Abstract
Academic misconduct is widespread in all cultures, and factors that influence it have been investigated for many years. An act of reporting peers’ misconduct not only identifies and prevents misconduct, but also encourages a student to think and act morally and raises awareness about academic integrity. The aim of this study was to determine factors that prevent students from reporting academic misconduct. A questionnaire to assess views on reporting the academic misconduct of a colleague was developed and sent to all students enrolled at the University of Rijeka, Croatia. Results indicate that a tendency to protect fellow student and to comply with other opinions is the most influential factor that prevents students from reporting peers’ misbehavior. Furthermore, scientific discipline, gender, and age are all significant factors in students’ intention to report peer misconduct. Understanding the factors that influence students’ willingness to report academic misconduct enables faculties, administrators and students to strengthen the ethical culture in the academic community.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdulghani, H. M., Haque, S., Almusalam, Y. A., Alanezi, S. L., Alsulaiman, Y. A., Irshad, M., & Khamis, N. (2018). Self-reported cheating among medical students: An alarming finding in a cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE, 13(3), e0194963.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.
Bernardi, R. A., Larkin, M. B., LaBontee, L. A., Lapierre, R. A., & Morse, N. C. (2012). Classroom cheating: Reasons not to whistle-blow and the probability of whistle-blowing. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 16, 201–231.
Birks, M., Smithson, J., Antney, J., Zhao, L., & Burkot, C. (2018). Exploring the paradox: A cross-sectional study of academic dishonesty among Australian nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 65, 96–101.
Box, G. E. P., & Tidwell, P. W. (1962). Transformation of the independent variables. Technometrics, 4, 531–550.
Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty - prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.
Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1999). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 343–353.
Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 255–279.
Hrabak, M., Vujaklija, A., Vodopivec, I., Hren, D., Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2004). Academic misconduct among medical students in a post-communist country. Medical Education, 38, 276–285.
Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. London: Sage Publication.
Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 381–394.
Lawson, R. A. (2015). Business students’ willingness to engage in academic dishonesty and whistle-blowing. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 9, 1–19.
Lim, V. K. G., & See, S. K. B. (2001). Attitudes toward, and intentions to report, academic cheating among students in Singapore. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 261–274.
Lonsdale, D. J. (2017). Intentions to cheat: Ajzen’s planned behavior and goal-related personality facets. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 151(2), 113–129.
Ludlum, M., Hongell, L., Tigerstedt, C., & Teeman, J. (2017). Academic ethics: A pilot study on the attitudes of Finnish students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(4), 307–320.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty - honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.
McCabe, D., Trevino, L., & Butterfield, K. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.
McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378.
McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.
Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2006). Factors influencing engineering students’ decisions to cheat by type of assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 643–684.
Petrak, O., & Bartolac, A. (2014). Academic honesty amongst the students of health studies. Croatian Journal of Education, 16(1), 81–117.
Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Mavrinac, M., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Attitudes toward plagiarism among pharmacy and medical biochemistry students - cross-sectional survey study. Biochemia Medica, 20(3), 279–281.
Rennie, S. C., & Crosby, J. R. (2002). Students’ perceptions of whistle blowing: Implications for self-regulation: Discovery service for University of Alberta libraries. Medical Education, 36(2), 173–179.
Simon, C. A., Carr, J. R., McCullough, S. M., Morgan, S. J., Oleson, T., & Ressel, M. (2004). Gender, student perceptions, institutional commitments and academic dishonesty: Who reports in academic dishonesty cases? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 75–90.
Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 35–45.
Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., Kluemper, D., & Jawahar, I. M. (2012). Whistle-blowing in the classroom. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 12(5), 11–26.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Essex: Pearson.
Taradi, S. K., Taradi, M., & Dogaš, Z. (2012). Croatian medical students see academic dishonesty as an acceptable behaviour: A cross-sectional multicampus study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(6), 376–379.
Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.
Yang, S. C., Huang, C. L., & Chen, A. S. (2013). An investigation of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty, reasons for dishonesty, achievement goals, and willingness to report dishonest behavior. Ethics and Behavior, 23(6), 501–522.
Yu, H., Glanzer, P. L., Sriram, R., Johnson, B., & Moore, B. (2016). What contributes to college students’ cheating? A study of individual factors. Ethics and Behavior, 27(5), 1–22.
Yu, H., Glanzer, P. L., Johnson, B. R., Sriram, R., & Moore, B. (2018). Why college students cheat: A conceptual model of five factors. Review of Higher Education, 41(4), 549–576.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 16.7 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pupovac, V., Popović, S. & Blažina, V. What Prevents Students from Reporting Academic Misconduct? A Survey of Croatian Students. J Acad Ethics 17, 389–400 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09341-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09341-5