Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 151–166 | Cite as

The Influence of the Internet on Plagiarism Among Doctoral Dissertations: An Empirical Study

Article

Abstract

Plagiarism has been a long standing concern within higher education. Yet with the rapid rise in the use and availability of the Internet, both the research literature and media have raised the notion that the online environment is accelerating the decline in academic ethics. The majority of research that has been conducted to investigate such claims have involved self-report data from students. This study sought to collect empirical data to investigate the potential influence the prevalence of the Internet has had on significant higher education artifacts by comparing dissertations written prior to widespread use of the Internet with those written in a period in ubiquitous Internet use. Due to the prestige associated with the doctoral degree and the fact that the majority of the effort necessary to achieve such a degree resides within the dissertation, this study utilized Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) dissertations written in English and published by accredited universities in the U.S. and Canada. A sample of 384 dissertations were analyzed by Turnitin plagiarism detection software. The mean similarity indices for pre-Internet and post-Internet eras were 14.5 and 12.3 %, respectively. A Mann Whitney U test (Mdn = 13, U = 30,098.5, p < 0.001) indicated that the differences between groups was significant, however opposite than has been purported within the exigent literature. When comparing the counts of dissertations for each time era considering those with plagiarism versus those that had little/no evidence thereof, there was no statistically significant difference (χ2 [1, N = 368] = 2.61, p = 0.11). The findings of this study suggest that the Internet may not be significantly impacting the prevalence of plagiarism in advanced levels of higher education.

Keywords

Plagiarism Academic Integrity Doctoral Doctorate Dissertation Higher education Turnitin Similarity index Empirical Ethics 

References

  1. Allan, G., Callagher, L., Connors, M., Joyce, D., & Rees, M. (2005). Some Australasian perspective on academic integrity in the Internet age. Paper presented at the EDUCAUSE Conference, Auckland, NZ.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, J. (2014). Top plagiarism scandals of 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ithenticate.com/plagiarism-detection-blog/top-plagiarism-scandals-of-2013#.VElCnfnF-sl
  3. Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to fight plagiarism among university students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/13_2/1.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. Berge, Z., & Collins, M. (1994). Publishing and editing an electronic journal on the Internet. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED373701
  5. Borgman, C. (1996). Why are online catalogs still hard to use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 493–503. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199607)47:7<493::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009). A model for determining student plagiarism: electronic detection and academic judgment. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 6(1), 6.Google Scholar
  7. Butakov, S., & Scherbinin, V. (2009). The toolbox for local and global plagiarism detection. Computers & Education, 52(4), 781–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, N. (2013). E-learning–the McDonaldization of education. European Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Psychology Press Taylor Francis Group.Google Scholar
  10. Connell, M., & Mallette, M. (2005). The right of educational institutions to withhold or revoke academic degrees. Paper presented at the 26th Annual National Conference on Law and Higher Education, Oxford, Mississippi.Google Scholar
  11. Daramola, D. (2014). Plagiarism: the undiagnosed Ebola in Nigeria. Leadership [online version]. Retrieved from http://leadership.ng/news/386536/plagiarism-undiagnosed-ebola-nigeria
  12. DeGeeter, M., Harris, K., Kehr, H., Ford, C., Lane, D., Nuzum, D. S., Gibson, W., et al. (2014). Pharmacy students’ ability to identify plagiarism after an educational intervention. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(2), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diehl, J., & Trenkamp, O. (2013). Plagiarism accusations: Merkel’s education minister has Ph.D. title revoked. Spiegel Online International. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/education-minister-schavan-has-ph-d-revoked-in-plagiarism-scandal-a-881707.html
  14. EAGLEsearch. (2014). EAGLEsearch. Retrieved from http://library.erau.edu/home.html
  15. Eaton, L. (2004). A quarter of UK students are guilty of plagiarism, survey shows. BMJ [British Medical Journal], 329(7457), 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckel, E. J. (2011). Textual appropriation in engineering master’s theses: a preliminary study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(3), 469–83. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9214-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elon University. (n.d.). Imagining the Internet’s: Quick look at the early history of the Internet. Retrieved from http://www.elon.edu/e-web/predictions/early90s/internethistory.xhtml
  18. Eret, E., & Ok, A. (2014). Internet plagiarism in higher education: tendencies, triggering factors and reasons among teacher candidates. Assessment & Evaluations in Higher Education, 39(8), 1002–1016. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.880776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Febvre, L., & Martin, H. (1976). The coming of the book: The impact of printing 1450-1800. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  20. Garden, C. (2009). What does my Turnitin report mean? Edinburgh: Edinburgh Napier University.Google Scholar
  21. Garner, H. R. (2011). Combating unethical publications with plagiarism detection services. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 29(1), 95–99. Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. (2003). Plagiarism in academia: trends and implications. Accountability in Research, 10(4), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilmore, J., Strickland, D., Timmerman, B., Maher, M., & Feldon, D. (2010). Weeds in the flower garden: an exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
  24. Glassman, N., Sorensen, K., Habousha, R., Minuti, A., & Schwartz, R. (2011). The plagiarism project. Medical Services Quarterly, 30(4), 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gopalakrishnan, J. (2011). Revocation of 3 German politicians’ Ph.Ds for plagiarism, 3 reactions. Retrieved from http://www.ithenticate.com/plagiarism-detection-blog/bid/60500/Revocation-of-3-German-Politicians-Ph-Ds-For-Plagiarism-3-Reactions#.VElVrfnF-sk
  26. Harirforoosh, S., Bossaer, J. B., Brown, S. D., Pond, B. B., Ramsauer, V. P., & Roane, D. S. (2011). Plagiarism among applicants for faculty positions. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(10), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hart, L., & Morgan, L. (2010). Academic integrity in an online registered nurse to baccalaureate in nursing program. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 41(11), 498–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heckler, N. C., Rice, M., & Bryan, C. H. (2013). Turnitin systems: a deterrent to plagiarism in college classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(3), 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howard, R. M. (2007). Understanding “internet plagiarism”. Computers and Composition, 24(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. iParadigms. (2012). Instructor user manual. Retrieved from http://Turnitin.com/en_us/training/instructor-training/instructor-user-manual
  31. Ison, D. C. (2012). Plagiarism among dissertations: prevalence at online institutions. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(3), 227–236. doi:10.1007/s10805-012-9165-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ison, D. C. (2014). Does the online environment promote plagiarism? A comparative study of dissertations from brick-and-mortar versus online institutions. MERLOT Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 272–282.Google Scholar
  33. Jeffery, D., & Fries, J. (2011). Unauthorized uses of a coauthored work and a doctoral dissertation. Ethics & Behavior, 21(2), 118–126. doi:10.1080/10508422.2011.551469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones International University. (2014). Our history. Retrieved from http://www.jiu.edu/about-jiu/our-history
  35. Jones, I. S., Blankenship, D., & Hollier, G. (2013). Am I cheating? An analysis of online student perceptions of their behaviors and attitudes. Proceedings of the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 21–24.Google Scholar
  36. Kutz, E., Rhodes, W., Sutherland, S., & Zamel, V. (2011). Addressing plagiarism in a digital age. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 9(3), 15–36.Google Scholar
  37. Leingang, M. (2006). Ohio college stung by plagiarism charges. The Washington Post [online version]. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/21/AR2006082100068.html
  38. Li, Y. (2013). Text-based plagiarism in scientific publishing: issues, developments, and education. Science Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1241–1254. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9367-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ma, H., Lu, Y., Turner, S., & Wan, G. (2006). An empirical investigation of digital cheating and plagiarism among middle school students. American Secondary Education, 35(2), 69–82.Google Scholar
  40. Ma, H., Wang, G., & Lu, E. (2008). Digital cheating and plagiarism in schools. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacQueen, H. L., Charlotte, W., & Graeme, L. T. (2007). Contemporary intellectual property law and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mahmud, S., & Bretag, T. (2014). Integrity in postgraduate research: the student voice. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2014, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9616-y.Google Scholar
  43. Martin, D., Rao, A., & Sloan, L. (2011). Ethnicity, acculturation, and plagiarism: a criterion study of unethical academic conduct. Human Organization, 70(1), 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maxymuk, J. (1996). Riding the technology waves in search of electronic access: CD-ROM, gophers, the WWW and beyond. Journal of Government Information, 23(3), 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCabe, D. L. (2009). Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: an empirical investigation. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(11), 614–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCullough, M., & Holmberg, M. (2005). Using the Google search engine to detect word-for word plagiarism in master’s theses: a preliminary study. College Student Journal, 39(3), 435–441.Google Scholar
  47. Moss, S. (2005). A history of plagiarism (not my own work). Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/nov/23/comment.stephenmoss
  48. O’Connor, C. (2012). Top 5 factors to weigh before getting a PhD. Retrieved from http://www.boston.com/business/blogs/global-business-hub/2012/02/the_top_5_facto.html
  49. Perez-Pena, R. (2013). Students disciplined in Harvard scandal. The New York Times [online version]. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/02/education/harvard-forced-dozens-to-leave-in-cheating-scandal.html
  50. Perry, T. T., Perry, L. A., & Hosack-Curlin, K. (1998). Internet use by university students: an interdisciplinary study on three campuses. Internet Research, 8(2), 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pew Research. (2014). Internet project: World Wide Web timeline. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/03/11/world-wide-web-timeline/
  52. Plagiarism. (2014a). Online etymology dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=plagiarism&searchmode=none
  53. Plagiarism. (2014b). Cambridge dictionaries online. Retrieved from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/american-english/plagiarize?q=plagiarism
  54. Postle, K. (2009). Detecting and deterring plagiarism in social work students: implications for learning for practice. Social Work Education, 28(4), 351–362. doi:10.1080/02615470802245926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Powers, E. (2008). ‘Distinguished’ no longer. Inside Higher Ed, 22(2). Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/02/22/ohio
  56. ProQuest. (n.d.). History and milestones. Retrieved from http://www.proquest.com/about/history-milestones/
  57. Pyle, E. (2010). Plagiarism a persistent problem on campuses. The Columbus Dispatch [online version]. Retrieved from http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2010/09/15/plagiarism-a-persistent-problem-on-campuses.html
  58. Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
  59. Research Misconduct – Definitions, 45 C.F.R. § 689.1 (2012).Google Scholar
  60. Rogers, S. (2014). Plagiarism attitudes common across cultures. Yale Daily News [online version]. Retrieved from http://yaledailynews.com/blog/2014/02/11/plagiarism-attitudes-common-across-cultures/
  61. Roig, M. (2010). Plagiarism: An ounce of prevention…. ASQ Higher Education Brief, June. Retrieved from http://rube.asq.org/edu/2010/06/continuous-improvement/plagiarism-an-ounce-of-prevention-.pdf
  62. Roig-Franzia, M. (2014). ‘A fragile trust’ exhibits irresponsibility behind Jason Blair plagiarism scandal. The Washington Post [online version]. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/a-fragile-trust-exhibits-irresponsibility-behind-jayson-blair-plagiarism-scandal/2014/05/05/596aca28-d45d-11e3-95d3-3bcd77cd4e11_story.html
  63. Scanlon, P. M. (2003). Student online plagiarism: how do we respond? College Teaching, 51(4), 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374–385.Google Scholar
  65. Scott, T. J., Kallman, E. A., & Lelewer, D. (1994). Ethical issues involving the Internet. In Proceedings of the conference on Ethics in the computer age (pp. 31–32). ACM.Google Scholar
  66. Sheard, J., & Dick, M. (2011). Computing student practices of cheating and plagiarism: a decade of change. In Proceedings of the 16th annual joint conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 233–237). ACM.Google Scholar
  67. Sikes, P. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft, and collusion in academic research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stricherz, M. (2001). Many teachers ignore cheating, survey finds. Education Week, 20(34), 3.Google Scholar
  69. Stuber-McEwen, D., Wiseley, P., & Hoggatt, S. (2009). Point, click, and cheat: Frequency and type of academic dishonesty in the virtual classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(3).Google Scholar
  70. Tzanakou, C. (2014). The wider benefits of a PhD. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20140409095727966
  71. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2013). Self-plagiarism. Retrieved from http://ori.hhs.gov/plagiarism-13
  72. U.S. News and World Report. (2014). Explore the pros and cons of earning a PhD or doctoral degree. Retrieved from http://www.usnewsuniversitydirectory.com/articles/pros-and-cons-of-earning-a-phd-or-doctoral-degree_12910.aspx#.VGOicvnF-sk
  73. Universitat Dusseldorf. (2013). G*power [computer software]. Available from http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/gpower3
  74. Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang, Y. (2008). University student online plagiarism. International Journal of E-Learning, 7(4), 743–757.Google Scholar
  76. Zu Eissen, S. M., & Stein, B. (2006). Intrinsic plagiarism detection. In Advances in Information Retrieval (pp. 565–569). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of AeronauticsEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical University – WorldwideDaytona BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations