Allen, G. (2008). Getting beyond form filling: the role of institutional governance in human research ethics. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 105–116. doi:10.1007/s10805-008-9057-9.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (2010). Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Davey, K. G. (2009). Reflections on my experience in human research ethics. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7, 27–31. doi:10.1007/s10805-009-9088-x.
De Vries, R. G., & Forsberg, C. (2002). What do IRBs look like? what kind of support do they receive? Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 9, 199–216. doi:10.1080/08989620214683.
De Vries, R. G., Anderson, M. S., & Martinson, B. C. (2006). Normal misbehaviour: scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1, 43–50.
Guillemin, M., Gillam, L., Rosenthal, D., & Bolitho, A. (2010). Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5, 21–34. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.21.
Guillemin, M., Gillam, L., Rosenthal, D., & Bolitho, A. (2012). Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and responsibilities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7, 38–49. doi:10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.38.
Hayes, G. J., Hayes, S. C., & Dykstra, T. (1995). A survey of institutional review boards: characteristics, policies, and procedures. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 17, 1–6.
Jennings, S. L. M. (2010). Two models of social science research ethics review. Research Ethics Review, 6, 86–90. doi:10.1177/174701611000600304.
Lidz, C. W., & Gaverich, S. (2013). What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform. The Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 41, 390–396. doi:10.1111/jlme.12050.
Lindorff, M. (2010). Ethics, ethical human research and human research ethics committees. Australian Universities Review, 52, 51–59.
MacNeil, S. D., & Fernandez, C. V. (2006). Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics boards. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32, 49–54.
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. G. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737–738.
Tilley, S. A. (2008). A troubled dance: doing the work of research ethics review. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 91–104. doi:10.1007/s10805-008-9058-8.
Tilley, S. A., Killins, J., & Van Oosten, D. (2005). Connections and tensions between university and school districts: research review boards and school-based research. Alberta Journal of Education, 51, 1–16.