Skip to main content

What Prevents Students from Reporting Academic Misconduct? A Survey of Croatian Students

Journal of Academic Ethics volume 17, pages 389–400 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Academic misconduct is widespread in all cultures, and factors that influence it have been investigated for many years. An act of reporting peers’ misconduct not only identifies and prevents misconduct, but also encourages a student to think and act morally and raises awareness about academic integrity. The aim of this study was to determine factors that prevent students from reporting academic misconduct. A questionnaire to assess views on reporting the academic misconduct of a colleague was developed and sent to all students enrolled at the University of Rijeka, Croatia. Results indicate that a tendency to protect fellow student and to comply with other opinions is the most influential factor that prevents students from reporting peers’ misbehavior. Furthermore, scientific discipline, gender, and age are all significant factors in students’ intention to report peer misconduct. Understanding the factors that influence students’ willingness to report academic misconduct enables faculties, administrators and students to strengthen the ethical culture in the academic community.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Abdulghani, H. M., Haque, S., Almusalam, Y. A., Alanezi, S. L., Alsulaiman, Y. A., Irshad, M., & Khamis, N. (2018). Self-reported cheating among medical students: An alarming finding in a cross-sectional study from Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE, 13(3), e0194963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, R. A., Larkin, M. B., LaBontee, L. A., Lapierre, R. A., & Morse, N. C. (2012). Classroom cheating: Reasons not to whistle-blow and the probability of whistle-blowing. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 16, 201–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks, M., Smithson, J., Antney, J., Zhao, L., & Burkot, C. (2018). Exploring the paradox: A cross-sectional study of academic dishonesty among Australian nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 65, 96–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Tidwell, P. W. (1962). Transformation of the independent variables. Technometrics, 4, 531–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty - prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1999). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrabak, M., Vujaklija, A., Vodopivec, I., Hren, D., Marusic, M., & Marusic, A. (2004). Academic misconduct among medical students in a post-communist country. Medical Education, 38, 276–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. London: Sage Publication.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, R. A. (2015). Business students’ willingness to engage in academic dishonesty and whistle-blowing. Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting, 9, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, V. K. G., & See, S. K. B. (2001). Attitudes toward, and intentions to report, academic cheating among students in Singapore. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsdale, D. J. (2017). Intentions to cheat: Ajzen’s planned behavior and goal-related personality facets. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 151(2), 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludlum, M., Hongell, L., Tigerstedt, C., & Teeman, J. (2017). Academic ethics: A pilot study on the attitudes of Finnish students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(4), 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty - honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., Trevino, L., & Butterfield, K. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: A replication and extension to modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(3), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passow, H. J., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2006). Factors influencing engineering students’ decisions to cheat by type of assessment. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 643–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrak, O., & Bartolac, A. (2014). Academic honesty amongst the students of health studies. Croatian Journal of Education, 16(1), 81–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Mavrinac, M., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Attitudes toward plagiarism among pharmacy and medical biochemistry students - cross-sectional survey study. Biochemia Medica, 20(3), 279–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, S. C., & Crosby, J. R. (2002). Students’ perceptions of whistle blowing: Implications for self-regulation: Discovery service for University of Alberta libraries. Medical Education, 36(2), 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, C. A., Carr, J. R., McCullough, S. M., Morgan, S. J., Oleson, T., & Ressel, M. (2004). Gender, student perceptions, institutional commitments and academic dishonesty: Who reports in academic dishonesty cases? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., Kluemper, D., & Jawahar, I. M. (2012). Whistle-blowing in the classroom. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 12(5), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Essex: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taradi, S. K., Taradi, M., & Dogaš, Z. (2012). Croatian medical students see academic dishonesty as an acceptable behaviour: A cross-sectional multicampus study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(6), 376–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S. C., Huang, C. L., & Chen, A. S. (2013). An investigation of college students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty, reasons for dishonesty, achievement goals, and willingness to report dishonest behavior. Ethics and Behavior, 23(6), 501–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H., Glanzer, P. L., Sriram, R., Johnson, B., & Moore, B. (2016). What contributes to college students’ cheating? A study of individual factors. Ethics and Behavior, 27(5), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, H., Glanzer, P. L., Johnson, B. R., Sriram, R., & Moore, B. (2018). Why college students cheat: A conceptual model of five factors. Review of Higher Education, 41(4), 549–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Sciences and Medical Humanities, University of Rijeka, Brace Branchetta 20, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia

    Vanja Pupovac & Stjepka Popović

  2. Faculty of Health Studies, Department of Public Health, University of Rijeka, Viktora Cara Emina 5, 51 000, Rijeka, Croatia

    Stjepka Popović

  3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Brace Branchetta 20, 51000, Rijeka, Croatia

    Vedran Blažina

Authors
  1. Vanja Pupovac
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stjepka Popović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vedran Blažina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanja Pupovac.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 16.7 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pupovac, V., Popović, S. & Blažina, V. What Prevents Students from Reporting Academic Misconduct? A Survey of Croatian Students. J Acad Ethics 17, 389–400 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09341-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09341-5

Keywords

  • Academic misconduct
  • Academic integrity
  • Academic dishonesty
  • Reporting academic misconduct