Abstract
This article examines how Canadian ethics policies affects historians who use oral history, and focuses on privacy and confidentiality, free and informed consent, and research involving Aboriginal peoples. The article concludes with recommendations for developing ethics policies that accord with historical methodology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
I thank Peter L. Twohig for these suggestions.
References
Coates, K. (2000). Writing First Nations into Canadian history: A review of recent scholarly works, Canadian Historical Review 81(1), 99–114.
Cruikshank, J. (1994). Oral tradition and oral history: Reviewing some issues, Canadian Historical Review 75(3), 218–403.
Dubinsky, K. (1996). ‘Who do you think did the cooking?’ Baba in the classroom, In M. Kechnie and M. Reitsma-Street (Eds.), Changing Lives: Women in Northern Ontario, Toronto: Dundurn, pp. 193–197.
Fiske, J.-A. (2000). By, for, or about?: Shifting directions in the representations of Aboriginal women, Atlantis 25(1), 11–27 (Fall).
Frisch, M. (1998). Oral history and hard times: A review essay, In R. Perks and A. Thomson (Eds.), The Oral History Reader, London: Routledge, pp. 28–37.
Gluck, S. B. and Patai, D. (1991). Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History. New York: Routledge.
Huntley, A. and Blaney, F. (1999). Bill C-31: Its Impact, Implications and Recommendations for Change in British Columbia – Final Report. Vancouver: Aboriginal Women’s Action Network.
Iacovetta, F. and Mitchinson, W. (Eds.) (1998). On the Case: Explorations in Social History. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Janovicek, N., Carter, S. and Twohig, P. L. (2003). Submission to Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics Consultation, November (copy with author).
McIvor, S. D. (1999). Self-government and Aboriginal women, In E. Dua and A. Robertson (Eds.), Scratching the Surface: Canadian Anti-Racist Thought. Toronto: Women’s, pp. 167–186.
Medical Research Council, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (1998). Tri-Council Policy Statement on Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa, ON: Public Works and Government Services Canada.
Mi’kmaq Ethics Watch (2003). Principles and Guidelines fo Researchers Conducting Research With and/or Among Mi’kmaq People, available at: http://mrc.uccb.mc.ca/prinpro/html. Accessed 29 January 2004.
Milloy, J. S. (1999). A National Crime: The Canadian Government and the Residential School System, 1879–1986. Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba Press.
Patterson, S. E. (1998). History, native issues and the courts: A forum. Historians and the courts, Acadiensis 28(1), 18–23 (Autumn).
Perks, R. and Thomson, A. (Eds.) (1998). The Oral History Reader. New York: Routledge.
Portelli, A. (1997). The Battle of Valle Giulia: Oral History and the Art of Dialogue. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Reid, J. (1998). History, native issues and the courts: A forum. Introduction, Acadiensis 27(1), 3–7.
Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (1996). Ethical Guidelines for Research: Appendix B. Ottawa: RCAP.
Sangster, J. (1994). Telling our stories: Feminist debates and the use of oral history, Women’s History Review 3(1), 5–28.
Sayers, J. F., MacDonald, K., Fiske, J., Newall, M., George, E. and Cornet, W. (2001). First Nations Women, Governance and the Indian Act: A Collection of Policy Research Reports. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
Shopes, L. (2002). Oral history interviewing, Institutional Review Boards, and human subjects, Paper presented to the Organization of American Historians Meeting. Washington, DC (April).
Shopes, L. (n.d.) What is Research? What is an Experiment? What is an Experiment that is Research? Available at: http://www.law.uiuc.edu/conferences/whitepaper/papers/human_subjects_-_ILL_conf_2.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2006.
Silman, J. (1987). Enough is Enough: Aboriginal Women Speak Out. Toronto: Women’s.
Sutherland, N. (1992). When you listen to the winds of childhood, how much can you believe?, Curriculum Inquiry 22(3), 235–256.
Thompson, P. (1988). The Voice of the Past: Oral History, 2nd Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed.
van den Hoonaard, W. C. (2002). Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Weaver, S. (1993). First nations women and government policy, 1970–1992: Discrimination and conflict, In S. Burt, L. Code and L. Dorney (Eds.), Changing Patterns: Women in Canada, 2nd Edition. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, pp. 92–150.
Acknowledgements
My thinking about the disjuncture between the TCPS and oral history has been sharpened in conversations with Emily Arrowsmith (Department of History, Carleton University), Dr Margaret Conrad (CRC in Atlantic Canada Studies, University of New Brunswick), Dr Marc Milner (Department of History, University of New Brunswick), Janis Thiessen, Dr R. Steven Turner (Department of History, University of New Brunswick), Sharon Weaver (PhD Cand., University of Guelph), Jennifer Whiteside (Hospital Employees Union), and Doreen Worden. The recommendations are based on a submission to the Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics Consultation written in collaboration with Dr Sarah Carter (Department of History, University of Calgary) and Dr Peter L. Twohig (CRC in Atlantic Canada Studies, Gorsebrook Research Institute, Saint Mary’s University). All errors or omissions are my responsibility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Janovicek, N. Oral History and Ethical Practice: Towards Effective Policies and Procedures. J Acad Ethics 4, 157–174 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-006-9017-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-006-9017-1