Skip to main content

Do Birds of a Feather Cheat Together? How Personality and Relationships Affect Student Cheating

Journal of Academic Ethics volume 15, pages 1–22 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Academic misconduct is widespread in schools, colleges, and universities and it appears to be an international phenomenon that also spills over into the workplace (Nonis and Swift 2001; Sims 1993; Stone et al. 2011). To this end, while a great deal of research has investigated various individual components such as, demographic, personality and situational factors that contribute to cheating, research has yet to examine why students help others cheat and which students are being asked to help others cheat. In this study, we investigated if the closeness of the relationship to the individual requesting help in cheating to the individual being asked to help cheat, influenced the decision to help cheat. We also investigated if past cheating behavior predicted how an individual would respond to requests to cheat. Additionally, we sought to answer the following questions; whether minor cheating is more prevalent than serious cheating, what personality factors predict helping others cheat, who is helped, and how people rationalize helping others cheat. Results indicate minor cheating to be more prevalent, prudent personalities are less likely to have cheated or to help others cheat, individuals are more likely to help friends cheat than to help strangers, and past cheating behaviors is indicative of helping others to cheat. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

  1. Our total participants represent all students who participated in the cheating surveys. For serious cheating, those who have been asked to cheat (N = 45) is greater than the value in our regressions (N = 29) due to some students who have been asked, but did not respond to the request.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: from cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, A. M., & Murdock, T. B. (2007). The psychology of academic cheating. In A. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychology of academic cheating. New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2012). The honest truth about dishonesty: how we lie to everyone--especially ourselves. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: a current perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., Vitell, S. J., Ammeter, A. P., Garner, B. L., & Novicevic, M. M. (2012). An experimental investigation of an interactive model of academic cheating among business students. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(1), 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimble, M., & Stevenson-Clarke, P. (2005). Perceptions of the prevalence and seriousness of academic dishonesty in Australian universities. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, B. K., & Near, J. P. (1995). Estimating the incidence of wrongdoing and whistle-blowing: results of a study using randomized response technique. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(1), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, K. J., Davis, R., Toy, D., & Wright, L. (2004). Academic integrity in the business school environment: I’ll get by with a little help from my friends. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen-Hughes, J. M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: a review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, L. G., Blount, K. D., & Ferrell, C. M. (1991). Academic misconduct among teacher education students: a descriptive-correlational study. Research in Higher Education, 32(6), 703–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genereux, R. L., & McLeod, B. A. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: a questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education, 36(6), 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior the effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (1992). Hogan personality inventory. Tulsa: Hogan Assessment Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (2007). Hogan personality inventory manual (3rd ed.). Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96(1), 72–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson Institute of Ethics (2006). The ethics of American youth. Retrieved December 19, 2015, from http://www.josephsoninstitute.org.

  • Josephson Institute of Ethics (2009). The ethics of American youth. Retrieved December 19, 2015, from http://www.josephsoninstitute.org.

  • Josephson Institute of Ethics (2012). The ethics of American youth: 2012. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from https://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/2012/index.html.

  • Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic integrity: the relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, V. K. G., & See, S. K. B. (2001). Attitudes toward, and intentions to report, academic cheating among students in Singapore. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J. R., Polterovich, V. M., Danilov, D. L., & Savvateev, A. V. (2002). Tolerance of cheating: an analysis across countries. Journal of Economic Education, 33(2), 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1992). The influence of situational ethics on cheating among college students. Sociological Inquiry, 62(3), 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2005). Cheating among college and university students: a north American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1).

  • McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Treviño, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: a multi-campus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2002). Honor codes and other contextual influences on academic integrity: a replication and extension of modified honor code settings. Research in Higher Education, 43(3), 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: prevalence, causes and proposed action. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5(3), 294–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2012). Cheating in college: why students do it and what educators can do about it. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya-Smith, S. (2013). Survey: 42 percent of Harvard incoming freshman class cheated on homework. Retrieved January 6, 2014 from http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/ 09/06/20361014-survey-42-percent-of-harvards-incoming-freshman-class-cheated-on-homework?lite.

  • Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: a multi-campus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 77(2), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuss, E. M. (1984). Academic integrity: comparing faculty and student attitudes. Improving College and University Teaching, 32(3), 140–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeder, T. (2014). Air force academy: 40 freshmen in chemistry class cheating probe. The Gazette, http://gazette.com/air-force-academy-11-freshmen-in-cheating-probe/article/1515780.

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, C. A., Carr, J. R., McCullough, S. M., Morgan, S. J., Oleson, T., & Ressel, M. G. (2004). Student perceptions, institutional commitments and academic dishonesty: who reports in academic dishonesty cases? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, L. M., & Davis, J. R. (2004). Perceptions of dishonesty among two-year college students: academic versus business situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(1), 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E., Fox, S., Penney, L. M., Bruursema, K., Goh, A., & Kessler, S. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: are all counterproductive behaviors created equal? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 446–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., & Jawahar, I. M. (2008). Predicting students’ perceptions of academic misconduct on the Hogan personality inventory reliability scale. Psychological Reports, 102(2), 495–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct. Career Development International, 14(3), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2011). Predicting workplace misconduct using personality and academic behaviors. In R. J. Burke, E. C. Tomlinson, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Crime and corruption in organizations – why it occurs and what to do about it. Surrey: Gower Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., Kluemper, D., & Jawahar, I. M. (2012). Whistle-blowing in the classroom. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 12(5), 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, T. H., Kisamore, J. L., Jawahar, I. M., & Bolin, J. H. (2014). Making our measures match perceptions: do severity and type matter when assessing academic misconduct offenses? Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(4), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thau, S., Derfler-Rozin, R., Pitesa, M., Mitchell, M. S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2015). Unethical for the sake of the group: risk of social exclusion and pro-group unethical behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 98–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umphress, E. E., & Bingham, J. B. (2011). When employees do bad things for good reasons: examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organization Science, 22(3), 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umphress, E. E., Bingham, J. B., & Mitchell, M. S. (2010). Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(4), 769–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernimont, P. F., & Campbell, J. P. (1968). Signs, samples and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(5), 372–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley Jr., B. E. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students. Research in Higher Education, 39(3), 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltermuth, S. S., Bennett, V. M., & Pierce, L. (2013). Doing as they would do: how the perceived ethical preferences of third-party beneficiaries impact ethical decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oklahoma State University, 320A Business Building, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA

    Alex J. Scrimpshire

  2. Oklahoma State University, 308 North Hall Tulsa Campus, Tulsa, OK, 74106, USA

    Thomas H. Stone

  3. University of Oklahoma-Tulsa, 4502 E 41st Street-3J22, Tulsa, OK, 74135, USA

    Jennifer L. Kisamore

  4. Office of the Provost, Illinois State University, Campus Box 4000, Normal, IL, 61790-4000, USA

    I.M. Jawahar

Authors
  1. Alex J. Scrimpshire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas H. Stone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer L. Kisamore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I.M. Jawahar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas H. Stone.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 8

Table 8 Scale Content
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

J. Scrimpshire, A., Stone, T.H., Kisamore, J.L. et al. Do Birds of a Feather Cheat Together? How Personality and Relationships Affect Student Cheating. J Acad Ethics 15, 1–22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9267-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9267-5

Keywords

  • Academic integrity
  • Cheating
  • Personality
  • Helping
  • Academic misconduct