Appelbaum, P. S. (2007). Clinical practice. Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(18), 1834–1840. http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMcp074045. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
Article
Google Scholar
Braunack-Mayer, A. J. (2001). Should medical students act as surrogate patients for each other? Medical Education, 35(7), 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00970.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Carlsen, B., & Glenton, C. (2011). What amout N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMJ Medical Research Methodology, 11, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-26.
Article
Google Scholar
Chang, E. H., & Power, V. (2000). Are medical students comfortable with practising physical examinations on each other? Academic Medicine, 75(4), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200004000-00020.
Article
Google Scholar
Chen, J. Y., Yip, A. L., Lam, C. L., & Patil, N. G. (2011). Does medical student willingness to practise peer physical examination translate into action? Medical Teacher, 33(10), e528–e540. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.599893.
Article
Google Scholar
Chinnah, T. I., De Bere, S. R., & Collett, T. (2011). Students' views on the impact of peer physical examination and palpation as a pedagogic tool for teaching and learning living human anatomy. Medical Teacher, 33(1), e27–e36. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.530313.
Article
Google Scholar
Delany, C., & Frawley, H. (2011). We need a new model for obtaining students' consent to conduct peer physical examinations. Academic Medicine, 86(5), 539. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318212eb2c.
Article
Google Scholar
Delany, C., & Frawley, H. (2012). A process of informed consent for student learning through peer physical examination in pelvic floor physiotherapy practice. Physiotherapy, 98(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2011.04.347.
Article
Google Scholar
Duvivier, R. J., van Geel, K., van Dalen, J., Scherpbier, A. J., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2012). Learning physical examination skills outside timetabled training sessions: what happens and why? Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 17(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-011-9312-5.
Article
Google Scholar
Finch, H., & Lewis, J. (2003). Focus groups. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 170–198). London: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
Frank, J. R., & Danoff, D. (2007). The CanMEDS initiative: Implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 642–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701746983.
Article
Google Scholar
Gibson, L. M. (2009). Students' concerns about examining their peers. The Clinical Teacher, 6(3), 205–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2009.00306.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Gillon, R. (1994). Medical ethics: four principles plus attention to scope. British Medical Journal, 309(6948), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6948.184.
Article
Google Scholar
Gillon, R. (2003). Ethics needs principles – four can encompass the rest – and respect for autonomy should be "first among equals". Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(5), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.5.307.
Article
Google Scholar
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903.
Article
Google Scholar
Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How many focus groups are enough? Building and evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X16639015.
Article
Google Scholar
Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA). (2008). Guidelines for good practice in the health care professions seeking patients' informed consent: the ethical considerations. Pretoria: HPCSA. http://www.hpcsa.co.za/Uploads/editor/UserFiles/downloads/conduct_ethics/rules/generic_ethical_rules/booklet_9_informed_consent.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2018.
Google Scholar
Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA). (2014). Core competencies for undergraduate students in clinical associate, dentistry and medical teaching and learning programmes in South Africa. Pretoria: HPCSA. http://www.hpcsa.co.za/uploads/editor/UserFiles/downloads/medical_dental/MDB%20Core%20Competencies%20-%20ENGLISH%20-%20FINAL%202014.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
Google Scholar
Hendry, G. J. (2013). Barriers to undergraduate peer-physical examination of the lower limb in the health sciences and strategies to improve inclusion: a review. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9418-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Irby, D. M., & Hamstra, S. J. (2016). Parting the clouds: three professionalism frameworks in medical education. Academic Medicine, 91(12), 1606–1611. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001190.
Article
Google Scholar
Koehler, N., Currey, J., & McMenamin, C. (2014). What should be included in a peer physical examination policy and procedure? Medical Science Education, 24(4), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-014-0068-4.
Article
Google Scholar
Krueger, R. A. (2002). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/.../krueger-focusgroupinterviews.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
Main, C. J., Buchbinder, R., Porcheret, M., & Foster, N. (2010). Addressing patient beliefs and expectations in the consultation. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology, 24(2), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2009.12.013.
Article
Google Scholar
O'Neill, P. A., Larcombe, C., Duffy, K., & Dorman, T. L. (1998). Medical students' willingness and reactions to learning basic skills through examining fellow students. Medical Teacher, 20(5), 433–437. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01421599880526. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
Outram, S., & Nair, B. R. (2008). Peer physical examination: Time to revisit? Medical Journal of Australia, 189(5), 274–276. https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2008/189/5/peer-physical-examination-time-revisit. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
Pounds, G. (2010). Empathy as 'appraisal': a new language-based approach to the exploration of clinical empathy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 7(2), 139–162. https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/JALPP/article/view/10128. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
Article
Google Scholar
Power, D. V. (2011). In reply to Delany, C., & Frawley, H. We need a new model for obtaining students' consent to conduct peer physical examinations. Academic Medicine, 86(5), 539. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318213e5d9.
Article
Google Scholar
Power, D. V., & Center, B. A. (2005). Examining the medical student body: peer physical examinations and genital, rectal, or breast exams. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17(4), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328015tlm1704_5.
Article
Google Scholar
Rees, C. E., Bradley, P., & McLachlan, J. C. (2004). Exploring medical students' attitudes towards peer physical examination. Medical Teacher, 26(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590310001642984.
Article
Google Scholar
Rees, C. E., Bradley, P., Collett, T., & McLachlan, J. C. (2005). "Over my dead body?": the influence of demographics on students' willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Medical Teacher, 27(7), 599–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500237671.
Article
Google Scholar
Rees, C. E., Wearn, A. M., Vnuk, A. K., & Bradley, P. A. (2009). Don't want to show fellow students my naughty bits: Medical students' anxieties about peer examination of intimate body regions at six schools across UK, Australasia and Far-East Asia. Medical Teacher, 31(10), 921–927. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590802578244.
Article
Google Scholar
Reid, K. J., Kgakololo, M., Sutherland, R. M., Elliott, S. L., & Dodds, A. E. (2012). First-year medical students' willingness to participate in peer physical examination. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 24(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2012.641489.
Article
Google Scholar
Rudland, J. R. (2009). Learning in small groups. In J. A. Dent & R. M. Harden (Eds.), A practical guide for medical teachers (3rd ed., pp. 80–85). London: Elsevier.
Google Scholar
Tang, K. C., & Davis, A. (1995). Critical factors in the determination of focus group size. Family Practice, 12(4), 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/12.4.474.
Article
Google Scholar
Uchida, T., Achike, F. I., Blood, A. D., Boyle, M., Farnan, J. M., Gowda, D., Hojsak, J., Ovitsh, R. K., Park, Y. S., & Silvestri, R. (2018). Resources used to teach the physical exam to preclerkship medical students: results of a national survey. Academic Medicine, 93(5), 736–741. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002051.
Article
Google Scholar
University of Queensland, Australia. (2019). Clinical skills program and peer physical examination policy document. https://medicine-program.uq.edu.au/files/612/clinical_skills_program_and_peer_physical_examination_policy_2014.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
Vnuk, A. K., Wearn, A., & Rees, C. E. (2017). The influence of students' gender on equity in peer physical examination: a qualitative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 22(3), 653–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9699-0.
Article
Google Scholar
Wearn, A., & Bhoopatkar, H. (2006). Evaluation of consent for peer physical examination: students reflect on their clinical skills learning experience. Medical Education, 40(10), 957–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02557.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Wearn, A. M., Rees, C. E., Bradley, P., & Vnuk, A. K. (2008). Understanding student concerns about peer physical examination using an activity theory framework. Medical Education, 42(12), 1218–1226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03175.x.
Article
Google Scholar
Wearn, A. M., Bhoopatkar, H., Mathew, T. K., & Stewart, L. (2013). Exploration of the attitudes of nursing students to peer physical examination and physical examination of patients. Nurse Education Today, 33(8), 884–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.08.012.
Article
Google Scholar