Skip to main content

Restoring Honor and Integrity Through Integrating Restorative Practices in Academic Integrity with Student Leaders


This article examines one institution’s transition from a legalistic approach for resolving cases of academic misconduct to a learning-centered approach that embraces peer-to-peer student-led meetings. The article provides detailed information on how to train students on conducting these meetings along with suggestions for future research. The results of this article provide a framework for institutions who wish to engage students in a learning-centered adjudication model for resolving cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. ACPA. (2010). Student Conduct Board Manual and Reference (Second Ed.). American College Personnel Association.

  2. Baetz, M., Zivcakova, L., Wood, E., Nosko, A., De Pasquale, D., & Archer, K. (2011). Encouraging active classroom discussion of academic integrity and misconduct in higher education business contexts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9(3), 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boots, C. C. (1987). Human development theory applied to judicial affairs work. In. R. Caruso & W. W. Travelstead (Eds.). Enhancing campus judicial systems. New Directions for Student Services, 39, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  4. Clark, K. L. (2014). A call for restorative justice in higher education judicial affairs. College Student Journal, 48(4), 705–713. 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drinan, P., & Gallant, T. (2008). Plagiarism and academic integrity systems. Journal of Library Administration, 47(3–4), 125–140.

  6. Grimsrud, T., & Zehr, H. (2002). Rethinking God, Justice, and Treatment of Offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35(3–4), 253–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Henningsen, M., Valde, K., & Denbow, J. (2013). Academic Misconduct: A goals-plans-action approach to peer confrontation and whistle-blowing. Communication Education, 62(2), 148–168.

  8. Itin, C. M. (1999). Reasserting the Philosophy of Experiential Education as a Vehicle for Change in the 21st Century. Journal of Experiential Education, 22(2), 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Janosik, S. M., & Stimpson, M. T. (2017). The influence of the conduct system and campus environments on student learning. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 54(1), 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karp, D., & Conrad, S. (2005). Restorative justice and college Student Misconduct. Public Organization Review, 5(4), 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karp, D., & Sacks, C. (2014). Student conduct, restorative justice, and student development: findings from the STARR project: a student accountability and restorative research project. Contemporary Justice Review, 17(2), 154–172.

  12. Kibler, W. L. (1993). A framework for addressing academic dishonesty from a student development perspective. NASPA Journal, 31, 8–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malizia, D., & Jameson, J. (2018). Hidden in plain view: The impact of mediation on the mediator and implications for conflict resolution education. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 35(1), 301–318.

  14. McCabe, D. L., & Makowski, A. L. (2001). Resolving allegations of academic dishonesty. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 6(1), 17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, A., Murdock, T., Anderman, E., & Poindexter, A. (2007). Who are all these cheaters? Characteristics of academically dishonest students. In E. Anderman & T. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating (pp. 9–32). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Malis, R. S., & Roloff, M. E. (2007). The Effect of Legitimacy and Intimacy on Peer Interventions into Alcohol Abuse. Western Journal of Communication, 71(1), 49–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pointer, L. (2018). Restorative practices in residence halls at Victoria University of Wellington. New Zealand. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 36(3), 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson, D. A. (1988). An Opportunity to Be Heard: The Right to Counsel in a Deportation Hearing. Wash. L. Rev., 63, 1019.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of ADOLESCENTS' Motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 101–111.

  20. Schrader, P. G., & Brown, S. W. (2008). Evaluating the first Year Experience: Students’ KNOWLEDGE, attitudes, and behaviors. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(2), 310–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schraw, G., Olafson, L., & Wadkins, T. (2007). Doing the things we do: A grounded theory of academic procrastination. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz, B. M., Tatum, H. E., & Hageman, M. C. (2013). College students’ perceptions of and responses to cheating AT Traditional, modified, and Non-Honor System institutions. Ethics & Behavior, 23(6), 463–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stehno, J. (1986). The application and integration of experiential education in higher education. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University, Touch of Nature Environmental Center.

  24. Stephens, J. M., & Gehlbach, H. (2007). Under pressure and underengaged. Psychology of Academic Cheating, 107-134.

  25. Vandehey, M., Diekhoff, G., & LaBeff, E. (2007). College cheating: A twenty-year follow-up and the addition of an honor code. Journal of College Student Development, 48(4), 468–480.

  26. Whetten, D., & Cameron, K. (2014). Developing Management Skills: Global Edition. Pearson Higher Ed.

  27. Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(3), 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yachison, S., Okoshken, J., & Talwar, V. (2018). Students’ Reactions to a Peer’s Cheating Behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 747–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zehr, H. (1997). Restorative justice: The concept: Movement sweeping criminal justice field focuses on harm and responsibility. Corrections Today, 59, 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zehr, H. (1998). Fundamental concepts of restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review.

  31. Zehr, H. (2004). Commentary: Restorative justice: Beyond victim-offender mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22(1), 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zivcakova, L., Wood, E., Forsyth, G., Zivcak, M., Shapiro, J., Coulas, A., & Angardi, V. (2014). Investigating perceptions of students to a peer-based academic integrity presentation provided by residence dons. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(2), 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Earl Orr Jr..

Ethics declarations

Ethical Standards

We have complied with the ethical standards outlined by the journal.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orr, J.E., Orr, K. Restoring Honor and Integrity Through Integrating Restorative Practices in Academic Integrity with Student Leaders. J Acad Ethics (2021).

Download citation


  • Academic misconduct
  • Academic integrity
  • Honor codes
  • Cheating
  • Sanctions
  • Universities