Research over the past three decades on the gender gap in STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) has consistently found an underrepresentation of females pursuing STEM degrees and careers. This is, at its foundation, an educational ethics issue. Schools at all levels, ranging all the way from middle school to graduate school, have a responsibility to prepare more females for careers in STEM. Experts have proposed a variety of fixes to encourage female students to study STEM, including increased funding, some of which have helped, and yet the gap remains. This paper examines one such effort to address this education and ethics issue - voluntary (elective) programs outside of normal school hours that provide young female students’ opportunities for active participation and engagement in STEM. Are these enrichment programs actually increasing subsequent female participation rates? The authors use a correlational study in an attempt to determine whether there is a positive correlation between participation in a voluntary before school STEM program (in grades 6–8), and their subsequent enrollment in STEM courses in high school, and/or in college and career. The authors surveyed intermediate school students, and the results showed that although voluntary before-school programs may not increase female interest in STEM, they do help to maintain long-term interest by those who have already demonstrated an inclination toward STEM. This is a pilot study with a limited number of subjects from one geographical area. Future research should be conducted that focuses on a larger nationwide sample to determine if school enrichment programs indeed act as career influencers for female students.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bazilio, A., Ryan, A., & Welborn, J. (2016). Science cafes: An affordable, easy-to-implement model that introduces young girls to STEM-related topics, careers, and role models. Science Scope, 40(3), 14–17 http://www.jstor.org/stable/24894483.
Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation . Economics and statistics administration issue brief: 04–11. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/womeninstemagaptoinnovation8311.pdf.
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214549471.
Dave, V., Blasko, D., Hollida-Darr, K., Kremer, J., Edwards, R., Ford, M., Lenhardt, L., & Hildo, B. (2012). Re-enJEANeering STEM education: Math options summer camp. The Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 35–45 http://www.jstor.org/stable/43604249.
Edzie, R. (2014). Exploring the factors that influence and motivate female students to enroll and persist in collegiate STEM degree programs: A mixed methods study. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1175&context=cehsedaddiss
Hill, C., Corbett, C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women. https://www.aauw.org/files/2013/02/Why-So-Few-Women-in-Science. Technology-Engineering-and-Mathematics.pdf.
Master, A., Cheryan, S., Moscatelli, A., & Meltzoff, A. (2017). Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.0130022-0965.
Meadows, M. (2016). Where are all the talented girls? How can we help them achieve in science technology engineering and mathematics? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2016222219.
Narayanan, N., & Sturtz, R. (2018). Success in the STEM curricula. College Quarterly. 21(2). http://collegequarterly.ca/2018-vol21-num02-spring/success-in-the-stem-curricula.html
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (U.S.). (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) for Americas future: Executive report. Washington, D.C., Executive Office of the President. https://nsf.gov/attachments/117803/public/2a--Prepare_and_Inspire--PCAST.pdf
Stoeger, H., Hopp, M., & Ziegler, A. (2017). Online mentoring as an extracurricular measure to encourage talented girls in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics): An empirical study of one-on-one versus group mentoring. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217702215
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology., 100(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Stanberry, K., Stanberry, C. & Reeves, T. A Persistent Academic Ethical Dilemma: Too Few Female Students in STEM Five Decades after Title IX. J Acad Ethics 19, 25–34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09370-5
- Enrichment programs
- Female students
- Educational system
- Title IX