Abstract
This paper is the first phase of a longitudinal study of the class of 2014 on the effectiveness of ethics education at a business university. This phase of the project establishes the baseline attributes of incoming college freshmen with a pretest of the students’ ethical proclivity as measured by Defining Issues Test (DIT-2) scores. The relationship between the students’ ethical reasoning and their behavior in experimental stock trading sessions is then examined. In the trading simulations, randomly selected students were provided with the option of receiving privileged insider information about the final payoff of several stocks. The students could either accept or reject such information, with acceptance considered illegal insider trading. The results of the pretest indicate that moral reasoning as measured by the DIT-2 is related to insider trading behavior, with students with higher DIT-2 scores being less likely to accept insider information. The paper also presents demographic differences across DIT-2 scores and trading behavior as a foundation for the longitudinal examination of changes in students’ moral cognition characteristics and behavior during their undergraduate career.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Sultan, J. (2002). Ethical reasoning and the use of insider information in trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(2), 165–173.
Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Reeves, M. F. (2000). Effects of education and intervention on business students’ ethical cognition: A cross sectional and longitudinal study. Teaching Business Ethics, 4, 269–284.
Bailey, C. D., Scott, I., & Thoma, S. J. (2010). Revitalizing accounting ethics research in the Neo-Kohlbergian framework: Putting the DIT into perspective. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 1–26.
Bainbridge, S. M. (2009). Caremark and enterprise risk management. Journal of Corporation Law, 34, 967–990.
Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (2003). Guide for DIT-2—Center for the Study of Ethical Development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Charness, G., & Garoupa, N. (2000). Reputation, honesty, and efficiency with insider information: An experiment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(3), 425–451.
Engelen, P.-J., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2007). The ethics of insider trading revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 497–507.
Ferguson, J., Collison, D., Power, D., & Stevenson, L. (2011). Accounting education, socialization and the ethics of business. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(1), 12–29.
Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5/6), 461–470.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.
Gordon, I. (2011). Lessons to be learned: An examination of Canadian and U.S. financial accounting and auditing textbooks for ethics/governance coverage. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 29–47.
Hartikainen, O. & Torstila, S. (2004). Job-Related Ethical Judgment in the Finance Profession. Journal of Applied Finance Spring/Summer: 62–78.
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 2, 366–39S.
Kaplan, D. A., & Kowitt, B. (2009). MBAs get schooled in ethics. Fortune, 160(8), 27–28.
Kay, J. (2003). Why fat cats are bad for business. New Statesman, June, 2, 22–24.
King, P. A., & Mayhew, M. J. (2002). Moral judgment development in higher education: Insights for the defining issues test. Journal of Moral Education, 31(3), 247–270.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. New York: Harpercollins.
Maeda, Y., Thoma, S. J., & Bedeau, M. J. (2009). Understanding the relationship between moral judgment development and individual characteristics: The role of educational contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 233–247.
Miller, R. (2009). The ethics narrative and the role of the business school in moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 287–293.
Morone, J. (2002). Our High-flying Habit. Boston Globe, October 6.
Neubaum, D. O., Pagell, M., Drexler, J. A., Mckee-Ryan, F. M., & Larson, E. (2009). Business education and its relationship to student personal moral philosophies and attitudes toward profits: An empirical response to critics. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 9–24.
Persons, O. (2009). Using a Corporate Code of Ethics to Assess Students’ Ethicality: Implications for Business Education. Journal of Education for Business, July/August: 357–366.
Pfeffer, J. (2003). The Human Factor: Teaching the Wrong Lesson. Business 2.0, 4(10): 60.
Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.
Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Sayther, C. (2003). Report Card on Sarbanes-Oxley: One Year Later. Financial Executive (October): 6.
Walker, L. J., & Frimer, J. A. (2007). Moral personality of brave and caring examples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 845–860.
Wilhelm, W.J. (2010). Ethical Reasoning Instruction in Non-Ethics business courses: A non-intrusive Approach. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 52(3), 152–167.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fletcher-Brown, D., Buono, A.F., Frederick, R. et al. A Longitudinal Study of the Effectiveness of Business Ethics Education: Establishing the Baseline. J Acad Ethics 10, 45–56 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9149-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9149-4