Advertisement

Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 275–295 | Cite as

Academic Dishonesty at Universities: The Case of Plagiarism Among Iranian Language Students

  • Atefeh Rezanejad
  • Saeed RezaeiEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study investigated Iranian language students’ perception of and familiarity with plagiarism, their attitudes toward their professors regarding this issue, and their reasons for doing so. The participants were 122 undergraduate and graduate language students in Translation, Literature, TEFL, and Linguistics who filled out a validated and piloted questionnaire. Overall, the results indicated that students had different views about the definition of plagiarism and plagiarism was mostly perceived by students as using someone else’s words as if they were their own rather than taking someone’s ideas without permission. It was also found that in their academic career, students mostly consider copying a completed assignment of their friend as an act of academic dishonesty. In addition, they mostly argued that professors at universities guess about who might have done plagiarism instead of checking it themselves and they used different strategies to detect plagiarism. The study also indicated that Iranian students had different reasons for plagiarism but they mostly plagiarize because of easiness of plagiarism. Finally, the results of the survey showed that the majority learned about plagiarism from their university professors.

Keywords

Academic dishonesty Plagiarism Iran Perception Language students 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to offer our heartfelt thanks to those without whom this research would not have been possible. Many people have contributed to this research study, and we are sincerely grateful to all of them for their guidance, insight, and support.

References

  1. Abasi, A. R., & Graves, B. (2008). Academic literacy and plagiarism: conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(4), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abasi, A. R., Akbari, N., & Graves, B. (2006). Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmadi, A. (2012). Cheating on exams in the Iranian EFL context. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(2), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amsberry, D. (2009). Deconstructing plagiarism: international students and textual borrowing practices. The Reference Librarian, 51(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ange’lil-Carter, S. (2000). Stolen language? Plagiarism in writing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Ardalan, F., Arfaei, H., Mansouri, R., Balalimood, M., Farhud, D., Malekzadeh, et al. (2009). Iran’s scientists condemn instances of plagiarism. Nature, 462(7275), 847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atkins, T., & Nelson, G. (2001). Plagiarism and the internet: turning the tables. English Journal, 90(4), 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bamford, J., & Sergiou, K. (2005). International students and plagiarism: an analysis of the reasons for plagiarism among international foundation students. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 17–22.Google Scholar
  10. Bartlett, T., & Smallwood, S. (2004). Four academic plagiarists you’ve never heard of: how many more are out there? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 51(17), A8.Google Scholar
  11. Bennett, R. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post–1992 university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(2), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjorklund, M., & Wenestam, C. (1999). Academic cheating: Frequency, methods and causes. Proceedings of the 1999 European Conference on Educational Research, Lahti, Finland. Available online at: www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001364.htm.
  13. Burnett, S. (2002). Dishonor and distrust. Community College Week7 August, 14(24), 6–8.Google Scholar
  14. Butler, D. (2009). Plagiarism scandal grows in Iran. Nature, 462(7274), 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre, J. (2010). Academic plagiarism: explanatory factors from students’ perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(3), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis, S. F., & Ludvigson, H. W. (1995). Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 119–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dawson, J. (2004). Plagiarism: What’s really going on? In Seeking educational excellence. Proceedings of the 13th annual teaching learning forum, 9–10 February 2004. Perth: Murdoch University.Google Scholar
  19. Dawson, M. M., & Overfield, J. A. (2006). Plagiarism: Do Students Know What It Is?. Bioscience education journal, 8. DOI: 10.3108/beej.8.1.
  20. Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 181–198. doi: 10.1080/07294360701310805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eret, E., & Gokmenoglu, T. (2010). Plagiarism in higher education: a case study with prospective academicians. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 3303–3307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans, E. D., & Craig, D. (1990). Adolescent cognitions for academic cheating as a function of grade level and achievement status. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fox, M. F. (1994). Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franzen, M., Rödder, S. W., & Weingart, P. (2007). Fraud: causes and culprits as perceived by science and the media. EMBO Reports, 8(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Furedi, F. (2003, July 25). Shortcut to success. Times Higher Education Supplement, 16.Google Scholar
  26. Ghazinoory, S., Ghazinoori, S., & Azadegan-Mehr, M. (2011). Iranian academia: evolution after revolution and plagiarism as a disorder. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gu, Q., & Brooks, J. (2008). Beyond the accusation of plagiarism. System, 36, 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students’ perceptions of plagiarism: a focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haines, V., Diekhoff, G., LaBeff, E., & Clark, R. (1986). College cheating: immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralising attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25(4), 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamp–Lyons, L. (2009). Access, equity and… plagiarism? TESOL Quarterly, 43(4), 690–693.Google Scholar
  31. Jensen, L. A., Arnett, J. J., Feldman, S. S., & Cauffman, E. (2002). It’s wrong, but everybody does it: academic dishonesty among high school and college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, D. L. R. (2011). Academic dishonesty: are more students cheating? Business Communication Quarterly, 74(2), 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: the role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes, and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Khatib, M., & Rezaei, S. (2013). A model and questionnaire of language identity in Iran: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2013.796958.Google Scholar
  35. Kitalong, K. (1998). A web of symbolic violence. Computers and Composition, 15, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. (2000). Student cheating and plagiarism in the internet era: A wake-up call. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  37. Leming, J. S. (1980). Cheating behavior, subject variables and components of the internal–external scale under high and low risk conditions. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(2), 83–87.Google Scholar
  38. Liu, D. (2005). Plagiarism in ESOL students: is cultural conditioning truly the major culprit. ELT Journal, 59(3), 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Love, P. G., & Simmon, J. (1998). Factors influencing cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. College Student Journal, 32, 539–551.Google Scholar
  40. Macdonald, M., & Carroll, J. (2006). Plagiarism- a complex issue requiring a holistic institutional approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 233–245. doi: 10.1080/02602930500262536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maramark, S., & Maline, M. B. (1993). Issues in education: Academic dishonesty among college students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar
  42. Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J. T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviors in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marsh, B. (2007). Plagiarism, alchemy and remedy in higher education. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, B. (1994). Plagiarism: a misplaced emphasis. Journal of Information Ethics, 3(2), 36–47.Google Scholar
  45. Mc Lafferty, C., & Foust, K. (2004). Electronic plagiarism as a college instructor’s nightmare- prevention and detection. The Journal of Education for Business, 79(3), 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCabe, D. (2003). Promoting academic integrity-A US/Canadian perspective. Paper presented at the Educational integrity: Plagiarism and other perplexities conference (November 21–22, 2003), Adelaide, Australia. In conference proceedings (3–12) H. Marsden, M. Hicks and A. Bundy (eds.), Educational integrity: Plagiarism and other perplexities.Google Scholar
  47. McKenzie, J. (1998). The new plagiarism: seven antidotes to prevent highway robbery in an electronic age. Educational Technology Journal, 7(8), 1–11.Google Scholar
  48. Moody, J. (2007). Plagiarism or intertextuality?: approaches to teaching EFL academic writing. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 195–210.Google Scholar
  49. Park, C. (2003). In other (people’s) words: plagiarism by university students-literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pecorari, D. (2008). Plagiarism, patch writing and source use: Best practice in the composition classroom. In P. Friedrich (Ed.), Teaching academic writing (pp. 222–241). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  52. Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Quah, C. H., Stewart, N., & Lee, J. C. (2012). Attitudes of business students’ toward plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(3), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Raffetto, W. G. (1985). The cheat. Community and Junior College Journal, 56(2), 26–27.Google Scholar
  55. Roberts, R. N. (1986). Public university responses to academic dishonesty: disciplinary or academic. Journal of Law and Education, 15(4), 369–384.Google Scholar
  56. Roberts, T. S. (2008). Student plagiarism in an online world: Problems and solutions. New York: Hershey.Google Scholar
  57. Selwyn, N. (2008). “Developing the technological imagination: Theorizing the social shaping and consequences of new technologies”, in Livingstone, S. (Ed.), Theorizing the Benefits of New Technology for Youth, University of Oxford, Oxford, available at: www.education.ox.ac. uk/esrcseries (accessed 3 April 2009).
  58. Sendag, S., Duran, M., & Fraser, M. R. (2012). Surveying the extent of involvement in online academic dishonesty (e-dishonesty) related practices among university students and the rationale students provide: one university’s experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 849–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Song-Turner, H. (2008). Plagiarism: academic dishonesty or blind spot of multicultural education? Australian Universities Review, 50(2), 39–50.Google Scholar
  60. Stapleton, P. (2011). Gauging the effectiveness of anti-plagiarism software: an empirical study of second language graduate writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stevens, G. E., & Stevens, F. W. (1987). Ethical inclinations of tomorrow’s managers revisited. The Journal of Education for Business, 63(1), 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Straw, D. (2002). The plagiarism of generation ‘why not?’. Community College Week 8 July, 14(24), 4–7.Google Scholar
  63. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005a). Pandora’s box: academic perceptions of student plagiarism in writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2005b). The tangled web: internet plagiarism and international students’ academic writing. Journal of Asian PacificCommunication, 15(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
  65. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the internet and student learning. London: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  66. Synder, L. G., & Cannoy, S. D. (2010). Business communication: instructional strategies to prevent plagiarism. Business Education Forum, 65, 23–25.Google Scholar
  67. Szabo, A., & Underwood, J. (2004). Cybercheats. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 180–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Languages and Linguistics DepartmentSharif University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations