A Longitudinal Study of the Effectiveness of Business Ethics Education: Establishing the Baseline

Abstract

This paper is the first phase of a longitudinal study of the class of 2014 on the effectiveness of ethics education at a business university. This phase of the project establishes the baseline attributes of incoming college freshmen with a pretest of the students’ ethical proclivity as measured by Defining Issues Test (DIT-2) scores. The relationship between the students’ ethical reasoning and their behavior in experimental stock trading sessions is then examined. In the trading simulations, randomly selected students were provided with the option of receiving privileged insider information about the final payoff of several stocks. The students could either accept or reject such information, with acceptance considered illegal insider trading. The results of the pretest indicate that moral reasoning as measured by the DIT-2 is related to insider trading behavior, with students with higher DIT-2 scores being less likely to accept insider information. The paper also presents demographic differences across DIT-2 scores and trading behavior as a foundation for the longitudinal examination of changes in students’ moral cognition characteristics and behavior during their undergraduate career.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Sultan, J. (2002). Ethical reasoning and the use of insider information in trading. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(2), 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Reeves, M. F. (2000). Effects of education and intervention on business students’ ethical cognition: A cross sectional and longitudinal study. Teaching Business Ethics, 4, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey, C. D., Scott, I., & Thoma, S. J. (2010). Revitalizing accounting ethics research in the Neo-Kohlbergian framework: Putting the DIT into perspective. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bainbridge, S. M. (2009). Caremark and enterprise risk management. Journal of Corporation Law, 34, 967–990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bebeau, M. J., & Thoma, S. J. (2003). Guide for DIT-2—Center for the Study of Ethical Development. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charness, G., & Garoupa, N. (2000). Reputation, honesty, and efficiency with insider information: An experiment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 9(3), 425–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Engelen, P.-J., & Van Liedekerke, L. (2007). The ethics of insider trading revisited. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferguson, J., Collison, D., Power, D., & Stevenson, L. (2011). Accounting education, socialization and the ethics of business. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(1), 12–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The influence of personal moral philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(5/6), 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon, I. (2011). Lessons to be learned: An examination of Canadian and U.S. financial accounting and auditing textbooks for ethics/governance coverage. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hartikainen, O. & Torstila, S. (2004). Job-Related Ethical Judgment in the Finance Profession. Journal of Applied Finance Spring/Summer: 62–78.

  13. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 2, 366–39S.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan, D. A., & Kowitt, B. (2009). MBAs get schooled in ethics. Fortune, 160(8), 27–28.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kay, J. (2003). Why fat cats are bad for business. New Statesman, June, 2, 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  16. King, P. A., & Mayhew, M. J. (2002). Moral judgment development in higher education: Insights for the defining issues test. Journal of Moral Education, 31(3), 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. New York: Harpercollins.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maeda, Y., Thoma, S. J., & Bedeau, M. J. (2009). Understanding the relationship between moral judgment development and individual characteristics: The role of educational contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, R. (2009). The ethics narrative and the role of the business school in moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 287–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morone, J. (2002). Our High-flying Habit. Boston Globe, October 6.

  21. Neubaum, D. O., Pagell, M., Drexler, J. A., Mckee-Ryan, F. M., & Larson, E. (2009). Business education and its relationship to student personal moral philosophies and attitudes toward profits: An empirical response to critics. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Persons, O. (2009). Using a Corporate Code of Ethics to Assess Students’ Ethicality: Implications for Business Education. Journal of Education for Business, July/August: 357–366.

  23. Pfeffer, J. (2003). The Human Factor: Teaching the Wrong Lesson. Business 2.0, 4(10): 60.

  24. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sayther, C. (2003). Report Card on Sarbanes-Oxley: One Year Later. Financial Executive (October): 6.

  27. Walker, L. J., & Frimer, J. A. (2007). Moral personality of brave and caring examples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 845–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilhelm, W.J. (2010). Ethical Reasoning Instruction in Non-Ethics business courses: A non-intrusive Approach. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 52(3), 152–167.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna Fletcher-Brown.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fletcher-Brown, D., Buono, A.F., Frederick, R. et al. A Longitudinal Study of the Effectiveness of Business Ethics Education: Establishing the Baseline. J Acad Ethics 10, 45–56 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9149-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Business ethics
  • Ethical reasoning
  • Insider trading
  • Stock trading
  • Ethical behavior
  • Longitudinal study