Consensual sexual relationships (CSR) between faculty and students at universities are a growing issue for administrators. Often times, administrators view these relationships as potential sexual harassment cases given the power disparities that often exist between the parties involved. Therefore, many universities have written policies essentially equating CSRs to sexual harassment. Despite the recent growth of these policies, how faculty compare CSRs and sexual harassment is often overlooked, particularly as it relates to perceived power differentials. The current study examined responses from 166 faculty members to explore these perceptions. Results indicate faculty had varying opinions, depending on previous experience with CSRs and beliefs around power differentials. These findings contribute to previous literature which indicates there is rampant ambiguity and subjectivity when defining and handling CSRs on campus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
In accordance with faculty demographics of the university studied, our sample seems to closely represent the demographic characteristics of our faculty.
Since the survey did contain possibly identifying information such as the respondent’s department and demographic information, anonymity could not be guaranteed, hence the guarantee of confidentiality.
This item was reverse coded for the scale.
Abramson, P. R. (2007). Romance in the ivory tower the rights and liberty of conscience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bass, C. (2010). University bans faculty-student sex. Yale Alumni Magazine. Retrieved from https://yalealumnimagazine.com/articles/2740-university-bans-faculty-student-sex
Bellas, M. L., & Gossett, J. L. (2001). Love or the “lecherous professor”: CSRs between professors and students. The Sociological Quarterly, 42(4), 529–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2001.tb01779.x.
Bowman, V. E., Hatley, L. D., & Bowman, R. L. (1995). Faculty-student relationships: the dual role controversy. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34(3), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1995.tb00245.x.
Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S. H., Townsend, R., Lee, H., Thomas, G., & Westat, I. (2015). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct: Association of American Universities Washington, DC.
Carlson, R. R. (2001). Romantic relationships between professors and their students: morality, ethics and law. South Texas Law Review, 42, 493. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2017.1293922.
Chory, R. M., & Offstein, E. H. (2017). “Your professor will know you as a person” evaluating and rethinking the relational boundaries between faculty and students. Journal of Management Education, 41(1), 9–38.
Chory, R. M., & Offstein, E. H. (2018). Too close for comfort? Faculty–student multiple relationships and their impact on student classroom conduct. Ethics & Behavior, 28(1), 23–44.
Commission, E. E. O. (2016). EEOC Regulations. Retrieved from http://eeoc.gov
Cortina, L. M., Swan, S., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Waldo, C. (1998). Sexual harassment and assault: Chilling the climate for women in academia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22(3), 419–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00166.x.
Dank, B. M. (2008). Out of the campus closet: student professor CSRs. Sexuality and Culture, 12(3), 192–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-007-9016-4.
DeChiara, P. (1987). The need for universities to have rules on CSRs between faculty members and students. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 21, 137 Retrieved from http://jlsp.law.columbia.edu/.
Ei, S., & Bowen, A. (2002). College students' perceptions of student-instructor relationships. Ethics & Behavior, 12(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1202_5.
Fischer, R. J. (1993). Social Desirability Bias and the Validity of Indirect Questioning. Journal of Consumer Reserach, Inc., 20, 303–315.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(88)90012-7.
Flaherty, C. (2018). “Relationship Restrictions.” Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/05/24/academe-sees-new-wave-faculty-student-relationship-restrictions-era-me-too
Fleming, M. B., Cooley, A. H., & McFadden-Wade, G. (2009). Morals clauses for educators in secondary and postsecondary schools: legal applications and constitutional concerns. BYU Educ. & LJ, 67. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/elj/
Gerdes, C. (2003). The case for university consensual relationship policies. Wayne Law Review, 49, 1031 Retrieved from: http://waynelawreview.org/.
Hensley, C., Tallichet, S. E., & Dutkiewicz, E. L. (2012). Exploring the age of onset and recurrence of childhood animal cruelty: can animal cruelty be learned from witnessing others commit it? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(4), 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X11405480.
Hill, C., & Silva, E. (2005). Drawing the Line: Sexual Harassment on Campus. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489850.pdf
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression. Hoboken: Wiley.
Huerta, M., Cortina, L. M., Pang, J. S., Torges, C. M., & Magley, V. J. (2006). Sex and power in the academy: modeling sexual harassment in the lives of college women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(5), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284281.
Hutchens, N. (2003). The legal effect of college and university policies prohibiting romantic relationships between students and professors. Journal of Law & Education, 32, 411 Retrieved from: http://www.law.sc.edu/jled/.
Jafar, A. (2003). Consent or coercion? Sexual relationships between college faculty and students. Gender Issues, 21(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-003-0021-0.
Kays, K., Gathercoal, K., & Buhrow, W. (2012). Does survey format influence self-disclosure on sensitive question items? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 251–256.
Keller, E. A. (1988). Consensual amorous relationships between faculty and students: The constitutional right to privacy. JC & UL, 15, 21 Retrieved from: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1124&context=lsfp.
Little, D., & Thompson, J. A. (1989). Campus policies, the law and sexual relationships. Thought and Action, 5(1), 17–24 Retrieved from: http://www.nea.org/home/1821.htm.
Mack, M. H. (1999). Regulating sexual relationships between faculty and students. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 6, 79 Retrieved from: https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1141&context=mjgl.
Mavletova, A., & Couper, M. P. (2013). Sensitive topics in PC web and mobile web surveys: is there a difference? In Survey Research Methods, 7(3), 191–205.
Office of Policy & Efficieny (2018). “Conflict of interest in cases of amorous relationships.” Retreived from: https://www.cu.edu/ope/aps/5015
Paludi, M. A. (1996). Sexual harassment on college campuses: Abusing the ivory power. New York: SUNY Press.
Quatrella, L. A., & Wentworth, D. K. (1995). Students' perceptions of unequal status dating relationships in academia. Ethics & Behavior, 5(3), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb0503_4.
Rhode, D. L. (2006). The Professional Ethics of Professors. Journal of Legal Education, 56(1), 70–85 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42893957.
Richards, T. N., Crittenden, C., Garland, T. S., & McGuffee, K. (2014). An exploration of policies governing faculty-to-student CSRs on university campuses: current strategies and future directions. Journal of College Student Development, 55(4), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2014.0043.
Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: the convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61(3), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00283.x.
Secunda, P. M. (2004). Getting to the nexus of the matter: a sliding scale approach to faculty-student consensual relationship policies in higher education. Syracuse Law Review, 55, 55 Retrieved from: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1618&context=facpub.
Secunda, P. M. (2005). Lawrence's Quintessential Millian moment and its impact on the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. Villanova Law Review, 50, 117 Retrieved from: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1569&context=facpub.
Stanford. (2019). “Guidelines on Consensual Relationships” Retreived from: https://harass.stanford.edu/be-informed/guidelines-consensual-relationships
Stites, M. C. (1993). What's Wrong with Faculty-Student Consensual Sexual Relationsips? In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Sexual harrassment on college campuses: Abusing the ivory power. New York: SUNY Press.
Stokes, J. W., & Vinik, D. F. (1994). Consensual sexual relations between faculty and students in higher education. West's Education Law Quarterly, 4(2), 334–348.
Sullivan, E. (2004). Perceptions of Consensual Amorous Relationship Policies (CARPs). Journal of College and Character, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-1639.1395.
Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press.
Young, S. (1995). Getting to yes: The case against banning consensual relationships in higher education. American Journal of Gender & the Law, 4, 269 Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/jgspl/vol4/iss2/1/.
Zakrzewski, R. F. (2006). A national survey of American Psychological Association student affiliates' involvement and ethical training in psychology educator-student sexual relationships. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(6), 724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.37.6.724.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Carrillo, A., Crittenden, C. & Garland, T. Faculty Perceptions of Consensual Sexual Relationships Between University Faculty and Students. J Acad Ethics 17, 331–343 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09337-1
- Consensual sexual relationship
- Dual role relationship
- Faculty and student sexual relationship
- Faculty ethics