Although the advising literature has emphasized the importance of good academic advising, there has been little emphasis on ethical issues. NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising provides Core Values to guide ethical behavior. This study used an experimental design to examine perspectives of ethical behavior among faculty, staff, and students. All groups could differentiate between ethical and unethical extremes, but students had difficulty differentiating between ethical and neutral behavior. All groups hesitated to rate advisors as highly ethical or unethical. Even when behavior was seen as less ethical, students and faculty/staff perceived limited opportunity for students to do something about that behavior, such as change advisors. Suggestions are offered to increase the likelihood of more ethical behavior within advisement.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Allen, J. M., & Smith, C. L. (2008). Importance of, responsibility for, and satisfaction with academic advising: A faculty perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 49, 397–411.
American Medical Association. (2016). Opinion 1.1.1 – patient-physician relationships. Retrieved June 5, 2019, from https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/ama-assn.org/files/corp/media-browser/code-of-medical-ethics-chapter-1.pdf.
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved June 5, 2019, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.
Annas, G. J. (2018). Beyond Nazi war crimes experiments: The voluntary consent requirement of the Nuremberg code at 70. American Journal of Public Health, 2018, 42–46.
Archambault, K. L. (2015). Developing self-knowledge as a first step toward cultural competence. In P. Folsom, F. Yoder, & J. E. Joslin (Eds.), The new advisor guidebook: Mastering the art of academic advising (pp. 185–201). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bloswick, A., & Skowron, H. A. (2017). Length and format of informed consent forms in clinical trials in different patient populations (pediatric, adult, elderly) based on samples from Poland. Ethics and Medicine: An International Journal of Bioethics, 44, 97–105.
Chaiklin, H. (2011). Attitudes, behavior, and social practice. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 38, 31–54.
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment (9th ed.). Columbus: McGraw-Hill.
Compton, E. (2014). Doing the right thing: Integrity in advising. Retrieved June 5, 2019, from https://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-Today/View-Articles/Doing-the-Right-Thing-Integrity-in-Advising.aspx.
Council for the Advancement of Standards. (2006). CAS professional standards for higher education (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Damminger, J. K. (2015). Ethical issues in advising. In P. Folsom, F. Yoder, & J. E. Joslin (Eds.), The new advisor guidebook: Mastering the art of academic advising (pp. 55–66). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Donaldson, P., McKinney, L., Lee, M., & Pino, D. (2016). First-year community college students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward intrusive academic advising. NACADA Journal, 36, 30–40.
Ellis, K. C. (2014). Academic advising experiences of first-year undecided students: A qualitative study. NACADA Journal, 34(2), 42–50.
Farling, M. L., & Winston, B. E. (2001). A replication study: “Attitudes toward ethics: A view of the college student”. Teaching Business Ethics, 5, 251–266.
Fisher, C. B. (2003). Developing a code of ethics for academics: Commentary on ‘ethics for all: Differences across scientific society codes. ’ Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 171–179.
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracin, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 778–822.
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. New York: Paulist Press.
Hastings, A., Stockley, D., Kinderman, L., & Egan, R. (2016). Graduate student research in the classroom-understanding the role of research ethics. College Student Journal, 50, 361–368.
Hutson, B. (2013). Faculty development to support academic advising: Rationale, components, and strategies of support. Journal of Faculty Development, 27(3), 5–11.
King, M. C. (2000). Designing effective training for academic advisors. In V. G. Gordon & W. R. Habley (Eds.), Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook (pp. 289–297). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Löfström, E., Trotman, T., Furnari, M., & Shephard, K. (2015). Who teaches academic integrity and how do they teach it? Higher Education, 69, 435–448.
Lowenstein, M. (2008). Ethical foundations of academic advising. In V. N. Gordon, W. R. Habley, & T. J. Grites (Eds.), Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook (2nd ed., pp. 36–49). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lutz, D. J., Boon, A. T., & Xue, X. (2016). Resolving ethical dilemmas in academic advising through core values and aspirational principles. The Mentor: An Academic Advising Journal Retrieved from https://dus.psu.edu/mentor.
McClellan, J. L. (2007). The advisor as servant: The theoretical and philosophical relevance of servant leadership to academic advising. NACADA Journal, 27(2), 41–49.
NACADA (2005). NACADA statement of core values of academic advising. Retrieved October 8, 2016, from http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Clearinghouse/View-Articles/Core-values-of-academic-advising.aspx.
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising. (2017). NACADA core values of academic advising. Retrieved June 5, 2019, from https://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Pillars/CoreValues.aspx.
NACADA: The Global Community for Academic Advising. (2018). Academic advising resources. Retrieved June 5, 2019, from https://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Clearinghouse/View-Articles/Advising-Syllabi-Resource-Links.aspx.
National Association of Social Workers. (2017). Code of ethics of the national association of social workers. Retrieved June 5, 2019, from https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics.
Oulton, K., Gibson, F., Sell, D., Williams, A., Pratt, L., & Wray, J. (2016). Assent for children’s participation in research: Why it matters and making it meaningful. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 42, 588–597.
Paul, W. K., Smith, K. C., & Dochney, B. J. (2012). Advising as servant leadership: Investigating the relationship. NACADA Journal, 32, 53–62.
Puroway, A. W. (2016). Critical advising: A Freiran-inspired approach. NACADA Journal, 36(2), 4–10.
Robbins, R. (2012). Everything you have always wanted to know about academic advising (well, almost). Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 26, 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568225.2012.685855.
Rust, M. M. (2015). Legal issues in academic advising. In P. Folsom, F. Yoder, & J. E. Joslin (Eds.), The new advisor guidebook: Mastering the art of academic advising (pp. 159–173). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shaffer, L. S. (2015). Academic advising. In P. J. Hartung, M. L. Savickas, & W. B. Walsh (Eds.), APA handbook of career intervention. Volume 2: Applications (pp. 85–98). Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
Taube, D. O., Scroppo, J., & Zelechoski, A. D. (2018). Nine risk management lessons for practitioners. Practice Innovations, 3, 271–283.
Vianden, J. (2016). Ties that bind: Academic advisors as agents of student relationship management. NACADA Journal, 36(1), 19–29.
Virta, C. (2016). Student support services advising syllabus. In D. R. Arendale (Ed.), 2016 EOA National Best Practices Center Directory (pp. 141–150) Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED574859).
Workman, J. L. (2015). Exploratory students’ experiences with first-year academic advising. NACADA Journal, 35(1), 5–12.
Yearby, R. A. (2016). Involuntary consent: Conditioning access to health care on participation in clinical trials. The Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics, 44, 445–461.
The authors would like to thank Rachelle Darabi and Wayne Mitchell for their comments on previous drafts of this manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Kohlfeld, X.X., Lutz, D.J. & Boon, A.T. Ethicality of Advisor Motives in Academic Advising: Faculty, Staff, and Student Perspectives. J Acad Ethics 18, 333–346 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09330-8
- Faculty perspectives
- Student perspectives