Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Virtue, Utility and Improvisation: A Multinational Survey of Academic Staff Solving Integrity Dilemmas

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Academic staff owe a duty of fidelity to uphold institutional standards of integrity. They also have their own values and conceptions of integrity as well as personal responsibilities and commitments. The question of how academic practitioners address or reconcile conflicting values and responsibilities has been underexplored in the literature. Before we can examine effectiveness of academic integrity strategies and develop best practices, we need to examine the breadth of integrity decisions. To this end we posited the academic integrity problem as a set of seven dilemmas and presented them to post-secondary education staff (N = 80) located in Europe, North America, Oceania, and Asia. We asked the participants to recommend a solution to each dilemma. This yielded a modest sample of 498 themes across 30 categories. We expected the responses to fall on a binary scale where decisions either support the integrity or ignore it. However, the data suggests that academic integrity decisions are better suited to continuum where participants aim to reconcile personal and institutional obligations. We further argue that academic integrity decisions are predicated on personal experience and therefore pose a challenge for policy standardization and enforcement. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of the findings for practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Academic Integrity Policy. (2014). School of Education, Wilkes University. https://www.wilkes.edu/academics/graduate-programs/masters-programs/graduate-education/_assets/Academic%20Integrity%20PolicyFinalWilkes42814_Current.pdf

  • Amigud, A., & Dawson, P. (2019). The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1612851

  • Amigud, A., & Lancaster, T. (2019). 246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students’ reasons for seeking to outsource academic work. Computers & Education, 134, 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.017

  • Amigud, A., & Pell, D. J. (2020). When academic integrity rules should not apply: a survey of academic staff. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1826900

  • Baldwin, B. T. (1915). Present status of the honor system in colleges and universities. Bulletin, 1915, No. 8. Whole Number 632. United States Bureau of Education, Department of the Interior.

  • Ballentine, B., Burke, D., Davenport, M., Davis, L., Henderson, B., Irons, J., Kapel, S., Kloeppel, B., Koett, K., & Railsback, B. (2019). Academic Integrity Task Force Report. https://www.wcu.edu/WebFiles/PDFs/FS_Academic_Integrity_TaskForce_Report.pdf

  • Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., James, C., Green, M., East, J., McGowan, U., & Patridge, L. (2011). Core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7(2).

  • Bruton, S., & Childers, D. (2016). The ethics and politics of policing plagiarism: A qualitative study of faculty views on student plagiarism and Turnitin®. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(2), 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caviola, L., & Faber, N. S. (2014). How stress influences our morality. In-Mind Magazine, 23.

  • Coalter, T., Lim, C. L., & Wanorie, T. (2007). Factors that influence faculty actions: a study on faculty responses to academic dishonesty. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), n1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.

  • Coren, A. (2011). Turning a blind eye: faculty who ignore student cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9(4), 291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C., & Nixon, E. (2019). The social anatomy of ‘collusion.’ British Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, G. J., Slade, C., Bretag, T., & McNeill, M. (2021). Developing and evaluating nationwide expert-delivered academic integrity workshops for the higher education sector in Australia. Higher Education Research & Development, 1–16.

  • Dawson, P., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2018). Can training improve marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating? A multi-disciplinary pre-post study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–11.

  • de Maio, C., Dixon, K., & Yeo, S. (2020). Responding to student plagiarism in Western Australian universities: the disconnect between policy and academic staff. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(1), 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drago, R., Colbeck, C. L., Stauffer, K. D., Pirretti, A., Burkum, K., Fazioli, J., Lazzaro, G., & Habasevich, T. (2006). The avoidance of bias against caregiving: the case of academic faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(9), 1222–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, S. E., Crossman, K., & Edino, R. (2019). Academic Integrity in Canada: An Annotated Bibliography. Online Submission. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED593995.pdf

  • Eisenberg-Berg, N. (1979). Development of children’s prosocial moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, 15(2), 128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fendler, R. J., & Godbey, J. M. (2016). Cheaters should never win: eliminating the benefits of cheating. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler, R. L., & Kaner, C. (2010). Plagiarism-detection services: how well do they actually perform? Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, 29(4), 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fister, I., Jr., Fister, I., & Perc, M. (2016). Toward the discovery of citation cartels in citation networks. Frontiers in Physics, 4, 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, R. S. (2003). Confronting academic dishonesty in the accounting classroom: A cultural experience? Accounting Education, 12(4), 437–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928032000128430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. (2018). “Hungry for an Education”: Prevalence and Outcomes of Food Insecurity Among Students at a Primarily Undergraduate University in Rural Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Higher Education/Revue canadienne d'enseignement supérieur, 48(2), 109-129. https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/cjhe/1900-v1-n1-cjhe04386/1057106ar/abstract/

  • Garrison, J. (2019, March 13). Everything you need to know about the nation’s largest-ever college cheating scandal involving Felicity Huffman and Lori Loughlin. USA Today. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2019/03/13/felicity-huffman-lori-loughlin-william-macy-college-admission-bribery-case/3149286002/

  • Gottardello, D., & Karabag, S. F. (2020). Ideal and actual roles of university professors in academic integrity management: A comparative study Studies in Higher Education 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1767051

  • Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biology, 13(3).

  • Heckler, N. C., Rice, M., & Hobson Bryan, C. (2013). Turnitin systems: a deterrent to plagiarism in college classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(3), 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higbee, J. L., Schultz, J. L., & Sanford, T. (2011). Student perspectives on behaviors that constitute cheating. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 4(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v4i10.5968

  • Hodges, A., Bickham, T., Schmidt, E., & Seawright, L. (2017). Challenging the profiles of a plagiarist: a study of abstracts submitted to an international interdisciplinary conference. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 13(1), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhtala, M., & Feldt, T. (2016). The path from ethical organisational culture to employee commitment: mediating roles of value congruence and work engagement. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1.

  • Hulsart, R., & McCarthy, V. (2009). Educators’ role in promoting academic integrity. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 13(4), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husu, J., & Tirri, K. (2001). Teachers’ ethical choices in sociomoral settings. Journal of Moral Education, 30(4), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C., & Davies, R. (2020). Using digital forensic techniques to identify contract cheating: a case study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09358-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith-Spiegel, P., Tabachnick, B. G., Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Washburn, J. (1998). Why professors ignore cheating: Opinions of a national sample of psychology instructors. Ethics & Behavior, 8(3), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Z. R., Hemnani, P., Raheja, S., & Joshy, J. (2020). Raising awareness on contract cheating–lessons learned from running campus-wide campaigns. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09365-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krawczyk, R. M. (1997). Teaching ethics: effect on moral development. Nursing Ethics, 4(1), 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2011). Agreement and information in the reliability of coding. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(2), 93–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krstić, S. B. (2015). Research integrity practices from the perspective of early-career researchers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1181–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lens, J. (2021). Operation varsity blues and the NCAA’s special admission exception. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 31(1), 147–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, L. G. (2001). Misattribution in legal scholarship: plagiarism, ghostwriting, and authorship. South Texas Law Review, 42, 467. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/stexlr42&div=26&id=&page=

  • MacLeod, P. D., & Eaton, S. E. (2020). The paradox of faculty attitudes toward student violations of academic integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09363-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., Shoptaugh, C., & Wooldridge, J. (2011). Reasons not to cheat, academic-integrity responsibility, and frequency of cheating. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903567830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. L., & Holme, T. A. (2015). What might cell phone-based cheating on tests mean for chemistry education?

  • Newton, D. (2020, August 7). Another problem with shifting education online: a rise in cheating. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/another-problem-with-shifting-education-online-a-rise-in-cheating/2020/08/07/1284c9f6-d762-11ea-aff6-220dd3a14741_story.html

  • Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Mellar, H., & Aleksieva, L. (2019). Using a student authentication and authorship checking system as a catalyst for developing an academic integrity culture: a bulgarian case study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 17(3), 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransome, J., & Newton, P. M. (2018). Are we educating educators about academic integrity? A study of UK higher education textbooks. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1300636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, J. (2013, June 5). Is academic nepotism a good thing? | Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/sounding-board/academic-nepotism-good-thing

  • Rumyantseva, N. L. (2005). Taxonomy of corruption in higher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(1), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selart, M., & Johansen, S. T. (2011). Ethical decision making in organizations: the role of leadership stress. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard, K., Trotman, T., Furnari, M., & Löfström, E. (2015). Teaching research integrity in higher education: policy and strategy. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(6), 615–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. L. (2018). Normative changes and individual differences in early moral judgments: a constructivist developmental perspective. Human Development, 61(4–5), 264–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spear, J. A., & Miller, A. N. (2012). The effects of instructor fear appeals and moral appeals on cheating-related attitudes and behavior of university students. Ethics & Behavior, 22(3), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.659603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoesz, B. M., Eaton, S. E., Miron, J., & Thacker, E. J. (2019). Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0042-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoesz, B. M., Seeland, J., MacLeod, P., Vogt, L., Markovics, L., Denham, T., Gervais, L., & Usick, B. (2020). Creating a collaborative network to promote cultures of academic integrity in Manitoba’s post-secondary institutions. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 3(1), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. C., Delavega, E., Jin, S. W., Neely-Barnes, S. L., & Elswick, S. E. (2019). The Prevalence and Correlates of Food Insecurity among Students at a Multi-Campus University. Journal of Poverty, 23(7), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2019.1656141

  • The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.). (2021). International center for academic integrity [ICAI]. https://www.academicintegrity.org/fundamental-values/

  • Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J., de Vries, B., & Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas. Child Development, 842–858.

  • Waugh, R. F., Godfrey, J. R., Evans, E. D., & Craig, D. (1995). Measuring students' perceptions about cheating in six countries. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049539508257503

  • Weaver, R. R., Vaughn, N. A., Hendricks, S. P., McPherson-Myers, P. E., Jia, Q., Willis, S. L., & Rescigno, K. P. (2020). University student food insecurity and academic performance. Journal of American College Health, 68(7), 727–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1600522

  • Weber, J. (1990). Managers’ moral reasoning: assessing their responses to three moral dilemmas. Human Relations, 43(7), 687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, J. (2017, October 9). “Credible threats Of personal violence” lead To retraction of colonialism paper (updated). Daily Nous. http://dailynous.com/2017/10/09/credible-threats-personal-violence-lead-retraction-colonialism-paper/

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2001). Academic integrity as an institutional issue. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, D. E. (2019). Feeding the student body: Unequal food insecurity among college students. American Journal of Health Education, 50(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2019.1590261

  • Worthington, E., Taylor, K., & Investigations, A. B. C. (2019, October 22). “Highly intimidatory”: 50 of Australia’s most distinguished academics call for uni to drop case against whistleblower [Text]. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-22/academics-call-for-university-to-drop-case-against-whistleblower/11625000

  • Zastrow, M. (2019). More south korean academics caught naming kids as co-authors. Nature, 575(7782), 267–268. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03371-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlomislic, D. (2019, February 3). Ryerson’s student union facing forensic audit of $700K in questionable expenses | The Star. The Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2019/02/02/ryersons-student-union-facing-forensic-audit-of-700k-in-questionable-expenses.html

Download references

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to the European Network for Academic Integrity and the International Center for Academic Integrity, for their assistance in disseminating the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for the Study of Social Processes, Toronto, Canada

    Alexander Amigud

  2. The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK

    David J. Pell

Authors
  1. Alexander Amigud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David J. Pell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Amigud.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study received a favourable opinion from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Open University (ref: HREC/3431/Pell).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amigud, A., Pell, D.J. Virtue, Utility and Improvisation: A Multinational Survey of Academic Staff Solving Integrity Dilemmas. J Acad Ethics 20, 311–333 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09416-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09416-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation