Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 227–236 | Cite as

Plagiarism Among Dissertations: Prevalence at Online Institutions

Article

Abstract

The current research literature has claimed that plagiarism is a significant problem in postsecondary education. Unfortunately, these claims are primarily supported by self-report data from students. In fact little research has been done to quantify the prevalence of plagiarism particularly at the advanced graduate education level. Further, few studies exist on online education even though this is a rapidly growing sector of higher education. This descriptive study quantified the amount of plagiarism that existed among 100 doctoral dissertations that were published by institutions granting doctorate degrees through a primarily online format. The dissertations were submitted to Turnitin plagiarism detection software for analysis. The mean similarity index of these dissertations was 15.1 (SD = 13.02). The results were then categorized per previous research. Forty-six percent of the dissertations were classified as having a low level of plagiarism while 11 % had a medium level and 3 % had a high level. Further analysis revealed that 72 % of the dissertations had at least one case of improper paraphrasing and citation (verbatim text accompanied by a citation) and 46 % had verbatim text without any citation. The results of this study should encourage faculty, dissertation committee members, university administrators, and accrediting bodies to take action to help reduce the level of plagiarism among doctoral learners. Suggestions for future research include comparing online and brick-and-mortar dissertation plagiarism rates, a larger study to investigate plagiarism trend data, and surveys of faculty about how they address plagiarism and ethics during the dissertation process.

Keywords

Plagiarism Higher education Doctorate Dissertation Research Ethics Turnitin 

References

  1. Allan, G., Callagher, L., Connors, M., Joyce, D., & Rees, M. (2005). Some Australasian perspective on academic integrity in the internet age. EDUCAUSE Conference. Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  2. Auer, N. J., & Krupar, E. M. (2001). Mouse click plagiarism: the role of technology in plagiarism and the librarian’s role in combating it. Library Trends, 49(3), 415–432.Google Scholar
  3. Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to fight plagiarism among university students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1–12.Google Scholar
  4. Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009a). Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual reuse? Journal of Academic Ethics, 7, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009b). A model for determining student plagiarism: electronic detection and academic judgment. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 6(1).Google Scholar
  6. Cabral-Cardoso, C. (2004). Ethical misconduct in the business school: a case of plagiarism that turned bitter. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chao, C., Wilhelm, W., & Neureuther, B. (2009). A study of electronic detection and pedagogical approaches for reducing plagiarism. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, LI(1), 31–42.Google Scholar
  8. Garden, C. (2009). What does my Turnitin report mean? Edinburgh: Edinburgh Napier University.Google Scholar
  9. Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. (2003). Plagiarism in academia: trends and implications. Accountability in Research, 10, 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilmore, J., Strickland, D., Timmerman, B., Maher, M., & Feldon, D. (2010). Weeds in the flower garden: an exploration of plagiarism in graduate students’ research proposals and its connection to enculturation, ESL, and contextual factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
  11. Hart, L., & Morgan, L. (2010). Academic integrity in an online registered nurse to baccalaureate in nursing program. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 41(11), 498–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. iParadigms. (2010a). Literature review: Independently published studies on Turnitin services. Retrieved from http://turnitin.com/en_us/results/middle-and-high-school.
  13. iParadigms. (2010b). A summary of the effectiveness of Turnitin. Retrieved from http://pages.turnitin.com/rs/iparadigms/images/Turnitin_Summary_of_Effectiveness.pdf.
  14. Martin, D., Rao, A., & Sloan, L. (2009). Plagiarism, integrity, and workplace deviance: a criterion study. Ethics & Behavior, 19(1), 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin, D., Rao, A., & Sloan, L. (2011). Ethnicity, acculturation, and plagiarism: a criterion study of unethical academic conduct. Human Organization, 70(1), 88–96.Google Scholar
  16. McCabe, D. L. (2009). Academic dishonesty in nursing schools: an empirical investigation. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(11), 614–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moss, S. (2005). A history of plagiarism (not my own work). Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2005/nov/23/comment.stephenmoss.
  18. Plagiarism. (2011). Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.learnersdictionary.com/search/plagiarism.
  19. Plagiarism. (n.d.). Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/plagiarism.
  20. Postle, K. (2009). Detecting and deterring plagiarism in social work students: implications for learning for practice. Social Work Education, 28(4), 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scaife, B. (2007). Plagiarism detection software report for JISC Plagiarism Advisory Service. Manchester: IT Consultancy.Google Scholar
  22. Scanlon, P. M. (2003). Student online plagiarism: how do we respond? College Teaching, 51(4), 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374–385.Google Scholar
  24. Sikes, P. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft and collusion in academic research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Teesside University. (2010). Interpreting Turnitin originality reports. Tees Valley: Author.Google Scholar
  26. Walker, J. (2010). Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ward, J. (2002, May 23). University sees rise in reports of cheating. Washington Times, p. B-1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDaytona BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations