Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Raising Awareness on Contract Cheating –Lessons Learned from Running Campus-Wide Campaigns

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contract cheating is a growing menace that most academic institutions are grappling with globally. With governments now taking steps to help combat the industry and ban such services, it is also important to encourage students to stay away from such services through proactive strategies to raise awareness so that students stop using such services. This paper uses a case study approach to capture a time-series data from three years of a university campus’s efforts to raise awareness by celebrating the International Centre for Academic Integrity (ICAI)‘s International Day of Action Against Contract Cheating. This is in order to explore if such campaigns can be used as tools to increase student understanding of contract cheating as an academic misconduct issue and what roles students can play in raising awareness among other students on contract cheating. Proposing to look at contract cheating as a social issue, the paper positions the misconduct as such and explores how awareness campaigns can help address contract cheating. Over the three years, results show steep increase in awareness of contract cheating, a type of academic misconduct, and that students themselves have a positive influence on other students when raising awareness. An interesting finding of the study is that graduated students have had an impact by showing responsibility to younger students and by actively denouncing contract cheating companies and their approaches on social media; thus providing solid evidence that awareness campaigns can help increase awareness which is the first step towards building a culture of integrity in any campus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Academicintegrity.org (2014). The Fundamental Values. [online] Available at: https://academicintegrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Fundamental-Values-2014.pdf. Accessed 23 Mar. 2019.

  • Anderman, E. M., Friesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 84–93 American Psychology Association, Inc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awdry, R., & Newton, P. (2019). Staff views on commercial contract cheating in higher education: a survey study in Australia and the UK. Higher Education.

  • Baggish, R., & Wells, p. (2019, July 20). Academic honesty and the independent school. Retrieved from Independent School Health Check: https://independentschoolhealth.com/research/academic-honesty-independent-school/

  • Bishop, Michael. “What’s wrong with cheating?” in synthesis: Law and policy in higher education, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blachnio, A., & Weremko, M. (2011). Academic cheating is contagious: The influence of the presence of others on honesty. A study report. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 1(1), 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (2004). The cheating culture: Why more Americans are doing wrong to get ahead. Harcourt, Inc.

  • Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. (2004). Substance Abuse Treatment and Family Therapy. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series, No. 39.) Chapter 2 Impact of Substance Abuse on Families. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK64258/

  • Champlin, G. (1991). Proactive and reactive strategies. The arc of Berks County newsletter. USA: Wyomissing Behaviour Abalysts, Ltd. Retrieved from http://www.wba2032.com/Topics7.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen-Hughes, J. M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. and Lancaster, T. (2013), Commercial aspects of contract cheating. In Proceedings of 8th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2013), Canterbury, UK.

  • Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. Second Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policy Conference. Newcastle UK.

  • Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A. and Sheikh, A., 2011. The case study approach. [online] Available at: <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3141799/> [Accessed 20 Mar. 2019].

  • Cutler, D. (2019, July 20). How to curb student cheating. Retrieved from Medium Education: https://medium.com/@spincutler/how-to-curb-student-cheating-9cf3bf2f436f

  • Dawson, P., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2017). Can markers detect contract cheating? Results from a pilot study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education., 43(2), 286–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, S., Mergl, R., Freudenberg, P., Althaus, D., & Hegerl, U. (2009). Impact of a campaign on the public's attitudes towards depression. Health Education Research, 25(1), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolnicar, S., Grün, B., & Leisch, F. (2011). Quick, simple and reliable : Forced binary survey questions. International Journal of Market Research, 53(2), 231–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D'souza, K. A., & Siegfeldt, D. V. (2017). A conceptual framework for detecting cheating in online and take-home exams. Journal of Innovative Education.

  • Foltynek, T., & Kralikova, V. (2018). Analysis of the contract cheating market in Czechia. International Journal for Educational Integrity.

  • Fox, C. R. (2006). The availability heuristic in the classroom: How soliciting more criticism can boost your course ratings. Judgement and Decision making, 1(1), 86–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R., & Myers, R. (1941). The natural history of a social problem. American Sociological Review, 320–328.

  • Grassi, M., Nucera, A., Zanolin, E., Omenaas, E., Anto, J. M., & Leynaert, B. (2007). Performance comparison of Likert and binary formats of SF-36 version 1.6 across ECRHS II adult populations. Value in Health, 10(6), 478–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harp, J., & Taietz, P. (1966). Academic Integrity and Social Structure: a study of cheating among college students. JSTOR, 13(4), 365–373 URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/798585?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, H., Birks, M., Franklin, R., & Mills, J. (2017). Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. Forum qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1) ISSN 1438-5627.

  • Heale, R. and Twycross, A., 2017. What is a case study?. Evidence-Based Nursing, [online] 20(1), 7. Available at: doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2017-102845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, S. (2018) Shame, guilt, anger—And lives lost. Retrieved from The Daily Star: https://www.thedailystar.net/opinion/little-matters/news/shame-guilt-anger-and-lives-lost-1670914

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudgens, L. H. (2019). Why cheating hurts students now and in the their future. Grown and Flown. URL https://grownandflown.com/cheating-hurts-students-now-and-future/

  • ICAI. (2019). Statistics. Retrieved from International Centre for Academic Integrity: https://academicintegrity.org/statistics/

  • Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. (2006). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112(6), 1231–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Z. R. (2014). Developing a factor-model to understand the impact of factors on higher education students’ likelihood to e-cheat (pp. 1954–2016). Wollongong: UOW Thesis Collection Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4545/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Z. R. (2019). What category are they anyway? Proposing a new taxonomy for factors that influence students’ likelihood to e-cheat. In Scholarly ethics and publishing breakthroughs in research and practice. Ch 7. Pp 148–175.

  • Khan, Z. R. and Balasubramanian, S. (2012). Students go click, flick and cheat… e-cheating, technologies and more. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics. AABRI.

  • Khan, Z. R., Al Qaimari, G., & Samuel, S. D. (2007). Professionalism and Ethics: Is Education the bridge? In G. L. Turner (Ed.), Information systems and technology Education. Hershey: IMRA International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khomami, N (2017). Plan to crack down on websites selling essays to students announced. Higher Education. The Guardian. URL. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/feb/21/plan-to-crack-down-on-websites-selling-essays-to-students-announced

  • Klepp, K. I., Ndeki, S. S., Leshabari, M. T., Hannan, P. J., & Lyimo, B. A. (1997). AIDS education in Tanzania: Promoting risk reduction among primary school children. American Journal of Public Health, 87(12), 1931–1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. (2016). Contract cheating: The outsourcing of assessed student work. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity. Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, B. (2017). TEQSA to crack down on outsourcing of assignments. Sydney: The Australian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. J. W., Chan, A., & McLoughlin, C. (2006). Students as producers: Second year students’ experiences as podcasters of content for first year undergraduates. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (pp. 832–848). Sydney, NSW: University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, S. M., Okubo, Y., & Reilly, M. F. (2012). A qualitative inquiry into racism, trauma, and coping: Implications for supporting victims of racism. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 43(3), 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, S. (2017). Universities urged to blobk essay-mill sites in plagairism crackdown. The Guardian: Higher Education https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/oct/09/universities-urged-to-block-essay-mill-sites-in-plagiarism-crackdown.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Bowers, W. J. (1994). Academic dishonesty among male college students: a thirty year perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 35(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., & Katz, D. (2009). Curbing cheating. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 75(1), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, B., & Whistler, J. S. (1997). The Learner-Centered Classroom and School: strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neil, A. L., & Christensen, H. (2009). Efficacy and effectiveness of school-based prevention and early intervention programs for anxiety. Clinical psychology review, 29(3), 208–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, M., Maddahian, E., & Bentler, P. (1986). Risk factors for drug use among adolescents: concurrent and longitudinal analyses. American Journal of Public Health, 76(5), 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Arrmnstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, N. C., Vogl, L. E., Teesson, M., & Andrews, G. (2009). CLIMATE Schools: Alcohol. module: Cross-validation of a school-based prevention programme for alcohol misuse. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(3), 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr Jr., J. (2018). Developing a campus academic integrity education seminar. Journal of Academic Ethics, 16(3), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. (2019). Academic integrity: An interview with Tracey Bretag. Educational Philosophy and Theory., 51(8), 751–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D., Burton, M., Balcombe, K., Bateman, I., & Mulatu, A. (2015). Contract cheating and the market in essays. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 23–37.

  • Rogerson, A. (2018). Detecting contract cheating in essay and report submissions: process, patterns, clues and conversations. In International Journal for Educational Integrity 13(10). Open: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, J. (2017). The impact of public health awareness campaigns on the awareness and quality of palliative care. Journal of Palliative Medicine. [online] Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5733664/ .

  • Simkin, M. G., & McLeod, A. (2010). Why do college students cheat? Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. and Remenyi, D. (2015). Plagiarism and ghostwriting: The rise in academic misconduct. South African Journal of Science. 112 (5/6) Art. #2015-0300. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150300

  • Stewart, S., Loughlin, H., & Rhyno, E. (2001). Internal drinking motives mediate personality domain — drinking relations in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(2), 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, W. (1997). Introduction to case study. The Qualitative Report, 3(2).

  • UOW. (2019). What is academic misconduct. Retrieved from UOW: https://www.uow.edu.au/about/governance/academic-integrity/students/misconduct/

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. J., & Newton, P. M. (2014). Turnaround time and market capacity in contract cheating. Educ. Stud., 40, 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2014.889597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wowra, S. A. (2007). Moral identities, social anxiety, and academic dishonesty among American college students. Ethics & Behavior, 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H. (2018). Why college students cheat: A conceptual model of five factors. Review of Higher Education, 41(4), 549–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zauzmer, J. M (2011). Low response to cheating survey. Harvard Crimson. URL https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2011/10/20/cheating-survey-low-response/

  • ZN. (2013). Changing the world with a click? Online activism and social marketing. Sigital Development. ZN Consulting. URL: https://znconsulting.com/articles/changing-the-world-with-a-click-online-activism-social-marketing/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wollongong in Dubai, PO Box 20183, Dubai, UAE

    Zeenath Reza Khan, Priyanka Hemnani, Sanjana Raheja & Jefin Joshy

Authors
  1. Zeenath Reza Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Priyanka Hemnani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanjana Raheja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jefin Joshy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zeenath Reza Khan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khan, Z.R., Hemnani, P., Raheja, S. et al. Raising Awareness on Contract Cheating –Lessons Learned from Running Campus-Wide Campaigns. J Acad Ethics 18, 17–33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09353-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09353-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation