Skip to main content

Ethics Education in Franciscan Undergraduate Psychology Programs

Abstract

Ethics education is an important goal in higher education overall. It is not clear how well psychology programs are meeting this goal. The American Psychology Association’s Guidelines for the Undergraduate Psychology Major (APA 2013) were created to support high-quality education in psychology. The Guidelines focus on five goals including Ethical and Social Responsibility in a Diverse World. This study is a review of ethics information available online from Franciscan Colleges and Universities. We accessed 24 Franciscan institutions and reviewed the available information provided by 22 of them. We asked several questions: Whether the psychology department provided a mission statement and was ethics addressed in it? What courses focused on ethics or mentioned ethics in their description? Were there other institutional ethics courses required for psychology majors? Was ethics mentioned in the institution mission? The results of this study indicate a need for more intentional inclusion of ethics in university and program mission statements as well as specific courses for the undergraduate psychology major.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2013). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major: Version 2.0. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/undergrad/index.aspx

  2. Dunn, D. S., Brewer, C. L., Cautin, R. L., Gurung, R. A. R., Keith, K. D., McGregor, L. N., et al. (2010). The undergraduate psychology curriculum: A call for a core. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline (pp. 47–51). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12063-003.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Halpern, D. F. (2010). Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Handelsman, M. M. (1986). Problems with ethics training by "osmosis.". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 17, 371–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Keenan, J. F. (2015). University ethics: How colleges can build and benefit from a culture of ethics. New York: Rowan & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Landrum, R. E., & McCarthy, M. A. (2012). Teaching ethically: Challenges and opportunities. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Meacham, J., & Gaff, J. G. (2006). Learning goals in mission statements: Implications for educational leadership. Liberal Education, 92(1), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Plante, T. G., & Pistoresi, S. (2017). A survey of ethics training in undergraduate psychology programs at Jesuit universities. Pastoral Psychology, 66(3), 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruiz, A., & Warchal, J. (2014). Ethics as an undergraduate psychology outcome: When, where, and how to teach it. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 13(2), 120–128. Retrieved from. https://doi.org/10.2304/plat.2014.13.2.120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Selingo, J. (2017). How colleges use big data to target the students they want. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/04/how-colleges-find-their-students/522516/

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, K. C. (2014). Ethics is not rocket science: How to have ethical discussions in your science class. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 15(2), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. The Association of Franciscan Colleges and Universities (2017). Members. Retrieved from http://franciscancollegesuniversities.org/members/.

  13. Warchal, J., Ruiz, A., & You, D. (2017). Do psychology department mission statements reflect the APA undergraduate learning goals? Psychology Learning and Teaching., 16(3), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717723276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. You, D., Warchal, J., & Ruiz, A. (2011). A review of ethics from project syllabus. Psychology Journal, 8(2), 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  15. You, D., Ruiz, A., & Warchal, J. (2018). The presentation of ethics in undergraduate psychology syllabi. Teaching of Psychology, 45(4), 346–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318796921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Ruiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruiz, A., Warchal, J. & You, D. Ethics Education in Franciscan Undergraduate Psychology Programs. J Acad Ethics 18, 223–227 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09329-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Courses
  • Mission
  • Undergraduate psychology
  • Franciscan education