Skip to main content

Academic Dishonesty at Universities: The Case of Plagiarism Among Iranian Language Students

Abstract

This study investigated Iranian language students’ perception of and familiarity with plagiarism, their attitudes toward their professors regarding this issue, and their reasons for doing so. The participants were 122 undergraduate and graduate language students in Translation, Literature, TEFL, and Linguistics who filled out a validated and piloted questionnaire. Overall, the results indicated that students had different views about the definition of plagiarism and plagiarism was mostly perceived by students as using someone else’s words as if they were their own rather than taking someone’s ideas without permission. It was also found that in their academic career, students mostly consider copying a completed assignment of their friend as an act of academic dishonesty. In addition, they mostly argued that professors at universities guess about who might have done plagiarism instead of checking it themselves and they used different strategies to detect plagiarism. The study also indicated that Iranian students had different reasons for plagiarism but they mostly plagiarize because of easiness of plagiarism. Finally, the results of the survey showed that the majority learned about plagiarism from their university professors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abasi, A. R., Akbari, N., & Graves, B. (2006). Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 102–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi, A. (2012). Cheating on exams in the Iranian EFL context. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(2), 151–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsberry, D. (2009). Deconstructing plagiarism: international students and textual borrowing practices. The Reference Librarian, 51(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ange’lil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen language? Plagiarism in writing. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardalan, F., Arfaei, H., Mansouri, R., Balalimood, M., Farhud, D., Malekzadeh, et al. (2009). Iran’s scientists condemn instances of plagiarism. Nature, 462(7275), 847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, T., & Nelson, G. (2001). Plagiarism and the internet: turning the tables. English Journal, 90(4), 101–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamford, J., & Sergiou, K. (2005). International students and plagiarism: an analysis of the reasons for plagiarism among international foundation students. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, T., & Smallwood, S. (2004). Four academic plagiarists you’ve never heard of: how many more are out there? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(17), A8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post–1992 university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, M., & Wenestam, C. (1999). Academic cheating: Frequency, methods and causes. Proceedings of the 1999 European Conference on Educational Research, Lahti, Finland. Available online at: www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001364.htm.

  • Burnett, S. (2002). Dishonor and distrust. Community College Week7 August, 14(24), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. (2009). Plagiarism scandal grows in Iran. Nature, 462(7274), 704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2010). Academic plagiarism: explanatory factors from students’ perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(3), 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., & Ludvigson, H. W. (1995). Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 119–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J. (2004). Plagiarism: What’s really going on? In Seeking educational excellence. Proceedings of the 13th annual teaching learning forum, 9–10 February 2004. Perth: Murdoch University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. M., & Overfield, J. A. (2006). Plagiarism: Do Students Know What It Is?. Bioscience education journal, 8. DOI:10.3108/beej.8.1.

  • Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 181–198. doi:10.1080/07294360701310805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eret, E., & Gokmenoglu, T. (2010). Plagiarism in higher education: a case study with prospective academicians. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3303–3307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. D., & Craig, D. (1990). Adolescent cognitions for academic cheating as a function of grade level and achievement status. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (1994). Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 298–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, M., Rödder, S. W., & Weingart, P. (2007). Fraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. EMBO Reports, 8(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. (2003, July 25). Shortcut to success. Times Higher Education Supplement, 16.

  • Ghazinoory, S., Ghazinoori, S., & Azadegan-Mehr, M. (2011). Iranian academia: evolution after revolution and plagiarism as a disorder. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 213–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Q., & Brooks, J. (2008). Beyond the accusation of plagiarism. System, 36, 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: a focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V., Diekhoff, G., LaBeff, E., & Clark, R. (1986). College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralising attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamp–Lyons, L. (2009). Access, equity and… plagiarism? TESOL Quarterly, 43(4), 690–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s wrong, but everybody does it: academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 209–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: the role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatib, M., & Rezaei, S. (2013). A model and questionnaire of language identity in Iran: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. doi:10.1080/01434632.2013.796958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitalong, K. (1998). A web of symbolic violence. Computers and Composition, 15, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. (2000). Student cheating and plagiarism in the internet era: A wake-up call. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leming, J. S. (1980). Cheating behavior, subject variables and components of the internal–external scale under high and low risk conditions. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(2), 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D. (2005). Plagiarism in ESOL students: is cultural conditioning truly the major culprit. ELT Journal, 59(3), 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, P. G., & Simmon, J. (1998). Factors influencing cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. College Student Journal, 32, 539–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, M., & Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism- a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 233–245. doi:10.1080/02602930500262536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maramark, S., & Maline, M. B. (1993). Issues in education: Academic dishonesty among college students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviors in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, B. (2007). Plagiarism, alchemy and remedy in higher education. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. (1994). Plagiarism: a misplaced emphasis. Journal of Information Ethics, 3(2), 36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Lafferty, C., & Foust, K. (2004). Electronic plagiarism as a college instructor’s nightmare- prevention and detection. The Journal of Education for Business, 79(3), 186–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. (2003). Promoting academic integrity-A US/Canadian perspective. Paper presented at the Educational integrity: Plagiarism and other perplexities conference (November 21–22, 2003), Adelaide, Australia. In conference proceedings (3–12) H. Marsden, M. Hicks and A. Bundy (eds.), Educational integrity: Plagiarism and other perplexities.

  • McKenzie, J. (1998). The new plagiarism: seven antidotes to prevent highway robbery in an electronic age. Educational Technology Journal, 7(8), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody, J. (2007). Plagiarism or intertextuality?: approaches to teaching EFL academic writing. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: plagiarism by university students-literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pecorari, D. (2008). Plagiarism, patch writing and source use: Best practice in the composition classroom. In P. Friedrich (Ed.), Teaching academic writing (pp. 222–241). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, C. H., Stewart, N., & Lee, J. C. (2012). Attitudes of business students’ toward plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(3), 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffetto, W. G. (1985). The cheat. Community and Junior College Journal, 56(2), 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. N. (1986). Public university responses to academic dishonesty: disciplinary or academic. Journal of Law and Education, 15(4), 369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. S. (2008). Student plagiarism in an online world: Problems and solutions. New York: Hershey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2008). “Developing the technological imagination: Theorizing the social shaping and consequences of new technologies”, in Livingstone, S. (Ed.), Theorizing the Benefits of New Technology for Youth, University of Oxford, Oxford, available at: www.education.ox.ac. uk/esrcseries (accessed 3 April 2009).

  • Sendag, S., Duran, M., & Fraser, M. R. (2012). Surveying the extent of involvement in online academic dishonesty (e-dishonesty) related practices among university students and the rationale students provide: one university’s experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 849–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song-Turner, H. (2008). Plagiarism: academic dishonesty or blind spot of multicultural education? Australian Universities Review, 50(2), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, P. (2011). Gauging the effectiveness of anti-plagiarism software: an empirical study of second language graduate writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. E., & Stevens, F. W. (1987). Ethical inclinations of tomorrow’s managers revisited. The Journal of Education for Business, 63(1), 24–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straw, D. (2002). The plagiarism of generation ‘why not?’. Community College Week 8 July, 14(24), 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005a). Pandora’s box: academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005b). The tangled web: internet plagiarism and international students’ academic writing. Journal of Asian PacificCommunication, 15(1), 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the internet and student learning. London: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Synder, L. G., & Cannoy, S. D. (2010). Business communication: instructional strategies to prevent plagiarism. Business Education Forum, 65, 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabo, A., & Underwood, J. (2004). Cybercheats. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 180–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to offer our heartfelt thanks to those without whom this research would not have been possible. Many people have contributed to this research study, and we are sincerely grateful to all of them for their guidance, insight, and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Rezaei.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 9 ᅟ

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rezanejad, A., Rezaei, S. Academic Dishonesty at Universities: The Case of Plagiarism Among Iranian Language Students. J Acad Ethics 11, 275–295 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9193-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-013-9193-8

Keywords

  • Academic dishonesty
  • Plagiarism
  • Iran
  • Perception
  • Language students