Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 67–84 | Cite as

Students’ Perceptions of Academic and Business Dishonesty: Australian Evidence

  • Soheila Mirshekary
  • Ali Mohammad Yaftian
  • Monir Zaman MirEmail author


Publicly available information indicates that the collapse of the high-profile corporations during the recent past were due to the unethical actions of a number of major players, including high level managers in those corporations. These examples of the ethical misdeeds of corporate actors have influenced accounting professional bodies and academic institutions around the globe to revisit the issue of ethical training of business and accounting students—the corporate managers of tomorrow. However, little is known about the ethical perceptions of business and accounting students, and business academics are finding it challenging to develop and promote ethics-based accounting and business curricula. This study addresses the research gap. It explores the ethical perceptions of accounting and business students in two Australian universities using three paradigms, that is, whether there are differences between regional and metropolitan, male and female, older and younger accounting students with respect to their ethical perceptions. Empirical evidence provided in this study suggests that while there are no differences in ethical perceptions of the regional and metropolitan accounting and business students, female and older students are found to be more ethical compared to male and younger students.


Ethics Regional Metropolitan Accounting students 


  1. Arlow, P., & Ulrich, T. (1980). Business ethics, social responsibility and business students: an empirical comparison of Clark’s study. Akron Business and Economic Review, 11, 17–23.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2005) Accessed 6 January 2005.
  3. Callan, V. (1992). Predicting ethical values and training needs in ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 761–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cochoran, J., Chamlin, M., Wood, P., & Sellers, C. (1999). Shame, embarrassment and formal sanction threats: extending the deterrence/rational choice model to academic dishonesty. Sociological Inquiry, 69(1), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrell, O., & Skinner, S. (1988). Ethical behaviour and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geiger, M., & O’Connell, B. (1999). Accounting student ethical perceptions: an analysis of training and gender effects. Teaching Business Ethics, 2, 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Graham, M., Mondray, J., O’Brien, K., & Steffen, S. (1994). Cheating at small colleges. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 255–260.Google Scholar
  8. Grimes, P. (2004). Dishonesty in academics and business: a cross-cultural evaluation of student attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haswell, S., Jubb, P., & Wearing, B. (1999). Accounting students and cheating: a comparative study for Australia, South Africa and the UK. Teaching Business Ethics, 3, 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hollon, C., & Ulrich, T. (1979). Personal business ethics: managers vs. managers-to-be. Southern Business Review, 5, 17–22.Google Scholar
  11. Kennedy, E., & Lawton, L. (1996). The effects of social and moral integration on ethical standards: a comparison of American and Ukrainian business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 901–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, D., Foster, M., & Kern, D. (2001). Honest intentions: Business students’ perceptions of academic and business ethics. Paper presented at the Academy of Economics and Finance Annual Meetings in Biloxi, 2001; MS. Mississippi State University, College of Business and Industry.Google Scholar
  13. McCuddy, M., & Peery, B. (1996). Selected individual differences and collegians’ ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mirshekary, S., Tennent, B., & Yaftian, A. (2005). Business ethics: a cross-cultural comparison of accounting students. Review of Business Research, 4, 87–98.Google Scholar
  15. Nyaw, M., & Ng, I. (1994). A comparative analysis of ethical beliefs: a four-country study. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Leary, C., & Cotter, D. (2000). The ethics of final year accountancy students: an international comparison. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(3), 108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Owen, Justice. The HIH Royal Commission (2005). The future of HIH insurance and its lessons. Online; accessed 5 January 2005.
  18. Robinson, E., Amburgey, R., Swank, E., & Faulkner, C. (2004). Test cheating in a rural college: studying the importance of individual and situational factors. College Student Journal, 38(3), 380–395.Google Scholar
  19. Rockness, H., & Rockness, J. (2005). Legislated ethics: from Enron to Sarbanes-Oxley, the impact on Corporate America. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruegger, D., & King, E. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(3), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Salter, S., Guffey, D., & McMillan, J. (2001). Truth, consequences and culture: a comparative examination of cheating and attitudes about cheating among U.S. and U.K. students. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smyth, M., & Davis, J. (2004). Perceptions of dishonesty among two-year college students: academic versus business situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stanga, K. G., & Turpen, R. A. (1991). Ethical judgments on selected accounting issues: an empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Staubus, G. (2005). Ethics failures in corporate financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 57, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stevenson, T., & Bodkin, C. (1998). A cross-national comparison of university students’ perceptions regarding the ethics and acceptability of sales practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tang, S., & Zuo, Z. (1997). Profile of college examination cheaters. College Student Journal, 31(3), 340–347.Google Scholar
  27. Tsalikis, J., & LaTour, M. S. (1995). Bribery and extortion in international business: ethical perceptions of Greeks compared to Americans. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tsalikis, J., & Nwachukwu, O. (1991). A comparison of Nigerian to American views of bribery and extortion in international commerce. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winchester, H., Glenn, A., Thomas, P., & Cole, M. (2005). The role of universities in the regions. Discussion paper, Business/Higher Education Round Table (BHERT), Online; accessed 5 January 2005.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soheila Mirshekary
    • 1
  • Ali Mohammad Yaftian
    • 2
  • Monir Zaman Mir
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Deakin Business School, Faculty of Business & LawDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Accounting and FinanceVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Business & GovernmentUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations