds.), Health Care (pp. 9–22). Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
De Rond, M., & Millier, A. N. (2005). Publish or Perish: Bane or Boon of Academic Life? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 321–329
Demetrulias, D. M. (1994). Caring: Its Centrality to Teachers and Teacher Education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(2), 91–100. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23475736
Doyle, L. H., & Doyle, P. M. (2003). Building Schools as Caring Communities: Why, What, and How? The Clearing House, 76(5), 259–261. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30189844
Elliott, D. B. (2013). Salami Slicing and the SPU: Publish or Perish? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 3, 625–626
England, P. (2005). Emerging Theories of Care Work. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 381–399. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29737725
England, P., & Folbre, N. (1999). The Cost of Caring. The Annals of the American. Academy of Political and Social Science, 561, 39–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1049280
Engster, D. (2007). The Heart of Justice. Oxford University Press
Fairweather, J. (2002). The Mythologies of Faculty Productivity: Implications for Institutional Policy and Decision Making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26–48
Finkelstein, M. J., Seal, R. K., & Schuster, J. H. (1998). The new academic generation: a profession in transformation. Johns Hopkins University Press
Finsen, L. (2002). Faculty as institutional citizens: Reconvening service and governance work. In L. A. McMillin, & J. Berbert (Eds.), The new academic compact: Revisioning the relationship between faculty and their institutions (pp. 61–86). Anker Publishing House
Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Toward a Feminist Theory of Care. In K. Emily, Abel, & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives. State University of New York Press
Folbre, N., & Nelson, J. A. (2000). For Love or Money -- Or Both? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 123–140. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2647078
Gilligan, C. (1982). In A Different Voice. Harvard University Press
Glucksmann, M. (2000). Cottons and casuals: The gendered organisation of labour in time and space. Sociology Press
Guarino, C. M., & Borden, V. M. H. (2017). Faculty Service Loads and Gender: Are Women Taking Care of the Academic Family? Research in Higher Education, 58, 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2
Halwani, R. (2003). Virtuous Liaisons: Care, Love, Sex, and Virtue Ethics. Open Court Pub Ltd.
Hamington, M. (2004). Embodied Care: Jane Addams, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Feminist Ethics. University of Illinois Press
Hardré, P. L., & Cox, M. (2009). Expectations and standards of faculty performance in research-extensive universities. Research Papers in Education, 24, 383–419
Held, V. (2006). The Ethics of Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Holland, B. A. (1997). Analysing institutional commitment to service. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 4, 430–441
Holland, B. A. (1999). Factors and strategies that influence faculty involvement in public service. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 4, 37–43
Krishnan, A. (2009). What Are Academic Disciplines? Some Observations on the Disciplinarity vs. Interdisciplinarity Debate (Working paper). ESRC National Centre for Research Methods
Kuhse, H. (1997). Caring, Nurses, Women and Ethics. Blackwell Publishing House
Litt, J. S., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2003). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Global Perspectives on Gender and Carework: An Introduction. Gender and Society, 17(2), 156–165. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3594685
Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet-Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y., Gorenstein, M. A., Holdgraf, C., Hoy, C. W., Ivanova, M. V., Jimenez, R. T., Jun, S., Kam, J. W. Y., Kidd, C., Marcelle, E., & Dronkers, N. F. (2021). Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron, 109(13), 2047–2074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002
Lucas-Thompson, R. G., & Goldberg, W. A. (2015). Gender ideology and work–family plans of the next generation. Gender and the work-family experience (pp. 3–19). Springer
Luchs, C., Seymoure, S., & Smith, W. (2011). An Examination of Faculty Beliefs Concerning P&T Decisions. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 4, 35. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v4i12.6660
Lynton, E. A. (1995). Making the case for professional service. Stylus Publishing
McClellan, B. (1999). Moral education in America: schools and the shaping of character from colonial times to the present. Teachers College Press
McLaren, M. (2001). Feminist Ethics: Care as a Virtue. Feminists Doing Ethics. Rowman and Littlefield
Meagher, G. (2002). Is It Wrong to Pay for Housework? Hypatia, 17(2), 52–66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810750
Meyer, M. (2000). Care work: Gender, class, and the welfare state. Routledge
Meyers, S. A. (2009). Do your students care whether you care about them? College Teaching, 57(4), 205–210. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25763396
Milligan, C., & Wiles, J. (2010). Landscapes of care. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 736–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510364556
Mitrano, B. S. (2014). Men, Teaching, and Caring: Perspectives and Possibilities. Schools: Studies in Education, 11(2), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1086/678220
O’Meara, K. A. (2016). Whose Problem Is It? Gender Differences in Faculty Thinking About Campus Service. Teachers College Record, 118, 1–38
Neetha, N. (2010). Estimating Unpaid Care Work: Methodological Issues in Time Use Surveys. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(44/45), 73–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20787532
Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Co-authorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101 (Suppl 1), 5200–5205. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307545100
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press
Noddings, N. (1999). Justice and Caring: The Search for Common Ground in Education. Teachers College Press
Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771–781. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42001791
Paley, J. (2006). Past caring - The limitations of one-to-one ethics. In A. J. Davis, V. Tschudin, & de L. Raeve (Eds.), Essentials of Teaching and Learning in Nursing Ethics (pp. 149–164). Churchill Livingstone
Penn State Altoona University (2018). Service and the Scholarship of Service to the University, Society, and the Profession. URL: https://altoona.psu.edu/offices-divisions/academic-affairs/promotion-tenure/education-human-development-social-sciences/service-and-scholarship-service-university-society-and-profession
Perry, C. M., Russell, J., & Quaglia (1997). Perceptions of Teacher Caring: Questions and Implications for Teacher Education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 24(2), 75–82. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478135
Pfeifer, H. L. (2016). How to be a Good Academic Citizen: The Role and Importance of Service in Academia. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 27(2), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2015.1128706
Plume, A. (2013). Publish or Perish: Maximizing the Impact of your Next Publication, City Graduate School Welcome Event, 18 November. URL: https://www.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/218487/1119-Publish-or-perish-Andrew-Plume.pdf
Plume, A., & Van Weijen, D. (2014). Publish or Perish? The Rise of the Fractional Author. Research Trends, 30(3), 16–18
Rachels, J. (1999). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. McGraw-Hill
Rainnie, A., Goods, C., Bahn, S., & Burgess, J. (2013). The Challenges of Working in Australian Academia: An Introduction. Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work, 23(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2013.839080
Ruddick, S. (1998). Care as Labour and Relationship. In M. S. Haflon, & J. C. Haber (Eds.), Norms and Values: Essays on the Work of Virginia Held. Rowman & Littlefield
Slote, M. (2007). The Ethics of Care and Empathy. Routledge
Straits, W. (2007). ‘She’s Teaching Me’: Teaching with Care in a Large Lecture Course. College Teaching, 55(4), 170–175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27559340
Sevenhuijsen, S. (1998). Citizenship and the Ethics of Care. Routledge
Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2002). Gender and New Public Management: Reconstituting Academic Subjectivities. Gender Work and Organization, 9(4), 372–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00165
Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. State University of New York Press
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. Routledge
Tronto, J. (2006). Women and Caring: What can Feminists learn about morality from Caring?. In V. Held (Ed.), Justice and Care: Essential Readings in Feminist Ethics (pp. 101–115). Westview Press
Walker, U. (1997). Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics. Oxford University Press
Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report - Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series, 29, 5
This paper has been possible with the help of many vibrant discussions and debates, over the past two years, with Alan Nelson Isaac, Deepshikha Sharma (Teaching Fellow, KREA University), and Jayshree Jha (PhD Candidate, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi). I would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers who shared their thoughts and perspective, motivating me to question and address diverse tangents related to the theme. Further, many thanks to the following citizens of my academic world for sharing their perspectives on research, and academic service, which stimulated me to think about its varying aspects - Dr. Balaganapathi Devarakonda (Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Delhi), Dr. R. Krishnaswamy (Associate Professor, Jindal School of Liberal Arts and Humanities), Dr. Meenakshi Singh Tomar (Associate Professor, Jindal Global Business School, O P Jindal Global University), Dr. Tanushree Sharma (Professor, Jindal Global Business School, O P Jindal Global University), Dr. Lakhnath Jaysinghe (Professor, Jindal Global Business School, O P Jindal Global University), and Dr. Diptiman Banerjee (Associate Professor, Jindal Global Business School, O P Jindal Global University).
Statements and Declarations
I confirm that I have read, understand, and agreed to the submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration of the journal.
I confirm that the manuscript is the authors’ original work and the manuscript has not received prior publication and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
I confirm that the paper now submitted is not copied or plagiarized version of some other published work.
I declare that I shall not submit the paper for publication in any other Journal or Magazine till the decision is made by journal editors.
I declare that no funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
I confirm that data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rajan, S.V. The Paperwinner’s Model in Academia and Undervaluation of Care Work. J Acad Ethics (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09460-6
- Academic service
- Ethics of care