Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Plagiarism Among Dissertations: Prevalence at Online Institutions

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current research literature has claimed that plagiarism is a significant problem in postsecondary education. Unfortunately, these claims are primarily supported by self-report data from students. In fact little research has been done to quantify the prevalence of plagiarism particularly at the advanced graduate education level. Further, few studies exist on online education even though this is a rapidly growing sector of higher education. This descriptive study quantified the amount of plagiarism that existed among 100 doctoral dissertations that were published by institutions granting doctorate degrees through a primarily online format. The dissertations were submitted to Turnitin plagiarism detection software for analysis. The mean similarity index of these dissertations was 15.1 (SD = 13.02). The results were then categorized per previous research. Forty-six percent of the dissertations were classified as having a low level of plagiarism while 11 % had a medium level and 3 % had a high level. Further analysis revealed that 72 % of the dissertations had at least one case of improper paraphrasing and citation (verbatim text accompanied by a citation) and 46 % had verbatim text without any citation. The results of this study should encourage faculty, dissertation committee members, university administrators, and accrediting bodies to take action to help reduce the level of plagiarism among doctoral learners. Suggestions for future research include comparing online and brick-and-mortar dissertation plagiarism rates, a larger study to investigate plagiarism trend data, and surveys of faculty about how they address plagiarism and ethics during the dissertation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, G., Callagher, L., Connors, M., Joyce, D., & Rees, M. (2005). Some Australasian perspective on academic integrity in the internet age. EDUCAUSE Conference. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland.

  • Auer, N. J., & Krupar, E. M. (2001). Mouse click plagiarism: the role of technology in plagiarism and the librarian’s role in combating it. Library Trends, 49(3), 415–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to fight plagiarism among university students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009a). Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual reuse? Journal of Academic Ethics, 7, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009b). A model for determining student plagiarism: electronic detection and academic judgment. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 6(1).

  • Cabral-Cardoso, C. (2004). Ethical misconduct in the business school: a case of plagiarism that turned bitter. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, C., Wilhelm, W., & Neureuther, B. (2009). A study of electronic detection and pedagogical approaches for reducing plagiarism. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, LI(1), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garden, C. (2009). What does my Turnitin report mean? Edinburgh: Edinburgh Napier University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. (2003). Plagiarism in academia: trends and implications. Accountability in Research, 10, 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, J., Strickland, D., Timmerman, B., Maher, M., & Feldon, D. (2010). Weeds in the flower garden: an exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(1), 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, L., & Morgan, L. (2010). Academic integrity in an online registered nurse to baccalaureate in nursing program. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 41(11), 498–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • iParadigms. (2010a). Literature review: Independently published studies on Turnitin services. Retrieved from http://turnitin.com/en_us/results/middle-and-high-school.

  • iParadigms. (2010b). A summary of the effectiveness of Turnitin. Retrieved from http://pages.turnitin.com/rs/iparadigms/images/Turnitin_Summary_of_Effectiveness.pdf.

  • iParadigms. (2011). Turnitin instructor manual. Retrieved from http://turnitin.com/static/resources/documentation/turnitin/training/en_us/Instructor_Manual_en_us.pdf.

  • Martin, D., Rao, A., & Sloan, L. (2009). Plagiarism, integrity, and workplace deviance: a criterion study. Ethics & Behavior, 19(1), 36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Rao, A., & Sloan, L. (2011). Ethnicity, acculturation, and plagiarism: a criterion study of unethical academic conduct. Human Organization, 70(1), 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2009). Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: an empirical investigation. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(11), 614–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, S. (2005). A history of plagiarism (not my own work). Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/nov/23/comment.stephenmoss.

  • Plagiarism. (2011). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/plagiarism.

  • Plagiarism. (n.d.). Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plagiarism.

  • Postle, K. (2009). Detecting and deterring plagiarism in social work students: implications for learning for practice. Social Work Education, 28(4), 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, B. (2007). Plagiarism detection software report for JISC Plagiarism Advisory Service. Manchester: IT Consultancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, P. M. (2003). Student online plagiarism: how do we respond? College Teaching, 51(4), 161–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikes, P. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft and collusion in academic research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teesside University. (2010). Interpreting Turnitin originality reports. Tees Valley: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (2002, May 23). University sees rise in reports of cheating. Washington Times, p. B-1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, USA

    David Carl Ison

Authors
  1. David Carl Ison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Carl Ison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ison, D.C. Plagiarism Among Dissertations: Prevalence at Online Institutions. J Acad Ethics 10, 227–236 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9165-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9165-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation