Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 187–197 | Cite as

What is Ethical About Grade Inflation and Coursework Deflation?

  • Donald Larry Crumbley
  • Ronald E. Flinn
  • Kenneth J. Reichelt
Article

Abstract

Recent research questions the validity of student evaluation of teaching (SET) data to measure teaching and learning. Yet, there is extensive use of this instrument around the world, which arguably contributes to a decline in the rigor of college classes. This performance measurement has lead to both unethical grade inflation and coursework deflation as faculty try to entertain students rather than educating them. These unethical teaching techniques used by many faculties are on the same plane as the unethical practices of executives “cooking their books.” Ethical and unethical SET management techniques of professors are discussed herein, along with incentive and structural pander pollution of administrators and universities.

Keywords

Student evaluation of teachers Pander pollution Grade inflation Dysfunctional behavior Impression management Earnings management 

References

  1. Aigner, D. J., & Thum, F. D. (1986). On student evaluations of teaching ability. Journal of Economic Education, 17(4), 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, J. V. (1997). Student evaluations: the rating game. Inquiry, 1(2), 10–16.Google Scholar
  3. Bale, J., & Dudney, D. (2000). Teaching generation X: do andragogical learning principles apply to undergraduate finance education? Financial Practice & Education, 10(1), 216–227.Google Scholar
  4. Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, D. L. (1976). Faculty ratings and student grades: a university-wide multiple regression analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 573–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cochran, L. (1992). Publish or perish: The wrong issue. Agendas, alternatives, applications, actions. Cape Girardeau: StepUp Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Crumbley, D. L. (1995). The Dysfunctional Atmosphere of Higher Education: Games Professors Play. Accounting Perspectives, 1(1), 67–77.Google Scholar
  8. Crumbley, D. L., & Fliedner, E. (2002). Accounting administrators’ perceptions of student evaluation of teaching (SET) information. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(4), 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crumbley, D. L., & Reichelt, K. (2009). Teaching effectiveness, impression management, and dysfunctional behavior. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(4), 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crumbley, D. L., & Smith, S. (2009). The games professors play in the dysfunctional performance evaluation system used in higher education: Brainstorming some recommendations. In: Measuring learning rather than satisfaction in higher education (pp. 41–58). Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar
  11. Crumbley, D. L., Henry, B. K., & Kratchman, S. (2001). Students’ perceptions of the evaluation of college teaching. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(4), 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, M., Hirshberg, J., Lye, J., Johnson, C., & McDonald, I. (2007). Systematic influences on teaching evaluations: the case for caution. Australian Economic Papers, 46(1), 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ditts, D. A. (1983). A statistical interpretation of student evaluation feedback. Journal of Economic Education (Spring), 10–15.Google Scholar
  14. Dowell, D. A., & Neal, J. A. (1983). The validity and accuracy of student ratings of instructors: a reply to Peter A. Cohen. Journal of Higher Education (July/August), 459–463.Google Scholar
  15. DuCette, J., & Kenney, J. (1982). Do grading standards affect student evaluations of teaching? Some new evidence on an old question. Journal of Education Psychology, 308–314.Google Scholar
  16. Dwinell, P. L., & Higbee, J. L. (1993). Students’ perceptions of the value of teaching evaluations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 995–1000.Google Scholar
  17. Eiszler, C. F. (2002). College students’ evaluation of teaching and grade inflation. Research in Higher Education, 43(4), 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fellingham, J. (2007). Is accounting an academic discipline? Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer, J. (2007). Implications of recent research on student evaluations of teaching. University of Louisville. Law School. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2007-20. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1005681.
  20. Flinn, D. E., & Crumbley, D. L. (2009). Measuring learning rather than satisfaction in higher education (p. 222). Sarasota: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar
  21. Fuller, J., & Jensen, M. C. (2010). Just say no to Wall Street: putting a stop to the earnings game. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22(1), 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Germain, M. L., & Scandura, T. A. (2005). Grade inflation and student individual differences as systemic bias in faculty evaluations. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 32(1), 58–67.Google Scholar
  23. Haskell, R. E. (1997). Academic freedom, tenure, and student evaluations of faculty. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(16), 1–36.Google Scholar
  24. Hill, J. (2010). Rating your professors: scholars test improved course evaluations. Chronicle of Higher Education, April 25, 2010.Google Scholar
  25. Howard, G. S., & Maxwell, S. E. (1982). Do grades contaminate student evaluations of instruction? Research in Higher Education, 175–188.Google Scholar
  26. Isely, P., & Singh, H. (2005). Do higher grades lead to favorable student evaluations? Journal of Economic Education, 36(1), 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jacobs, B., & Van der Ploeg, F. (2006). Guide to reform of higher education: a european perspective. Economic Policy, 21(47), 535–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jaschik, S. (2010). No grading, more learning. Insider Higher Ed (May 3). Available from: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/05/03/grading.
  29. Johnson, M., & Johnson, L. (2010). Generations, Inc.: From boomers to linksters—managing the friction between generations at work. New York: AMACOM.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, J. C., & Spraakman, G. (2010). A case of academic misconduct: Does self-interest rule? Working paper, January 2010.Google Scholar
  31. Kau, J. B., & Rubin, P. H. (1976). Measurement techniques, grades and ratings of instructors. Journal of Economic Education, 8(1), 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krautmann, A. C., & Sander, W. (1999). Grades and student evaluations of teachers. Economics of Education Review, 18(1), 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malabre, A. L., Jr. (1994). Lost prophets: An insider’s history of the modern economists (p. 220). Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  34. Martin, G. (1998). Evaluating faculty based on student opinions: problems, implications and recommendations from deming’s theory of management perspective. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(4), 1079–1094.Google Scholar
  35. McPherson, M. (2006). Determinants of how students evaluate teachers. Journal of Economic Education, 37(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mehdizadeh, M. (1990). Loglinear models and student course evaluations. Journal of Economic Education, 21(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore, P. (2009). Why we should measure learning: A glossary of collegiate corruption. In: Measuring learning rather than satisfaction in higher education (pp. 17–28). Sarasota: American Accounting Association.Google Scholar
  38. Neath, I. (1996). How to improve your teaching evaluations without improving your teaching. Psychological Reports, 78, 1363–1372.Google Scholar
  39. Newton, J. D. (1988). Using student evaluation of teaching in administrative control: the validity problem. Journal of Accounting Education, 6(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  40. Nichols, A., & Soper, J. C. (1972). Economic man in the classroom. Journal of Political Economy, 80, 1069–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Olds, P. R., & Crumbley, D. L. (2003). Higher grades = higher evaluations: impression management of students. Quality Assurance in Education., 11(3), 172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Porcano, T. M. (1984). An empirical analysis of some factors affecting student performance. Journal of Accounting Education (Fall), 111–126.Google Scholar
  43. Powell, R. W. (1977). Grades, learning, and student evaluation of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 193–205.Google Scholar
  44. Pressman, S. (2007). The economics of grade inflation. Challenge, 50(5), 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rampell, C. (2010). In law schools, grades go up, just like that. New York Times, June 21.Google Scholar
  46. Renner, R. R. (1981). Comparing professors: how student ratings contribute to the decline in quality of higher education. Phi Delta Kappa (October), 128–131.Google Scholar
  47. Rosenfeld, P. R., Giacalone, A., & Riordan, C. A. (1994). Impression management theory and diversity. American Behavioral Scientist, 12(4), 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sacks, P. (1996). Generation X goes to college: An eye-opening account of teaching in postmodern America (p. 208). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  49. Saje, N. (2005). Teaching for tips. Liberal Education, 91(1), 48–50.Google Scholar
  50. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  51. Schneider, D. J. (1969). Tactical self-preservation after success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 262–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schweitzer, T. A. (1992). Academic challenge’ cases: should judicial review extend to academic evaluations of students? The American University Law Review, 41, 267–367.Google Scholar
  53. Shapiro, M. (2002). Irreverent commentary on the state of education in America Today. (July 15). Available at: http://irascibleprofessor.com/comments-07-15-02.htm.
  54. Sherr, L. (2010). Is college worth the cash? More, 13(6), 63–64.Google Scholar
  55. Simon, W. E. (1996). The dumbing down of higher education. The Wall Street Journal (March 19, 1996), A18.Google Scholar
  56. Snyder, C. R., & Clair, M. (1976). Effects of expected and obtained grades on teacher evaluation and attribution of performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(1), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spellings, M. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education, U.S. Dept. of Education.Google Scholar
  58. Stripling, J. (2010). Burning out, and fading away. Inside Higher Ed (June 20).Google Scholar
  59. Stumpf, S. A., & Freedman, R. D. (1979). Expected grade co-variation with student ratings of instruction: individual vs. class effects. Journal of Education Psychology, 273–302.Google Scholar
  60. Sullivan, A. M., & Skanes, G. R. (1974). Validity of student evaluation of teaching and the characteristics of successful instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(4), 584–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Swann, W. B. (1987). Identity negotiation: where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1038–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Trout, P. (1997). How to improve your teaching evaluation scores without improving teaching. Available at: http://mtprof.msun.edu/Fall1997/HOWTORAI.html.
  63. Vermunt, J. B. (2005). Relations between student learning patterns and personal and contextual factors and academic performance. Higher Education, 49, 205–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wallace, J., & Wallace, W. (1998). Why the costs of student evaluations have long exceeded their value. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(2), 443–447.Google Scholar
  65. Weinberg, B. A., Hashimoto, M., & Fleisher, B. M. (2009). Evaluating teaching in higher education. Research in Economic Education, 40(3), 227–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Winsor, J. L. (1977). A’s, B’s, but not C’s?: A comment. Contemporary Education (Winter), 82–84.Google Scholar
  67. Worthington, A. G., & Wong, P. T. P. (1979). Effects of earned and assigned grades on student evaluations of an instructor. Journal of Educational Psychology, pp. 764–775.Google Scholar
  68. Wright, P., Whittington, R., & Whittenburg, G. E. (1984). Student ratings of teaching effectiveness: what the research reveals. Journal of Accounting Education (Fall), 5–30.Google Scholar
  69. Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: moves toward theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zangenehzadeh, H. (1988). Grade inflation: a way out. Journal of Economic Education, 19(3), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zimmerman, A. (2002). Reduced rigor and grade inflation diminish the quality of higher education. NACTA Journal (December). Available at: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qu4062/is_200212/ai_n9151533/print.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Larry Crumbley
    • 1
  • Ronald E. Flinn
    • 2
  • Kenneth J. Reichelt
    • 1
  1. 1.E. J. Ourso College of BusinessLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.College of Business AdministrationCreighton UniversityOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations