Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(4), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5.
Arrowsmith, J. (2011). Phase II failures: 2008–2010. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10(5), 328–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3439.
Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533(7604), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.
Bosch, X. (2011). Europe must address research misconduct. Nature, 480(7376), 181–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/480181c.
Boulbes, D. R., Costello, T., Baggerly, K., Fan, F., Wang, R., Bhattacharya, R., Ye, X., & Ellis, L. M. (2018). A survey on data reproducibility and the effect of publication process on the ethical reporting of laboratory research. Clinical Cancer Research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 24(14), 3447–3455. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0227.
Broome, M. E., Pryor, E., Habermann, B., Pulley, L., & Kincaid, H. (2005). The scientific misconduct questionnaire—Revised (SMQ-R): Validation and psychometric testing. Accountability in Research, 12(4), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620500440253.
Carpenter, S. (2012). Scientific misconduct. Government sanctions Harvard psychologist. Science (New York, N.Y.), 337(6100), 1283. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.337.6100.1283.
Cosentino, M., & Picozzi, M. (2013). Transparency for each research article. Institutions must also be accountable for research integrity. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 347, f5477. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5477.
Fanelli D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One, 4(5), e5738.
Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS One, 10(6), e0127556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127556.
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(42), 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
Freedman, L. P., Cockburn, I. M., & Simcoe, T. S. (2015). The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLoS Biology, 13(6), e1002165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165.
Gammon, E., & Franzini, L. (2013). Research misconduct oversight: Defining case costs. Journal of Health Care Finance, 40(2), 75–99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24551963. Accessed 26 April 2019.
Godecharle, S., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2013). Guidance on research integrity: No union in Europe. Lancet (London, England), 381(9872), 1097–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60759-X.
Godlee, F., Smith, J., & Marcovitch, H. (2011). Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 342, c7452. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c7452.
Helgesson, G., & Eriksson, S. (2018). Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 21(3), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9817-7.
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2008). Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology, 19(5), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131e7.
Keller, F., Dhaini, S., Briel, M., Henrichs, S., Höchsmann, C., Kalbermatten, D., Künzli, N., Mollet, A., Puelacher, C., Schmidt-Trucksäss, A., von Niederhäusern, B., & de Geest, S. (2018). How to conceptualize and implement a PhD program in health sciences-the Basel approach. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 5, 2382120518771364. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120518771364.
Kumar, M. N. (2008). A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9068-6.
Lu, S. F., Jin, G. Z., Uzzi, B., & Jones, B. (2013). The retraction penalty: Evidence from the web of science. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 3146. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03146.
Marini, G. (2017). New promotion patterns in Italian universities: Less seniority and more productivity? Data from ASN. Higher Education, 73(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0008-x.
Marino, I. R., & Cirillo, C. (2014). The state of research in Europe and in Italy: The risks of short-sighted decisions. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 59(9), 2036–2039. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3303-3.
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738. https://doi.org/10.1038/435737a.
Mastroianni, A. C. (2008). Sustaining public trust: Falling short in the protection of human research participants. Hastings Center Report, 38(3), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1353/hcr.0.0012.
Nwo.nl. (n.d.). Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. https://www.nwo.nl/en/policies/scientific+integrity+policy/netherlands+code+of+conduct+for+research+integrity. Accessed 28 July 2019.
Okonta, P., & Rossouw, T. (2013). Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a Group of Researchers in Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics, 13(3), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x.
Okonta, P. I., & Rossouw, T. (2014). Misconduct in research: A descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country. BMC Medical Ethics, 15(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-25.
ORI - The Office of Research Integrity. (2019). Case Summaries. https://ori.hhs.gov/case_summary. Accessed 25 April 2019.
Pain, E. (2008). Research integrity: Making the right choices. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.a0800001.
Parlangeli, O., Guidi, S., Marchigiani, E., Bracci, M., & Liston, P. M. (2019). Perceptions of work-related stress and ethical misconduct amongst non-tenured researchers in Italy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00091-6.
Prinz, F., Schlange, T., & Asadullah, K. (2011). Believe it or not: How much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10(9), 712–712. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3439-c1.
Pryor, E. R., Habermann, B., & Pryor, E. R. (2007). Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: A national survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.016394.
Pupovac, V., & Fanelli, D. (2015). Scientists admitting to plagiarism: A meta-analysis of surveys. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1331–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6.
Pupovac, V., Prijić-Samaržija, S., & Petrovečki, M. (2017). Research misconduct in the Croatian scientific community: A survey assessing the forms and characteristics of research misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9767-0.
Resnik, D. B., & Shamoo, A. E. (2017). Reproducibility and research integrity. Accountability in Research, 24(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1257387.
Resnik, D. B., Neal, T., Raymond, A., & Kissling, G. E. (2015). Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions. Accountability in Research, 22(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.891943.
Retraction Watch. (2018). Are you liable for misconduct by scientific collaborators? What a recent court decision could mean for scientists – Retraction Watch. 2018. http://retractionwatch.com/2018/08/13/are-you-liable-for-misconduct-by-scientific-collaborators-what-a-recent-court-decision-means-for-scientists/. Accessed 28 July 2019.
Retraction watch. (2019). http://retractionwatch.com/. Accessed 26 May 2019.
Saunders, R., & Savulescu, J. (2008). Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: What can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud? Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(3), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2007.023721.
Seeber, M., Cattaneo, M., Meoli, M., & Malighetti, P. (2019). Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions. Research Policy, 48(2), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2017.12.004.
Service, R. F. (2003). Scientific misconduct. More of bell labs physicist’s papers retracted. Science (New York, N.Y.), 299(5603), 31. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.299.5603.31b.
Smith, R. (2000). What is research misconduct? In C. White (Ed.), The COPE Report 2000: Annual Report of the Committee on Publication Ethics. (BMJ Books., p. 7). London: BMJ Publishing Group.
Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022268.
Stern, A. M., Casadevall, A., Steen, R. G., & Fang, F. C. (2014). Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications. eLife, 3, e02956. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02956.
van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2012). Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1282–1293. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22636.