Abstract
The ethical decision making process behind the treatment of missing data has yet to be examined in the research literature in any discipline. The purpose of the current paper is to begin to discuss this decision-making process in view of a Foucauldian framework. The paper suggests how the ethical treatment of missing data should be considered from the adoption of this theoretical framework.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acock, A. C. (2005). Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1012–1028.
Darmawan, I. G. N. (2002). NORM software review: handling missing values with multiple imputation methods. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 2(1), 51–57.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
Horton, N. J., & Kleinman, K. P. (2007). Much ado about nothing: A comparison of missing data methods and software to fit incomplete data regression models. The American Statistician, 61(1), 79–90.
Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barnard, L., Lan, W.Y. Treatment of Missing Data: Beyond Ends and Means. J Acad Ethics 6, 173–176 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9064-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-008-9064-x