Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 259–269 | Cite as

Corruption and Representations of Scholarly Output

  • Robert LieblerEmail author


In this paper I analyze representations of scholarly output for the purpose of identifying corrupt practices. Accordingly, the components of output—price, quantity, and time—are examined. A key part of the analysis is recognizing the unique role that the scholarly community plays in scholarship and the implications this has for the roles of groups other than the scholarly community. Finally, a survey of students indicates that particular representations of scholarly output are viewed by students as unethical.


Scholarship Corruption 



I thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. The views in this manuscript are mine and are not necessarily the views of any organizations with which I am affiliated.


  1. Alexander, J., & Mabry, R. (1994). Relative significance of journals, authors, and articles cited in financial research. The Journal of Finance, 49(2), 697–712. doi: 10.2307/2329169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (2003). The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its subareas over time. Journal of Marketing, 67, 123–139. doi: 10.1509/jmkg. Scholar
  3. Bogle, J. (2005). The battle for the soul of capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boyle, M. (2004). Walking our talk: Business schools, legitimacy, and citizenship. Business & Society, 43(1), 37–68. doi: 10.1177/0007650303262638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borkowski, S., & Welsh, M. (2000). Ethical practice in the accounting publishing process: Contrasting opinions of authors and editors. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 15–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1005939128790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 1801–1824. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(01) 00186-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caldwell, C., Karri, R., & Matula, T. (2005). Practicing what we teach—ethical considerations for business schools. Journal of Academic Ethics, 3, 1–25. doi: 10.1007/s10805-006-9007-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carland, J., Carland, J., & Aby, C. (1992). Proposed codification of ethicacy in the publication process. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 95–104. doi: 10.1007/BF00872316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, J., & Ruhe, J. (2003). Perceptions of country corruption: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 275–288. doi: 10.1023/A:1023038901080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122, 108–111. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471–479. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4060.471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geelhoed, R., Phillips, J., Fisher, A., Shpungin, E., & Gong, Y. (2007). Authorship decision making: An empirical investigation. Ethics & Behavior, 17(2), 95–115.Google Scholar
  13. Getz, K., & Volkema, R. (2001). Culture, perceived corruption, and economics. Business & Society, 40(1), 7–30. doi: 10.1177/000765030104000103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gross, P., & Gross, E. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385–389. doi: 10.1126/science.66.1713.385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Husted, B. (1994). Honor among thieves: A transaction-cost interpretation of corruption in third world countries. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(1), 17–27. doi: 10.2307/3857556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hutchinson, E., & Zivney, T. (1995). The publication profile of economists. The Journal of Economic Education, 26, 59–79. doi: 10.2307/1183466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khatri, N., & Tsang, E. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of cronyism in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 289–303. doi: 10.1023/A:1023081629529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laband, D., & Piette, M. (1994). The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970–1990. Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 640–666.Google Scholar
  19. Lewellyn, P. (1996). Academic perceptions: Ethics in the information system discipline. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 559–569. doi: 10.1007/BF00381931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewis, P. (1985). Defining ‘business ethics’: Like nailing jello to a wall. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 377–383. doi: 10.1007/BF02388590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyer, M., & McMahon, D. (2004). An examination of ethical research conduct by experienced and novice accounting academics. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(4), 413–442. doi: 10.2308/iace.2004.19.4.413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nielsen, R. (2003). Corruption networks and implications for ethical corruption reform. Journal of Business Ethics, 42, 125–149. doi: 10.1023/A:1021969204875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Higgins, E. (2006). Corruption, underdevelopment, and extractive resource industries: Addressing the vicious cycle. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 235–254.Google Scholar
  24. Ponemon, L. (1992). Ethical reasoning and selection-socialization in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(3/4), 239–258. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(92) 90023-L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sandler, J., & Russell, B. (2005). Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics & Behavior, 15(1), 65–80. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tabachnick, B., Keith-Spiegel, P., & Pope, K. (1991). Beliefs and behaviors of psychologists as educators. The American Psychologist, 46(5), 506–515. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.5.506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tahai, A., & Rigsby, J. (1998). Information processing using citations to investigate journal influence in accounting. Information Processing & Management, 34(2/3), 341–359. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4573(97) 00082-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tahai, A., & Meyer, M. (1999). A revealed preference study of management journals’ direct influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 279–296. doi: 10.1002/(SICI) 1097-0266(199903) 20:3<279::AID-SMJ33>3.0.CO;2-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turner, L. (2003). Doffing the mask: Why manuscript reviewers ought to be identifiable. Journal of Academic Ethics, 1, 41–48. doi: 10.1023/A:1025454331738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vincent, V., & De Moville, W. (1993). Ethical considerations for streaming business publications. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 37–43. doi: 10.1007/BF01845785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilhelm, P. (2002). International validation of the corruption perceptions index: Implications for business ethics and entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 177–189. doi: 10.1023/A:1013882225402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations